Rmfriday Posted December 17, 2024 Report Posted December 17, 2024 I have had 92Q for about two and a half years. I really like the plane and it has been good to me. I have “caught up” on some maintenance/upgrades, new donuts, overhaul the mags, new flexible lines, new engine mount with the added gussets, got rid of some plaid headliner and not so nice blue carpeting, upgraded to J yokes, standard 6 pack layout, got the Brittian working, AV30 and JPI 830. But the one thing that has driven me crazy is the false third window. I always liked the “masked“ look on Mooneys. I decided to take the plunge and try to switch it up and add a “mask” and get rid of the rear fake window. I think it turned out decent, its not perfect but I am happy with the overall outcome. I used Spray Max 368 0031 2KRapid Fill Primer and Spray Max 368 0080 2K single stage topcoat. All in it calculates to about 4.5-5.5 oz to the weight of the plane. 3 Quote
BrianWilkins Posted December 17, 2024 Report Posted December 17, 2024 I think it looks much better! Just my opinion FWIW. Quote
47U Posted December 17, 2024 Report Posted December 17, 2024 2 hours ago, Rmfriday said: I think it turned out decent, its not perfect but I am happy with the overall outcome. I think it turned out great. Please post a picture on the ramp with a wide perspective. Now, about those two different style comm antennas on top??? Really nice looking early (‘65) C model. Good work. Quote
Rmfriday Posted December 17, 2024 Author Report Posted December 17, 2024 Now, about those two different style comm antennas on top??? It had a "7" antenna but i changed it to the current straigh blade, the whip stype antenna is not centered so not sure what if anything i am going to do with it.. 1 Quote
47U Posted December 17, 2024 Report Posted December 17, 2024 1 hour ago, Rmfriday said: not sure what if anything i am going to do with it.. A consequence of a 60 year old airplane. There are antennas with offset coax connectors, if that helps, but whether or not it will match the other comm antenna is still a question. Or, at some point move the antenna to the belly with a bent whip? In the end, it’s not really a distraction to the great looks… I should have kept my trap shut. Good work. 1 Quote
KSMooniac Posted December 17, 2024 Report Posted December 17, 2024 18 minutes ago, 47U said: A consequence of a 60 year old airplane. There are antennas with offset coax connectors, if that helps, but whether or not it will match the other comm antenna is still a question. Or, at some point move the antenna to the belly with a bent whip? In the end, it’s not really a distraction to the great looks… I should have kept my trap shut. Good work. I support this idea... move the modern one over the cabin aft, and replace the whip with a bent whip on the belly. Moving the drag-producing elements further aft helps with efficiency. I think I get better performance at altitude from my bent whip on the belly, too. Nice work on the "mask"! When that factory scheme debuted several years back I wasn't a huge fan, but in your case I think you really improved what you had with just a little sweat equity. Quote
Flyler Posted December 17, 2024 Report Posted December 17, 2024 Looks good to me, much more modern. Maybe you can update us with a picture of the plane outside the hangar at some point- I bet that is where it will look best. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.