orangemtl Posted September 11, 2011 Report Posted September 11, 2011 I've been stepping up a little at time with my Acclaim, in terms of distance, and altitude (based upon MY capacity, not the aircraft). Upon reaching cruise, I've run it at 25-26", and 2500 RPM. While the engine is fine to run LOP as we know, I've reasoned that fuel is cheaper than an engine, and I've run a bit rich of peak with more attention to cylinder temps: call me ignorant, but cool seems better than hot. Any mortal errors in my logic? Yes, hurtling along >200knots is great, but on a 3 hour flight, the additional 5-7 knots is not going to save me that much. Am I better off with a higher manifold pressure, and yet <30inches? Quote
Awful_Charlie Posted September 11, 2011 Report Posted September 11, 2011 Not an Acclaim driver (unfortunately!) but a Bravo one, so naturally numbers are likely to be wrong, and I don't read the same POH, so take this all as you like. I wouldn't use more MP than you need to get the fuel burn you want at LOP. Eg, if you can burn 15GPH at 24" LOP, then why run 30" to burn 15GPH? At 30" the turbo is working harder, the outlet temperature will be higher, and even with an efficient intercoller, the induction temperature is going to be higher, which will make the CHTs hotter. Yes, you are going to flush more 'clean air' out of the exhaust, so I suppose it is possible the the EGT's and TITs *might* be lower, but the turbo itself is going to get more of the exhaust to do the compressing (wastegate more towards closed) so will be running hotter. In theory (wonderful stuff!) when LOP the power is set by the FF, so would be interested if you see any performance difference when LOP at the same FF with different MPs Ben Quote
danb35 Posted September 11, 2011 Report Posted September 11, 2011 Quote: orangemtl While the engine is fine to run LOP as we know, I've reasoned that fuel is cheaper than an engine, and I've run a bit rich of peak with more attention to cylinder temps: call me ignorant, but cool seems better than hot. Quote
jetdriven Posted September 11, 2011 Report Posted September 11, 2011 Thats an old wives tale, don't believe it. At 4-5 GPH more ROP thats 20-25$ an hour more just in fuel, and so that's 40,000$ - $50,000 EXTRA in fuel in a 2,000 hour TBO cycle. so, "free engine and prop" when operated LOP. Quote: orangemtl I've been stepping up a little at time with my Acclaim, in terms of distance, and altitude (based upon MY capacity, not the aircraft). Upon reaching cruise, I've run it at 25-26", and 2500 RPM. While the engine is fine to run LOP as we know, I've reasoned that fuel is cheaper than an engine, and I've run a bit rich of peak with more attention to cylinder temps: call me ignorant, but cool seems better than hot. Any mortal errors in my logic? Quote
orangemtl Posted September 12, 2011 Report Posted September 12, 2011 Makes sense. Lean of Peak it is. Thanks! Quote
daveydog Posted October 23, 2011 Report Posted October 23, 2011 Joe ... brother Dave here. After a long talk with TCM, they feel pretty strongly that the issues with the cylinder longevity is directly related to the breather tube that terminates into the tailpipe. The tube builds carbon and restricts the breather tube and therefore the pressure inside the cylinder builds (measured with an airspeed indicator which is rigged to where the oil filler cap is). The indicator reads water head pressure converted through the use of the airspeed indicator attached to the oil cap during a good run-up. The test is called a blow-by test and anything over 90mph is a problem and indicates too much pressure inside the cylinders. With this restricted breather tube due to carbon build-up, poor line routing and perhaps even an undersized oil/air separator. the result is increased oil consumption and wear on the rings. This is principally the cause for reduced life cylinders. As a result, and SB has recently been issued to clean the breather tube at each oil change (50 hours) to ensure this tube is not restricted. I felt TCM was very knowledgeable on the subject and feel confident this is a correct assessment based on feedback from my service center. So Acclaim drivers ... sounds like a good idea to check that breather tube and make sure it stays clean. I hope this helps! 1 Quote
Daniel Posted October 23, 2011 Report Posted October 23, 2011 Dave, Interesting information. Have you seen (could you upload or reference) the SB? Dan Quote
daveydog Posted October 24, 2011 Report Posted October 24, 2011 Hi Dan... please see below or click on this link. Dave. http://www.mooney.com/images/pdfs/sb-pdf/m20_312.pdf MOONEY AIRPLANE COMPANY, INC. SERVICE BULLETIN 165 Al Mooney Road Kerrville, Texas 78028 MOONEY AIRPLANE COMPANY, INC. 165 Al Mooney Road, Kerrville, Texas 78028 tel: 830-896-6000 www.mooney.com Page 1 of 5 THIS BULLETIN IS FAA APPROVED FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICE BULLETIN M20-312 Date: June 27, 2011 SUBJECT: Mooney M20TN - Crankcase Breather Tube Inspection and Cleaning MODELS/ SN Mooney M20TN Acclaim and Type-S Aircraft w/TSIO550G( ) installed. AFFECTED: TIME OF WITHIN NEXT 15 FLIGHT HOURS - Re-inspect at intervals not to exceed 100 hours time in service. COMPLIANCE: INTRODUCTION: Continental Motors Inc. has found instances of oil coking and deposit build up at the crankcase breather outlet tube inside of the left hand exhaust tailpipe, which could result in the engine exhibiting higher than normal crankcase pressures and or increased oil consumption. This Service Bulletin is to provide instructions for inspecting and cleaning of the crankcase breather tube outlet and/or replacement of the crankcase breather rubber hoses. The attached compliance card needs to be filled out and returned to Mooney Airplane Company upon completion of this Service Bulletin M20--312. INSTRUCTIONS: Read entire procedures before beginning work. BREATHER TUBE AND HOSE INSPECTION: 1.1. Turn master switch - OFF. 1.2. Remove top and bottom cowling per instructions provided in Chapter 71-10-00 of applicable MAC aircraft Service & Maintenance Manual. 1.3. Using a bright light source, inspect crankcase breather tube tailpipe fitting on the left side engine exhaust tailpipe. Viewing from tailpipe outlet look into the tailpipe and inspect for oil coking and build up of deposits at crankcase breather tube tailpipe fitting on inner wall of tailpipe (see Figure SB M20-312-1) . 1.4. The outlet opening is approximately 5/8 in. (.625) when clear. Inspect all rubber crankcase breather tubes for damage or cracking (see Figures SB M20-312-2 & 3) a.) If outlet is clear and rubber hoses are in good condition, proceed to step 1.9. - Re-inspect at intervals not to exceed 100 hours time in service. b.) If outlet has build up of deposits and/or rubber hoses are found damaged, proceed to Breather Tube Cleaning. BREATHER TUBE CLEANING: 1.5. Loosen clamp and slide hose from crankcase breather tube tailpipe fitting on left hand exhaust tailpipe (see Figure SB M20-312-2). 1.6. Using a hard wire brush and/or a scraping tool sized to fit inside the tailpipe fitting, insert tool into tailpipe fitting and break away any deposit build up from interior of tube. CAUTION: Care must be taken to prevent damage to the interior of tube and tube to tailpipe weld connection. Remove only deposits from oil coking. DO NOT use any graphite impregnated tool on exhaust pieces. MOONEY AIRPLANE COMPANY, INC. 165 Al Mooney Road, Kerrville, Texas 78028 tel: 830-896-6000 www.mooney.com Page 2 of 5 1.7. After removing build up, use wire bristle brush to clean any fine particles that remain and flush with Stoddard solvent. 1.8. Reinstall hose(s) onto breather tube outlet tube(s) and tighten clamp(s) (see Figures SB M20-312-3) NOTE: Replace any rubber breather hose if it is damaged or cracked using P/N 628555--45 (trim to fit). Per the engine maintenance manual, inspect the entire length of the breather system for blockage (FOD) and remove as required. 1.9. Re-install top and bottom cowling per instructions provided in Chapter 71-10-00 of applicable MAC aircraft Service & Maintenance Manual. 1.10. Complete log book entry. NOTE: Fill out compliance card and send by MAIL or FAX to Mooney Airplane Company as indicated on the attached Compliance Card (see to Figure M20-312-4) 1.11. Return aircraft to service. 1.12. Procedure complete WARRANTY: Mooney Airplane Company, Inc. will warrant labor 1 hour when corrective action is done in accordance with procedures of this Service Bulletin for aircraft currently covered under the Mooney Airplane Company, Inc. factory warranty program. REFERENCE 1. MAC Maintenance Manual (applicable A/C) DATA: 2. Continental Motors M-18 Maintenance and Overhaul Manual PARTS LIST: Refer to Continental Motors - Customer Service at 800.326.0089 for part procurement. Parts Kit P/N: Item P/N Description Qty 1. 628555--45 HOSE (.75 I.D. X 30”) Trim to Fit 1 MOONEY AIRPLANE COMPANY, INC. 165 Al Mooney Road, Kerrville, Texas 78028 tel: 830-896-6000 www.mooney.com Page 3 of 5 HOSE ASSY HAS BEEN REMOVED NOTE: INSPECT FOR OIL COKING AND BUILD UP OF DEPOSITS 5/8 in. (.625") WHEN CLEAR Figure SB M20-312-1 - CRANKCASE BREATHER TUBE INSPECTION HOSE CLAMP(S) Figure SB M20-312-2 - CRANKCASE BREATHER TUBE, HOSE AND CLAMPS MOONEY AIRPLANE COMPANY, INC. 165 Al Mooney Road, Kerrville, Texas 78028 tel: 830-896-6000 www.mooney.com Page 4 of 5 REPLACE ALL DAMAGED OR CRACKED HOSES IF REQUIRED ANY BLOCKAGE REMOVE AND/OR COKING LH SIDE VIEW 628555-45 HOSE P/N TRIM TO FIT (2) PLACES Figure SB M20-312-3 - CRANKCASE BREATHER HOSE INSPECTION MOONEY AIRPLANE COMPANY, INC. 165 Al Mooney Road, Kerrville, Texas 78028 tel: 830-896-6000 www.mooney.com Page 5 of 5 MOONEY AIRPLANE COMPANY KERRVILLE, TEXAS 78028 -- 1-800-331-3880 SERVICE (BULLETIN) (INSTRUCTION) NO.________________HAS BEEN COMPLIED WITH ON AIRCRAFT MODEL _______________ SERIAL NUMBER ________________ Tach. Time: Owner: N-Number (Reg. No.) Date of Compliance: Complied By: Form 07-0001 Inspection Report: MOONEY AIRPLANE COMPANY ATT’N: TECHNICAL SUPPORT 165 Al Mooney Road, North Kerrville, Texas 78028 PLACE STAMP HERE SEND TO: Mooney Airplane Company 165 Al Mooney Road North Kerrville, TX 78028 OR FAX: (830) 257-4635 Figure SB M20-312-4 -- Compliance Card Quote
Joe Zuffoletto Posted October 25, 2011 Author Report Posted October 25, 2011 Thanks, brother Dave! Arapahoe Aero is on top of it and performed the required inspection during my last oil change. Hey, that's a nice new plane you got there! Quote
daveydog Posted November 3, 2011 Report Posted November 3, 2011 Joe and others... here some new information. Any advise: I am considering removing my oil/air separator due to crank case pressure buildup in my Acclaim. I posted the breather tube issue and SB issued by Mooney for the same issue but my mechanic feels it might be prudent to remove it all together. Sure it may need a little more belly cleaning and oil, but at the risk it causes to the cylinders, I'd rather do that. Any thoughts. He also stated some other and better separators such as air wolf. Any thoughts? Thanks! Quote
daveydog Posted December 6, 2011 Report Posted December 6, 2011 any acclaim drivers out there who did the midwest STC for the 310hp upgrade? Quote
Randyb Posted September 18, 2018 Report Posted September 18, 2018 I have 1200 hours on my acclaim. So far I topped 1 cylinder only because the mechanic was misguided and held my plane hostage. At 1200 hours I’m using 1qt oil per 3 to 4 hours down from 1 qt every 8 to 10 hours. the engine is 11 years old and is flown 100 hours per year. Compression is from 62 to 72. I usually fly at 14500 with 28” and 2400 rpm. I keep TIT at 1600 and CHT below 400 and burn 14.1 gallons in cruise LOP at 180 kts. Going ROP burns about 18 gallons and adds 10 KTS ROP gives me 10 extra KTS for 4 gallons or almost $20 per hour more LOP saves about $1800 per year in fuel and lord knows how much in engine repairs 1 Quote
carusoam Posted September 18, 2018 Report Posted September 18, 2018 Nice informative first post, Randy! Best regards, -a- Quote
Jeff_S Posted September 20, 2018 Report Posted September 20, 2018 On 9/18/2018 at 2:56 PM, Randyb said: I have 1200 hours on my acclaim. So far I topped 1 cylinder only because the mechanic was misguided and held my plane hostage. At 1200 hours I’m using 1qt oil per 3 to 4 hours down from 1 qt every 8 to 10 hours. the engine is 11 years old and is flown 100 hours per year. Compression is from 62 to 72. I usually fly at 14500 with 28” and 2400 rpm. I keep TIT at 1600 and CHT below 400 and burn 14.1 gallons in cruise LOP at 180 kts. Going ROP burns about 18 gallons and adds 10 KTS ROP gives me 10 extra KTS for 4 gallons or almost $20 per hour more LOP saves about $1800 per year in fuel and lord knows how much in engine repairs Interesting numbers, although at 14.5K feet my Ovation will get 175 knots on 12.5 GPH so the performance is pretty close. Is 28/2400 really below the 65% hp recommended for LOP ops? It seems like if I’m pulling that in my NA engine I’m at a bigger HP. Admittedly, I have to be pretty low to see 28”! Quote
N231BN Posted September 20, 2018 Report Posted September 20, 2018 Interesting numbers, although at 14.5K feet my Ovation will get 175 knots on 12.5 GPH so the performance is pretty close. Is 28/2400 really below the 65% hp recommended for LOP ops? It seems like if I’m pulling that in my NA engine I’m at a bigger HP. Admittedly, I have to be pretty low to see 28”! The acclaim has a low compression engine due to being turbocharged so the numbers won't match your ovation. Quote
Jeff_S Posted September 20, 2018 Report Posted September 20, 2018 Ah, yes...I wasn't factoring in the lower compression cylinders. Thanks! Quote
N231BN Posted September 20, 2018 Report Posted September 20, 2018 Also, if you run deep LOP you can do so at higher power settings and stay out of the red box. Quote
2659AU Posted December 20, 2018 Report Posted December 20, 2018 Interesting Discussion. We have a 2009 Acclaim. Recently we have started seeing a white buildup in one of the turbos - significant enough that it is starting to interfere with the turbo impeller. Not really sure, but it may coincide with more operation at lower power settings (e.g. 27" 2400 50 LOP) and cooler TIT - as low as 1570 degrees. Has anyone else experienced this? Can anyone suggest what is going on? Or suggest a solution? Quote
jackn Posted December 20, 2018 Report Posted December 20, 2018 Sounds like lead. If you’re LOP & getting this regardless of power setting, sound like a bad exhaust valve. Compression test & borescope. Quote
carusoam Posted December 20, 2018 Report Posted December 20, 2018 Welcome aboard 9AU. Got a pic of what you are seeing? Do you have any JPI data / graphs you can share? Since you have the turbo off... looking up the exhaust manifold can indicate which cylinder is the offending one... If it is a valve issue... JPI data is pretty good at finding/showing these things... Dental cameras are pretty good at seeing valves from spark plug holes... bad valves have or leave strong visual evidence... PP thoughts only, not a mechanic... Best regards, -a- Quote
Bentonck Posted April 11, 2020 Report Posted April 11, 2020 Great thread, and enjoyed the post Randy as I am stuck at 14500 feet for a while until I finish instrument training and get my license validated here. (14500 is max VFR altitude in Brazil!) .. Does anyone have that SB in a saved pdf? The link that is posted is busted and I would like to take that to my shop here... Quote
carusoam Posted April 11, 2020 Report Posted April 11, 2020 Benton, @Bentonck which SB number are you looking for? This one? https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/4147179/technical_documents/service_bulletins/M20_312.pdf You should be able to access the archaic website that is still available... I post the link, that should be a list of all the SBs for a Mooney M20TN... https://www.mooney.com/service Click around to see what you can find... The site has never worked in a standard fashion... but the data has always been there... Best regards, -a- Quote
Bentonck Posted April 12, 2020 Report Posted April 12, 2020 That's the one Carusoam, my plane is still in the shop and I'm going to shoot this over and have them look while it's still there. They are buttoning it up tomorrow and if my wife let's me out I'm going to pick it up and bring it back this week.... Thanks for the help! 1 Quote
Bentonck Posted April 13, 2020 Report Posted April 13, 2020 Another question for other Acclaim owners, following the Mooney link above I found SB-319 which is much more extensive than the SB-312...now instead of a cleaning and inspection they wanted a revised breather installation...has everyone complied with this? Obviously this would be out of pocket in my case, I asked the mechanic to take a look at it and see if it had been complied with and get back to me but my guess is that it has not. Anyone have any experience with this? This is the SB I'm referring to.... M20_319.pdf Has this been carried out on most of the fleet in the States? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.