Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

In my mind, there is no question that FIKI > Non -FIKI.  If you are using your airplane to travel any distances or climbing to altitude for weather and/ or winds you will be eventually be in visible moisture at temps below freezing.  Ice is hard for forecasters to predict accurately.  PIREP’s are better but no guarantee.  One minute…..no ice in the clouds.  The next minute it’s there.

I have seen shocking amounts of ice accumulate in short amounts of time in various airplanes with much more performance than the GA varieties we are talking about here and it’s never pleasant.  The ability to protect yourself while you find an out is, in my mind, priceless.  I have personally been in a GA airplane or two while accumulating ice (despite my best planning) and i do not ever want to do it again.

If you have the means or opportunity to get a FIKI airplane.  Do it.  I have used the Mooney system years ago and it works and is low maintenance too.  I would give up much more speed than the TKS unit on the Mooney costs for this benefit.  It greatly increases the ability of these traveling machines.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.