Jump to content

vorlon1

Supporter
  • Posts

    344
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by vorlon1

  1. Google this. Disproven in .32 seconds.
  2. A team with two quarterbacks never has one.
  3. Wow! OK. The 1ST! There's some value in that alone. GLWS.
  4. Order from LASAR. They will make one for you in a few weeks. (At least that was the situation with mine a few years ago.)
  5. Boy would I love to see THAT on vodeo...
  6. It's my understanding that Textron is again producing some...
  7. Now that parts are shipping, I will soon start a poll for compliance costs, just for the record...
  8. But you're gonna' get some anyway: I like it.
  9. I'm glad to see more responses of late.
  10. Anything on the 650? (Sorry, I don't do FB)
  11. It's clear some shop's charge more than others!
  12. Glad to see that for the most of us, this isn't costing much.
  13. Taking a poll on the cost incurred if you did NOT have the weights in question.
  14. This was one of the most fun threads to read/watch in a long time. Nicely done videos. Updates along the way. Felt like I was there!
  15. Necro post, but WOW! I know, necro post, but WOW!! (my first time hearing about this fellow. Would LOVE to buy him an adult beverage and discuss his experiences...
  16. I am looking into what it would take (and even if it possible) to make this a two dimensional panel for my 67C... @cliffy, would you post a pic of the transition area of the two panels?
  17. I talked to these folks at OskKosh last year about the earlier Mooneys, and at that point they were expecting to see them approved 'any day.' However after checking their website a late last year and finding it still unchanged, I contacted them. This is their reply: "There are very few older aircraft that had the battery forward of the firewall, the Mooney’s earlier models being one of them. The FAA believes the LOCATION of the battery somehow makes the charging system different and are requiring us to do a completely new STC and process, of which they are still “thinking” about what would be different. We have been pushing them for almost a year on this subject matter as we must play by their rules, yet they have not provided any rules yet. That being said, we do not have a time line for you. I am sorry. MAYBE you could get a Part 337 Field approval by referencing the Mooney M20E-K STC on the books." So there you have it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.