GDGR Posted September 28, 2019 Author Report Posted September 28, 2019 Started work on the repair today. Decision was made to not remove the entire tail, and completely replace both skins. Instead, trimming back to the rivets around the damage, replacing the rib, and patching that way. Tech needed to check and see if he required a doubler around the river line, so he left this as is for now. 2024 aluminum should be here Monday, and repair completed Tuesday night ready for paint. Quote
EricJ Posted September 29, 2019 Report Posted September 29, 2019 Interesting. Please post pics of progress and completed repair. Found out today that my hangar neighbor's Comanche rolled itself off the scales while the jacks were still parked under the wings but not supporting the airplane. It landed on the jacks right on a rib on each side. He had chopped out a spot to put a temporary patch and it's kind of similar to your pic. Quote
GDGR Posted September 29, 2019 Author Report Posted September 29, 2019 Just now, EricJ said: Interesting. Please post pics of progress and completed repair. Found out today that my hangar neighbor's Comanche rolled itself off the scales while the jacks were still parked under the wings but not supporting the airplane. It landed on the jacks right on a rib on each side. He had chopped out a spot to put a temporary patch and it's kind of similar to your pic. This was stage 1. We discussed the patch and decided to go all the way to the rivets around it. More structurally sound and I think will look more professional and unnoticeable. 100% will post photos. Estimated time is 12-15 hours of work, aside from the 2-3 months it would take my AME 1 Quote
ArtVandelay Posted September 29, 2019 Report Posted September 29, 2019 Are you just going to splice in a rib section, or do you have to replace entire rib? Tom Quote
GDGR Posted September 29, 2019 Author Report Posted September 29, 2019 1 hour ago, ArtVandelay said: Are you just going to splice in a rib section, or do you have to replace entire rib? Tom The front rib goes from the middle spar forward. It’s a $125 part from Mooney. 3 rivets connect it to the spar, then all the way around the skin. Quote
ArtVandelay Posted September 29, 2019 Report Posted September 29, 2019 The front rib goes from the middle spar forward. It’s a $125 part from Mooney. 3 rivets connect it to the spar, then all the way around the skin. You got the part already?? I would think it would be a few weeks!Tom Quote
GDGR Posted September 29, 2019 Author Report Posted September 29, 2019 2 minutes ago, ArtVandelay said: You got the part already?? I would think it would be a few weeks! Tom In stock. Shipped next day. 1 Quote
Hank Posted September 29, 2019 Report Posted September 29, 2019 5 hours ago, GLJA said: The front rib goes from the middle spar forward. It’s a $125 part from Mooney. 3 rivets connect it to the spar, then all the way around the skin. Least expensive certified airplane part I've ever heard of! Hope the rest of the work goes as well. 1 Quote
GDGR Posted September 29, 2019 Author Report Posted September 29, 2019 20 minutes ago, Hank said: Least expensive certified airplane part I've ever heard of! Hope the rest of the work goes as well. The AME-S doing the work couldn’t believe it either. He was going to originally reuse the bent one, until I gave him the price on a new one. I’m anxious to see the final result Tuesday night of the repair. Quote
MikeOH Posted September 29, 2019 Report Posted September 29, 2019 (edited) 3 hours ago, Hank said: Least expensive certified airplane part I've ever heard of! WOW! I'll say. I'm thinking their computer had the wrong price...I'd bet it was supposed to be $1,250! Edited September 29, 2019 by MikeOH Quote
GDGR Posted September 29, 2019 Author Report Posted September 29, 2019 53 minutes ago, MikeOH said: WOW! I'll say. I'm thinking their computer had the wrong price...I'd bet it was supposed to be $1,250! Well, add in rush freight, duty, and exchange it soon becomes a $350 part! Feel better now? Quote
BKlott Posted September 30, 2019 Report Posted September 30, 2019 Gee, it even came primed rather than bare aluminum. Have they finally learned? Quote
MikeOH Posted September 30, 2019 Report Posted September 30, 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, GLJA said: Well, add in rush freight, duty, and exchange it soon becomes a $350 part! Feel better now? Hey, I'm happy for you! I was already feeling better knowing someone didn't get the usual aviation price gouge. Edited September 30, 2019 by MikeOH 1 Quote
GDGR Posted September 30, 2019 Author Report Posted September 30, 2019 24 minutes ago, MikeOH said: Hey, I'm happy for you! I was already feeling better knowing someone didn't get the usual aviation price gouge. I feel better putting in a new replacement rib, rather than trying to reinforce the old one. Quote
GDGR Posted October 6, 2019 Author Report Posted October 6, 2019 Cut out to the rivets, then fit in the bottom portion of the skin. Quote
GDGR Posted October 6, 2019 Author Report Posted October 6, 2019 Finished product, with etching primer on. Now to prep the rest of the tail. 3 Quote
Planegofast Posted October 7, 2019 Report Posted October 7, 2019 Just curious, my antenna faces forward. Does the antenna work facing towards the rear? I like the look better. 1 Quote
GDGR Posted October 7, 2019 Author Report Posted October 7, 2019 1 hour ago, Planegofast said: Just curious, my antenna faces forward. Does the antenna work facing towards the rear? I like the look better. Was wondering how long it would take someone to notice. Guy that did the repair was having a bad day. Had issues rethreading a couple of bolts, and fitting the top skin. I was looking through photos and mentioned that he put the antenna on backwards. Told him not to worry about it as the rudder travel isn’t affected Quote
EricJ Posted October 7, 2019 Report Posted October 7, 2019 1 hour ago, GLJA said: Was wondering how long it would take someone to notice. Guy that did the repair was having a bad day. Had issues retreading and fitting the top skin. I was looking through photos and mentioned that he put the antenna on backwards. Told him not to worry about it as the rudder travel isn’t affected The radiation pattern might be affected, but you can try it and see. Quote
gsxrpilot Posted October 7, 2019 Report Posted October 7, 2019 That forward facing antenna goes nicely with our forward canted tails. 1 Quote
GDGR Posted October 7, 2019 Author Report Posted October 7, 2019 7 minutes ago, gsxrpilot said: That forward facing antenna goes nicely with our forward canted tails. Something to this effect??? 2 Quote
ArtVandelay Posted October 7, 2019 Report Posted October 7, 2019 The radiation pattern might be affected, but you can try it and see. Won’t the tail now interfere, especially if VOR on a 90° bearing?Tom Quote
GDGR Posted October 7, 2019 Author Report Posted October 7, 2019 1 minute ago, ArtVandelay said: Won’t the tail now interfere, especially if VOR on a 90° bearing? Tom Don't think the radio waves will affect the rudder at any angle ????? Are you thinking the VOR actually rotates? If that's the case, how do the towel rack ones on the 201 and up operate? Quote
EricJ Posted October 7, 2019 Report Posted October 7, 2019 36 minutes ago, GLJA said: Don't think the radio waves will affect the rudder at any angle ????? Are you thinking the VOR actually rotates? If that's the case, how do the towel rack ones on the 201 and up operate? Changing the antenna orientation relative to the metal in the tail can be expected to affect the antenna pattern. On many aircraft the antenna whiskers point back, on some, including Mooneys, they point forward. Changing it may affect the sensitivity in certain directions since the tail will now be in a different place relative to the antenna. You can try it and see what happens, but you'll want to compare different orientations or directions to the VOR at the edge of the VORs range. It might work fine, but it might not. I'd be surprised if it isn't changed somehow. The main way to know that it isn't affected would be to put it back the way it was. The "towel rack" is a different type of antenna with a different installation that has been tested for it's particular configuration, so not really comparable. Quote
GDGR Posted October 7, 2019 Author Report Posted October 7, 2019 4 minutes ago, EricJ said: Changing the antenna orientation relative to the metal in the tail can be expected to affect the antenna pattern. On many aircraft the antenna whiskers point back, on some, including Mooneys, they point forward. Changing it may affect the sensitivity in certain directions since the tail will now be in a different place relative to the antenna. You can try it and see what happens, but you'll want to compare different orientations or directions to the VOR at the edge of the VORs range. It might work fine, but it might not. I'd be surprised if it isn't changed somehow. The main way to know that it isn't affected would be to put it back the way it was. The "towel rack" is a different type of antenna with a different installation that has been tested for it's particular configuration, so not really comparable. AME that didn’t install it says it won’t matter. Only reasoning they are installed forward (typically not on Mooney’s), is in tail draggers. That way, you don’t take an eye out with one while doing a walk around. Either way, it’s an easy swap if there are any issues. For now, I’ve got more important things to do, like prep and paint the tail. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.