Jump to content

If Garmin was smart...

Godfather

By Godfather
in Avionics/Panel Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

Bunti Collaborator

Bunti

Posted
Posted

The better resolution (more pixels) of the GTN 750 in comparison to the IFD was one of the main reasons why I bought the GTN750.  I am very happy with it.

After I have sent my flightplan from my Ipad via the Flightstream 210 to the GTN 750, there is no need of using the Ipad for the rest of the flight.  The only time I have to use the Ipad is during an IFR approach for the approach charts because I did not buy the approach charts for the GTN until now.

 

  • Like 1
  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

KLRDMD
KLRDMD

That's called an Avidyne 440 

Bennett
Bennett

Hey, I'm not bashing Avidyne, Aspen, or any other avionics firm. I am a fan or Garmin simply because all my Garmin avionics "stuff" ( GTN 750, GTN 650, AERA 796, GDL 88, FlightSteam 210, remote audio

KLRDMD
KLRDMD

The IFD is so far superior to the GTN series it is ridiculous. 3D synthetic vision. GTN - Nope ! ARS on a GTN - give me a break !! Built in WiFi, built in Bluetooth - not available on a GTN. Forward L

Posted Images

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.