Rmfriday Posted December 17, 2024 Report Posted December 17, 2024 I have had 92Q for about two and a half years. I really like the plane and it has been good to me. I have “caught up” on some maintenance/upgrades, new donuts, overhaul the mags, new flexible lines, new engine mount with the added gussets, got rid of some plaid headliner and not so nice blue carpeting, upgraded to J yokes, standard 6 pack layout, got the Brittian working, AV30 and JPI 830. But the one thing that has driven me crazy is the false third window. I always liked the “masked“ look on Mooneys. I decided to take the plunge and try to switch it up and add a “mask” and get rid of the rear fake window. I think it turned out decent, its not perfect but I am happy with the overall outcome. I used Spray Max 368 0031 2KRapid Fill Primer and Spray Max 368 0080 2K single stage topcoat. All in it calculates to about 4.5-5.5 oz to the weight of the plane. 3
BrianWilkins Posted December 17, 2024 Report Posted December 17, 2024 I think it looks much better! Just my opinion FWIW.
47U Posted December 17, 2024 Report Posted December 17, 2024 2 hours ago, Rmfriday said: I think it turned out decent, its not perfect but I am happy with the overall outcome. I think it turned out great. Please post a picture on the ramp with a wide perspective. Now, about those two different style comm antennas on top??? Really nice looking early (‘65) C model. Good work.
Rmfriday Posted December 17, 2024 Author Report Posted December 17, 2024 Now, about those two different style comm antennas on top??? It had a "7" antenna but i changed it to the current straigh blade, the whip stype antenna is not centered so not sure what if anything i am going to do with it.. 1
47U Posted December 17, 2024 Report Posted December 17, 2024 1 hour ago, Rmfriday said: not sure what if anything i am going to do with it.. A consequence of a 60 year old airplane. There are antennas with offset coax connectors, if that helps, but whether or not it will match the other comm antenna is still a question. Or, at some point move the antenna to the belly with a bent whip? In the end, it’s not really a distraction to the great looks… I should have kept my trap shut. Good work. 1
KSMooniac Posted December 17, 2024 Report Posted December 17, 2024 18 minutes ago, 47U said: A consequence of a 60 year old airplane. There are antennas with offset coax connectors, if that helps, but whether or not it will match the other comm antenna is still a question. Or, at some point move the antenna to the belly with a bent whip? In the end, it’s not really a distraction to the great looks… I should have kept my trap shut. Good work. I support this idea... move the modern one over the cabin aft, and replace the whip with a bent whip on the belly. Moving the drag-producing elements further aft helps with efficiency. I think I get better performance at altitude from my bent whip on the belly, too. Nice work on the "mask"! When that factory scheme debuted several years back I wasn't a huge fan, but in your case I think you really improved what you had with just a little sweat equity.
Flyler Posted December 17, 2024 Report Posted December 17, 2024 Looks good to me, much more modern. Maybe you can update us with a picture of the plane outside the hangar at some point- I bet that is where it will look best.
Recommended Posts