kortopates

Tapatalk is the way to go for iPhone use. I mostly read from my iPhone using Tapatalk. Making a donation solves the adds issue.

thanks Anthony, but don't have that option in Tapatalk (unless I am missing something) - just on the web where I am now so can do it. Tapatalk does offer a webview function - that might work to get me there.

JPI allows setting up Pre-alarm messages; such as a CHT alarm at 400F versus the factory limit. Unfortunately, the many options for these don’t include oil pressure. https://www.jpinstruments.com/FAQCategory/primary-instrument-alarms/ Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I stay because I love it. Over my career i’ve had extended stays in many parts of the country and i’ve always been thankful to be able to come home to southern california. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sorry to hear this. It happens unfortunately but I know you'll be prepared for it next time. With enough Turbo hours, all of us have been there, done that. In an abundance of caution, be sure to check the engine oil screen too at the rear bottom too!

Another San Diego County tax payer - are you saying they raised your assessed value by ~56%? i haven’t got my aircraft tax bill yet. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

it’s technically not legal to fly approaches with an out of date Garmin nav database and never has been. See your Garmin AFMS. Your right though, it hasn’t changed. You can fly enroute if you verify waypoints are still valid, but not RNAV approaches. But have you ever tried to verify enroute waypoints against your ipad when manually flying in IMC? lol Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yep, all correct and to be specific, its only the Nav database that needs to be upto date to fly RNAV approaches, Other databases like Safe Taxi, obstacles have no legal currency requirement. But of course it would be nuts to rely on out of date databases but you are equipped to get that info off your EFB's. Many good references quoted about the legalities of what you can do with an expired database with regards to enroute and procedures - but just wanted to point out that your Garmin AFMS in your POH trumps the AIM and AC and is also more restrictive than noted. All the database currency talk aside, I would be much more concerned though about the statement "I only plan to fly IFR a couple times a year, just maintain currency." I hope that doesn't mean to imply one can maintain instrument proficiency by flying IFR a only couple times a year! We see lots of fatal accidents involving pilots that weren't instrument current that bet their life thinking they could pull off an IMC approach and lost. Although of course one can maintain currency flying VFR practice approaches with a safety pilot or CFI, but I still don't see how one is going to do that without a current database. Limit currency flight to VOR/ILS? Maintaining GPS Buttonology is a big part of instrument proficiency. Maintaining instrument proficiency to fly IMC approaches requires monthly practice, if not weekly practice.

there are two separate gear protection circuits here. you are describing a failure in the airspeed safety switch circuit to prevent gear retraction below flying speed since the gear safety bypass switch enabled you to retract the gear. no relation to the low manifold switch to alert you the gear is still up before landing. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Why not simply send it out to one of many avionics repair stations that perform this service. They’ll bench check it to some spec perhaps much more significantly than what some one could do by powering it up in their aircraft. Then it will come back yellowed tagged showing it’s good for install by your avionics installer. Duncan is one such shop, but you can probably find one close by to you - or ship to Duncan. https://www.duncanaviation.aero/services/components-repairs/ if you call them, they’ll give you a quote to test and certify your unit. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Actually mine works beautifully without the switch. Bose is always plugged into Lemo and when I am using my mask, i have the mask mike plugged in as well. All i need to do additionally is change the squelch higher for mask, but my bose isn’t adding any nose. I assume both mike inputs are wired in parallel but i didn’t install it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Because of jamming or the like?

This was at least 5 years ago, so my memory isn't that great. But there is no fuel forward of the main spar. Forward of the main far is just air, wires and aileron rods - that gives the tanks greater protection from off field landing or bird strike . You'll see inspection covers that aren't sealed under the wings forward of the tank. You may be referring to the rear sub spar that is the aft end of the tank. I don't recall the outboard sender that far back, but it could be, and thinking about it now from a view under the wing its not very far forward from memory. So perhaps it was hanging up on the rear sub-spar? - in which case to bend it away from the rear spar it would be a forward bend. That detail of location and therefore direction of bend I can't recall precisely, just needing to bend it away from the tank wall. Its got to be the same bend direction as your. Our tanks should be near identical except yours go out further outboard than mine, but bounded by the same forward and aft limits. (Although I also have Monroy extended tanks which aren't as far forward.)

Chris, I had to bend both outboard sender arms in the aft direction. Inboard senders didn't have a problem. But both outboard sides hit the spar without without a bend. Also your correct, there isn't an issue with the aileron tube in the mid-bodies.

Yep, there is no bend in the CIES arm in the picture. So the installer didn't check for freedom of movement in the tank otherwise they would of discovered the need for the bend I wrote about back in Jan 2021 above. Just like @Fly_M20R did, I too removed the the top fuel tank inspection plate to make sure was getting adequate bend without the sender hanging up. A pain to be sure, but wasn't expecting to find them hanging up and they were very new at the time. The STC had just gotten approved when doing mine.

yeah, just like a modern airliner! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

yes. since the G1000 system is part of the type certificate, all updates/upgrades come through Mooney (short of a 3rd party getting an STC approval). it quickly gets more complicated depending on how far back the older G1000 configuration is. For example, lacking the Garmin AP. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

sounds like the circuit through the air speed safety switch. does your installation have red lighted button to bypass the safety switch? sound like you don’t. You can follow your schematic to trace out that circuit and see if the switch might be intermittent. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Bruce Covers now makes a light and much less bulky travel cover. I replaced my worn 20 yr old cover with new light travel cover and it’s perfect for trips without all the bulk. Seems much easier than taping. But I’d follow up with[mention=9886]marauder[/mention] suggestion too. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Brent, you’re going to too much trouble. Create a free account on SavvyAviation.com to upload your data and use the free analysis tools. Allows you unlimited storage of your historical data as well. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You would think so but the gear up landing statistics are evenly divided between manual and electric. plus it seems gears folding on landing is more common on the manual gear. (perhaps just more deferred maintenance on the older manual gear planes though). Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Pull the elevator and ship to Beagles Aircraft in Greeley CO, they’re one of best sheet metal repair stations in the country. they may have one available for exchange too, but wouldn’t count on it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

i flew on the GNS’s for a couple decades. Great boxes. But now nearly a decade on GTN which are a HUGE improvement. I needed to couple a GMX-200 to the 430W’s to get the equivalent functionally i get in the GTN 750. That was a much better combination than the 530. Although i had no problem twisting knobs very quickly, i do far less touching and knob twisting with the GTN airways and auto completion of fix names. the ease of use benefits go on and on. That said there is only one approach type that GTN’s can do that GNS’s can not. you don’t have to have a digital AP to enjoy the many benefits of VNAV. it’s very valuable without coupling. FS was more expensive on the GNS’ but only adds ~$1K to the GTN’s and does much more with DB concierge than what the old 210 did. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

the j-bar is no less reliable than the electric. think of the electric as a j-bar with an electrical motor as they are otherwise very identical. the electric does have a emergency manual extension. it’s your personal preference. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

oil in the intake (from turbo leaking on the intake/compressor side) will cause a CHT escalation requiring a large power reduction to keep in check. see if the #1 cyl has the lowest tube coming out of the throttle body since that’s where the oil would go IF it is the turbo leaking. A mechanic can also pull the intake tube off at the cyl to see if it’s wet. But it doesn’t take much leakage into the intake to cause problems and you apparently lost lots of oil so would be skeptical that’s it except for the CHT escalation. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk