slowflyin

I've had a couple and by far my favorite is the Alpha systems with the HUD display mounted on the glare shield. I fly a Bravo. The other unit I had was mounted on the panel and I found it much less useful. For me, having the indicator in my field of view to the runway makes a significant difference.

Looks like it was pried up. Not sure what could have caused it but I can't imagine you wouldn't have noticed it while getting in or out of the AC. As it's pried outwards it seems unlikely it was an inflight event.

It seems reasonable to hypothesize a more aggressive fuel may be fine for freshly sealed tanks but would cause old, weak sealant to fail. MY Bravo never leaked a drop until I had the paint stripped. After inspection, Eddy advised the sealant was susceptible due to it's age. I'm more concerned about the paint damage. Most AC will leak sometime. Big difference in resealing a 30 year old tank with unknown life expectancy prior to G100UL and resealing and repainting. Alibi, I'm not wading off into the "drop in replacement" waters. I understand the position.

850 with no wind is doable. Westbound typically means significant headwind up high or slower down low. Either way, 850 Westbound isn't something I'd plan on ROP. LOP helps dramatically but not all Bravos care for it.

Agreed!

AOPA only supported the ADSB mandate after receiving assurances from the FAA that it would not be used for anything but safety and navigation. Seems like this is a reasonable bill.

Thanks to all for responding!

I'm planning on taking the IA exam in May and I'm looking for advice regarding preparation. I used Baker's years ago for my A&P. I tend to do well with written test and have had success with self study aides such as King Schools so I'm wondering if time at Bakers is wise. Thanks in advance.

I have it and love it! For me, the heads up display mounted on the glare shield is a must. During the landing phase it's just where it needs to be. Fly the blue doughnut with a cross reference to the airspeed indicator for on-speed landings regardless of weight. Extended, aircraft in the landing configuration. No. For me, the AOA is useful for landing at different weights. By myself with 45 minutes of fuel is a much slower approach than landing with folks and baggage at maximum landing weight. No buyers remorse!

Prayers

Wilkerson makes great tires and is a fantastic, multi-generation, family business. Lots of folks land here and use our courtesy car to haul tires.

THIS

I've had the manual on two different Mooney and like it. Manual allows you to feel how much pressure your applying. The install is simpler as well.

I run similar power settings to @fritz1 and see similar results. My commute has shortened so I don't fly as high as often with typical altitudes of 9-10K. Most days at 75% I see 174-176 TAS. Last time I took a longer trip it was summer time with 196 TAS at 75% at 18K. I also have TKS. I've been told TKS cost 10 kts. I'd argue that only holds true if your not in ice. I see an increase of about 2 kts per thousand feet over 8K. I've also been told to expect 200 @ 18K @ 75% in a non-tks Bravo.

I have the KFC150 with a GI275 driving it. My installer left the King Alt. Preselect the panel and I was told the GI 275 would not drive Alt preselect.