bonal

Well mostly anyway

It’s been 12 years since we bought our D seems the only thing that flies faster is the time that we experience in life. Didn’t know about Mooneyspace before we purchased joined some time after when we were sorting out the issues on it. Would search google about a problem and it would always list this site called Mooneyspace sooo… I guess I should just join into this group of fine folks. Sadly like others have mentioned there have been a number of regulars that have left for various reasons and the site has suffered some because of it. If any of you are still visiting it would be nice if you would make a post just to say hello and let us know how you’re doing. Still love flying our D/C and after a good bit of initial work it has turned out to be an extremely reliable fun to fly aircraft. 2013 shortly after purchase

Didn’t know that there was a problem with Mooney’s throwing blades

Tried to look up how many aircraft are based there but couldn’t get an answer wondering if they are using city owned hangars on yearly leases or long term leases. Seriously doubt the new “owners” are going to want to co exist with the existing GA community. Death by attrition one city, oops I mean one airport at a time.

THX, 76srat looking at the FAA registry I show only my Mooney with my N number and if I do a serial number search there are dozens of different types including my D and the E that we discovered plus an m18 so based on that I think it’s a non issue.

Actually it was both, first a matching N number then the discovery of a matching serial number. I have put the issue into the nothing to see here category.

This just breaks my heart, hope the surviving passenger makes a quick and complete recovery and can shed some light on what happened. Following this thread you could feel the excitement about the new to him Mooney. Also the frustration trying to solve the issue but what was he to do after he was told that the problem was solved including test flights. I agree with the comments that conditions should have been a no go for a new to him flight with a possible issue with reliability. this really sucks

It may come as a surprise to some of you that not everyone flying and owning a Mooney has massive amounts of disposable income that can just provide a significant investment into something so ambiguous as this. Don’t want to see LASAR or Mooney fail but it’s really not our responsibility to insure their success. People are free to do whatever they like with their money but I take offense from anyone trying to guilt folks into this.

I think a Picasso painted tool shed would look awesome

Welcome to the hotel California

Not helpful but very funny

Checked and reporting facility was Kansas City center. So likely an entry error. But searching further discovered that there is an m20e same year as our d that shares the same serial number in the FAA registration records I understand that pre 1966 serial number assigned were not as specific ie year and model related and were just sequential. This raises a question about whether I need to take action with the FAA I know the data plate on our D is consistent with the registration on file. Looking at the pictures of the E it’s a nice looking plane and has a different tail number.

Thanks, I’ll check the reporting facility. It’s never happened before so makes sense that it was just a typo and not a miss registration. 190 knots wish it was me.

Hey Scott, I know mine is a o360 and not the same but every time I do the first start of the day it fires instantly but it’s a very sudden almost like a bang and then perfectly smooth. It’s not a backfire like a jolt kind of hard to describe but it’s always done this. When I crank it I don’t even see two blades before it starts. I don’t know if that’s what you’re describing but kind of sounds the same. Might be nothing. I re read your description and see where you have sputtering first so that would be different than what I experience except for violent part. Could be the difference between a carburetor prime and an FI one.