Rick Junkin Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 56 minutes ago, hazek said: How can it be so difficult to transfer manufacturing to modern practices? Are regulations really that stiff and the process to obtain approval that cumbersome and slow? I'm pretty sure any decent shop manufacturing parts could manufacture any part for our planes. Where's the catch? And why doesn't someone just do this? If you do an internet search on "what does it take to receive FAA PMA authority" you'll find the information and reference data that will help answer your questions. In addition to cumbersome and slow, the process is expensive, especially for a shop that doesn't already have a documented formal quality assurance program. And that assumes the shop can obtain the production engineering data from the original manufacturer, or have the capability to reverse engineer the data to the FAA's satisfaction. Then there is the cost/benefit analysis that accompanies any business decision. Economy of scale is difficult or impossible to realize in our niche market, so a business needs to recoup all of the administrative, testing, tooling and setup costs in the price they charge for the limited quantity of end product. This price needs to allow the manufacturer to be profitable while remaining affordable for the end customer. We've just seen this with new production of no-back springs for the gear actuators. Affordability is in the eye of the consumer. And altruism isn't a trait commonly found in significant measure in a successful business, so if in the C&B analysis the part(s) can't be produced at a cost that allows for an affordable price, it doesn't get produced. 1 1
1980Mooney Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago (edited) 3 hours ago, Schllc said: …..and a 30% across the board raise in prices, is barely even keeping up with the inflation we have seen the last several years. That sounds exactly like what Arcline/Hartzell and other various Private Equity that are consolidating General Aviation businesses & FBO’s think and say…. Edited 3 hours ago by 1980Mooney 1
WheelPantsOff Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Parts support, combined with the aging out of the ownership population, will be the death of this brand.
hazek Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 48 minutes ago, Rick Junkin said: so if in the C&B analysis the part(s) can't be produced at a cost that allows for an affordable price, it doesn't get produced. Sure that makes sense. 49 minutes ago, Rick Junkin said: If you do an internet search on "what does it take to receive FAA PMA authority" you'll find the information and reference data that will help answer your questions. In addition to cumbersome and slow, the process is expensive This less so. In today's age with computers, especially now with quite useful AI this paperwork stuff should be an easy problem. Perhaps it's not attempted by people who excel in this sort of stuff but by people that are savvy in other relevant areas. Hopefully Lasar knows how to get these steps done cheaply enough so that the manufacturing process itself can be feasible. This parts problem is another huge concern of mine regarding the future, like AVGAS phase out, that makes me very motivated to only think about how I should find a way to drive a turbine Piper asap.
Rick Junkin Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 15 minutes ago, hazek said: This less so. In today's age with computers, especially now with quite useful AI this paperwork stuff should be an easy problem. Perhaps it's not attempted by people who excel in this sort of stuff but by people that are savvy in other relevant areas. Once you take the time to research the process, and the FAA requirements and involvement, it will make more sense to you. What "should/could be" and what "is" are two completely different things. Change/streamlining of the FAA process will not happen quickly or through actions or abilities of the users of the system. Until the FAA formally changes the PMA requirements and approval process, no amount of technical savvy on the part of an applicant will make any difference in the time or expense required to accomplish the process.
Fritz1 Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago during annual in March we discovered a small elevator bellcrank that caused excessive play between the elevator halves, small handmade part riveted together from three sheet metal plates, bushing, bearing the whole thing about 4" long. As a quick and legal fix we replaced the loose hylock fastenters with monel rivets. Consensus was that this part would be $2500 to replace if it were a Beechcraft part. The Mooney part had a lead time of 13 weeks and a price of $800. When I got the part I was amazed, Mooney had re-engineered the part to be integrally milled in one piece. No doubt they lost money on that part. Soo, parts prices will go up because they have to. About the same time I was approached by an MSC wondering if I was ready to fund parts production at Mooney with a fixed amount per year, lots of questions, nothing ever came of it and now Lasar stepped in. Problem still remains, parts production needs to be funded to build up inventory, by how much? probably by the amount of 6 months of parts sales. So, instead of moping, who is ready to step in? 300 owners at $3000 a pop makes $900k, enough the get things moving funds to be released to Lasar and/or Mooney for inventory buildup by a board of the the 3 largest donors? The whole thing blows up, guess what fonds perdu as the French say. In the end gotta pay the piper! Whoever is interested in being part of the solution, please pm me.
hazek Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 24 minutes ago, Fritz1 said: So, instead of moping, who is ready to step in? 300 owners at $3000 a pop makes $900k, enough the get things moving funds to be released to Lasar and/or Mooney for inventory buildup by a board of the the 3 largest donors? If this would guarantee me parts when I need them, no problem! Sign me up. 30 minutes ago, Rick Junkin said: Change/streamlining of the FAA process will not happen quickly or through actions or abilities of the users of the system. I wonder if this is a factual statement. Perhaps it matters how documentation is submitted. I have no idea but just going off of my personal anecdotal experience in life that when I need to pass through a bureaucratic process I seem to have less difficulty than others when I come with well prepared documentation. Perhaps this is an exception but, like I say, I wonder if that's really true.
Schllc Posted 32 minutes ago Report Posted 32 minutes ago 3 hours ago, 1980Mooney said: That sounds exactly like what Arcline/Hartzell and other various Private Equity that are consolidating General Aviation businesses & FBO’s think and say…. What isn’t 30% more expensive that it was in 2020? Most things are a lot more than 30%! Everything in the grocery store is double or more, and they have cut portion sizes.
jetdriven Posted 10 minutes ago Report Posted 10 minutes ago But the prices have gone up 40% since pre-Covid so I’m not totally sold on this. I guess when the door seal gets to be $500 we can talk about it again. All of the price increases by the Hartzell family of companies (Arcline) was not related to supply and demand.
Recommended Posts