Will.iam Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago I was surprised that the garmin g1000 in my neighbor’s ovation that the standby ADI, airspeed and altimeter are on the far right side of the panel. Makes a great setup for a copilot to fly off of but how did garmin get that certified as I see all these upgraded panels and all of them have the standby adi next to the primary pfd and I hear that is the requirement. Just wondering how garmin got the g1000 approved that way. Quote
LANCECASPER Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 2 hours ago, Will.iam said: I was surprised that the garmin g1000 in my neighbor’s ovation that the standby ADI, airspeed and altimeter are on the far right side of the panel. Makes a great setup for a copilot to fly off of but how did garmin get that certified as I see all these upgraded panels and all of them have the standby adi next to the primary pfd and I hear that is the requirement. Just wondering how garmin got the g1000 approved that way. The G1000 Bonanzas have it on the far right also. Quote
Mooney in Oz Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago 4 hours ago, Will.iam said: I was surprised that the garmin g1000 in my neighbor’s ovation that the standby ADI, airspeed and altimeter are on the far right side of the panel. Makes a great setup for a copilot to fly off of but how did garmin get that certified as I see all these upgraded panels and all of them have the standby adi next to the primary pfd and I hear that is the requirement. Just wondering how garmin got the g1000 approved that way. There are many older twin engine aircraft with wider than Mooney panels, such as C400 and PA350 series that are configured this way too. I consider it dangerous in the event of a primary AH failure with no autopilot and having to (even slightly) turn one’s head to the right side deviating from normal scan for even a second or two on a dark, turbulent night trying to keep straight and level or conducting an instrument approach without slope guidance. I have no idea if there are any loss of control stats in these scenarios and it’s obviously allowed, but I disagree with it. Quote
LANCECASPER Posted 10 hours ago Report Posted 10 hours ago That's the reason I mounted a Dynon D3 Portable on my compass post. It has GPS groundspeed, attitude, GPS altitude and synthetic vision. I think I'd stand a better chance with that than the three instruments way off to my right. I wish there was enough room in the center to put one GI-275. 1 Quote
Pinecone Posted 10 hours ago Report Posted 10 hours ago It is not hard to fly cross cockpit instruments. Instructors do it all the time. It would be a good idea to practice this. But I put my back up G-5 right next to the main display and up high. I see a lot of panels with them down low. Quote
kortopates Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago It is not hard to fly cross cockpit instruments. Instructors do it all the time. It would be a good idea to practice this. But I put my back up G-5 right next to the main display and up high. I see a lot of panels with them down low. With literally thousands of hours of flying right seat i’d say it’s an acquired still that takes quite a bit of time and needs to be constantly practiced to be doable in weather. Personally i don’t think someone that hasn’t practiced it before they do it in IMC is going fairly well; especially if they weren’t proficient on the full panel to begin with.I agree with the sentiment it’s a terrible configuration to place backups were they did.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.