Ned Gravel
Supporter-
Posts
2,066 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Media Demo
Events
Everything posted by Ned Gravel
-
Need mechanic for pre-purchase inspection on M20J 201
Ned Gravel replied to sevydrassel's topic in General Mooney Talk
Sevy: Welcome to Rockcliffe!! If you look for mine (I think I have spot E81), you will not find it. It is in Clarence's @M20Doc hanger in CYKF undergoing some refurbishment of the interior. Currently awaiting parts from Airtex. I recommend him. All you have to arrange is put him and the aircraft in the same space. Good luck - and we have to talk about the Mooney Caravan when I get my aircraft back. -
Texas Aircraft - LSA. Is this what Mooney should do?
Ned Gravel replied to chinoguym20's topic in General Mooney Talk
I agree, but I am sort of biased. -
We have one here in Ottawa/Gatineau. He went from an Acclaim to a TBM.
-
4 mile final and the Johnson Bar comes apart
Ned Gravel replied to Ned Gravel's topic in Vintage Mooneys (pre-J models)
Yup. Threaded rod is attached to the inside of the top handle and the nut at the bottom is attached to the rest of the retraction bar and keeps the handle from being ejected by the spring. It takes work to put the locknut on and takes more work to put a second nut on tight to the first. But better that work than having it explode in your hand after 15 years of use and abuse from a ham-fisted "love-my-Johnson-bar" pilot. Clarence tells me that I bent the rod when I shoved it back onto the bar - but he was able to straighten it out. Ah........ -
4 mile final and the Johnson Bar comes apart
Ned Gravel replied to Ned Gravel's topic in Vintage Mooneys (pre-J models)
After Action Report Conclusion. Turns out the locknut had worked loose from the threaded rod in the handle of the retraction bar and nothing was holding the handle in place. When the folks in the shop looked at it, they told me they had replaced the locknut with a new one. I immediately went into "belt and braces" mode. There is now a second nut on that threaded rod to lock the two of them together. Now I feel better. -
Yup. Agree. Here is my iPad in landscape where there is more room across the top. So it looks like viewing in portrait mode is now pooched. Too bad. Enjoyed that.
-
-
Messages gone and the ability to mark unread content is also gone. There is no message symbol at all
-
4 mile final and the Johnson Bar comes apart
Ned Gravel replied to Ned Gravel's topic in Vintage Mooneys (pre-J models)
I have to admit that the go-round option was a possibility, and I thought about it for about a half second and discarded it. I considered that this was really only going to end one of two ways and a go-round would not change either of those two possibilities - both of which were entirely acceptable. If it was going to be much more work than simply banging the handle back onto the retraction lever (the only way I could ensure gear down) then a go round was not going to allow me to improve on that. I was at 1000' AGL and a long ways away (about 2 and half minutes of flying although I did not do that calculation at the time) and I "knew" I had the time to either attempt a successful solution or abandon the attempt altogether and put her down on her belly, all within the time of the approach. I cannot argue against a go-round. I am certainly always ready for such on approaches until I can commit to the landing. But at the time, both of the available outcomes were acceptable to me and the third had been discounted. The absolute advantage to a go-round is to take the deep breath and then take longer preps for possible outcomes. I have to agree with that. When the handle was forced back on and the whole thing locked into the downlock block, I had the time to consider what would have followed if I had not been able to jury rig my solution. That was when the idea of a go-round really came home. In this visual approach, everything was happening in slow time and I had a good safety net. In an instrument approach, there would have been none of that. Had this occurred in IMC, I would have immediately executed a missed approach. Climb to 4000' on runway heading and expect vectors - lotsa time to talk with someone and figure something out. Can't follow the needles, control pitch, trim and airspeed and then bang on the handle at the same time during an instrument approach. I can read the "loss of concentration" words in the TSB findings now. So, yes. Go-round in IMC mandatory. And if my visual approach had been jiggered at all by the shenanigans in the cockpit - also mandatory. As it was, I succeeded in ending the potential problem with 700 feet left to descend. But this is a good discussion about "what ifs" anyway. Part of a good after-action report. -
4 mile final and the Johnson Bar comes apart
Ned Gravel replied to Ned Gravel's topic in Vintage Mooneys (pre-J models)
Well.. There was that too. ATP in the left seat and you in the back seat. Such a joy!!! But I am not certain if you understand how grateful I am for the offer to do that for me. I am. Very. Kidding aside, I was watching him (not to be named here without his permission) do exactly what I would do all through the flight home. You ever notice how an instrument rated pilot lowers their eyes to the panel just before entering clouds? We both did it at the same time and I wasn't doing any of the flying. Requesting diversions around buildup to avoid growing CU. exactly as I would do as well. We have all learned many of the same lessons. And I got home 7 days sooner than I originally anticipated. I am probably going to ask @yvesg to fly us both to Waterloo when we pick it up. We have not done a whole pile of formation work this year. So this might be a good opportunity for the trip home. Videos will follow. In the meantime, can you get pictures of the parts for MS when you figure out what happened? -
4 mile final and the Johnson Bar comes apart
Ned Gravel replied to Ned Gravel's topic in Vintage Mooneys (pre-J models)
Thanks for this and I will admit to a little self-congratulation on the outcome of the event. Between "Who'da thunk it?" and "Holy Crap" lives the old soldier. You know the guy: "Don't worry son. Ain't nuthin' we can't handle." I am not always that guy. But I would like to be. Occasionally, we all get to rise to our own expectations of ourselves. This time it worked. It has not always done so. Now back to our regularly scheduled discussion of everyday non-life-threatening enjoyment of flying our Mooneys. "Nothing more to see here. Move along." -
4 mile final and the Johnson Bar comes apart
Ned Gravel replied to Ned Gravel's topic in Vintage Mooneys (pre-J models)
That's the part I like... -
As many of you know, I have owned my '65 E model since 2005 and one of the reasons I bought a J-Bar Mooney was serious lack of confidence in RGs that were operated either electrically or hydraulically. This reticence was caused by a ground loop in a PA-28-180R Arrow that sent the front gear to work for the other team because I chanced to lift off a minus 26 deg Celcius and the nose gear broke something during transition. In the end, the fault was mine because I was operating the aircraft outside its envelope (ie: below -25 deg C) but I was already on the "I gotta own the gear if I fly an RG" rant. Along came J-Bar Mooneys and I was hooked. Loved them ever since. With nearly 900 hours in mine, I feel that I can make mine dance. Yesterday however, an incident occurred that nearly spelled the end of my relationship with C-FSWR. After 1:51 of flying time to deliver C-FSWR for its annual, I was cleared by Toronto Center for the visual approach to runway 26 in Waterloo and told to contact the tower. That done, I started to configure the aircraft for landing. At about 4 miles out on final, I reached for the J Bar, pulled it out of the uplock block on the floor and it came apart in my hands. Off popped the handle for the retraction lever, followed by the spring. Handle in my right hand and the retraction lever too short (without the attached handle) to go into the downlock block and keep the gear safely down for the landing. Options ? First option, the airplane now belongs to my insurance company. Equipment failure will result in a gear up landing. Either I walk away with a totalled aircraft, or it pays for the repairs. My only job at this point is to save my life. This is not really a difficult thing to do looking at 7000' of 150' wide runway at 1000' AGL doing 120 MPH. All the time in the world and all the runway needed to make a safe belly scraping landing. That whole consideration took about 2 seconds of my time. Second option, try to piece it back together during the 3.5 miles or so left to me so the handle will fit into the downlock block and allow me to get it to the shop so it can be repaired during the annual. That cogitation took about one more second. Decision? (Aviate - Navigate - Communicate) 1. Maintain the approach (lotsa time available for option 1) 2. Try to put it back together until about 500' AGL, then abandon this approach and proceed to drop the flaps and put it down at or below 65 MPH for option 1. What happened? I slipped the handle back over the top of the retraction lever and banged it three or four times until it settled over the lever as it is supposed to do - albeit minus its spring. Then I pushed the whole thing forward into the downlock block and pushed the handle up into the block until it clicked into the handle's catch. Pulled down to make sure it was locked - and it was. I was now at 700' AGL and good for a wheels down landing. I still did three GUMPS checks on a no-flaps landing - no flare - just let it settle on a squeaker. Ahhhhhh. C-FSWR lives to fly another day and my new seats (from @Alan Fox) and my new gear handle lock blocks (from @Sabremech) are going to be installed. I don't think I will need a new gear retraction handle, but I have every confidence someone is going to look real close as to why it came apart in the first place. @M20Doc (Clarence) now has C-FSWR in his shop for the annual and new installs. There may be a resulting change in my procedures, but this lesson will not have cost us as much as it might have. Although I have not flown enough since January to feel real comfortable in my proficiency, yesterday's success partly mollified my guilt. Isn't the only excitement we want to experience in flight to be generated from our love of flying? I guess yesterday I was supposed to have more excitement than that. To top it all off, Clarence and his friend flew me back to Ottawa in a Turbonormalized Twink. 1:24 at 18 gph. I paid for the gas - it was only fair. Gratitude - there but for the grace of God go I................I remain in the left hand column - those have have yet to land gear up.
- 37 replies
-
- 17
-
Importing a Mooney to the U.S. from Canada
Ned Gravel replied to Ario's topic in General Mooney Talk
Me too. Annual is next week. -
Flew with Bob on more than one Caravan. He will be missed. Prayers for Nancy and the family from Ute and I.
-
Clarence will know. @M20Doc He will be installing them in my ‘65 E.
-
Mine are worse than these. So I bought these from Alan. They will be headed to Clarence's shop soon to replace the ones in C-FSWR. And for @Sabremech, not to worry. We will transfer the seat-back adjustment knobs you made to these seats when they are installed. Thank you Alan, Clarence and David.
-
Phil: Mine is to use when flying in US airspace. I have an ongoing dialogue now with uAvionix to upgrade to the dual band one when it is certified. It will speak to both the Aerion system to be used in Canada (1090 ES) and the UAT system use in the US (978). But for now, all I need is the US one. Because it is not mandated here, all I did (legally and in the logbooks) was change the tail mounted nav light.
-
So, we all went and spent some AMUs to install ADSB out (albeit for the 978 MHz ground based system). I got a Tail Beacon and did the internal systems check that showed it was working. As COVID 19 restrictions are being lifted, we are doing a little more flying to places (instead of just going, overflying, and coming back to our home drome). Today is the day to check out the ADSB on US ATC screens. So I called our Center Control folks (Montreal for me) and asked them if they got the ADSB data from the US system. Canada is leading the effort for the Aerion 1090 ES satellite based system so any data they get from 978 systems have to come from the US. Well that is not happening and they were reluctant to comment on why that was. OK by me. I will let them sort that out themselves. But Montreal Centre got on the "hot line" to Boston Centre and were told by Boston Centre not to bother, because it is "not turned on yet." So no ADSB confirmation check for me today. We will be forced to just enjoy the flying. For @peevee S'up? Aren't you folks using it yet?
-
Serge: Well, you did fly in mine. Does that not count?
-
What does your gear down indicator look like?
Ned Gravel replied to Ross Taylor's topic in Vintage Mooneys (pre-J models)
Mine is a round bar in the vertical position by my right leg. Sorry, couldn't help it. You knew one of the J-bar pilots was going to say something. -
65 "E" 2000 TT , 259 SFOH , 10 SPOH 55000.00
Ned Gravel replied to Alan Fox's topic in Aircraft Classifieds
HA!! One made just before mine. My 65E is Serial number 831.