Leaderboard

Rather than spending the ridiculous $79 for the GoPro aviation filter made by NFlightCam, I decided to make my own. I ordered a .6 neutral density filter sheet from Amazon for $7 and simply cut a round piece that fits inside the waterproof case in front of the lens. If you want to completely eliminate the prop (blur the prop) and see what the naked eye sees, simply cut two pieces and place in front of lens, or order a 1.5 ND filter. I also added a the filter inside my iPhone case in front of the lens. Works great there too! http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000B73OL4/ref=oh_details_o00_s00_i00?ie=UTF8&psc=1 http://www.amazon.com/Lee-Neutral-Density-Lighting-Filter/dp/B000B73OM8/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1371733635&sr=8-1&keywords=20x24+1.2+neutral+density+filter

Bob, That looks like what my A&P uses, except yours is new and his doesn't have that fancy swivel hook, just an eye bolt.

Ward, in a Rocket, the problem is if you need to quickly change power settings, like a go around, neutral trim on approach will get you killed. While it makes sense to trim to neutral most of the time, I prefer to keep it trimmed a little down on approach in case I need to go around and won't have time to adjust the trim and can't fly it full power and full up trim.

Because engines fueled with 100LL have never blown up. Seriously? Diesel may or may not be the answer, but a single engine failure really isn't relevant at all to answering the question.

I honestly think we're all over thinking this. Imagine you're a small business owner trying to build a business without running out of money ( which Mooney has now done twice). If you could build a rudder that needed the same tooling and manufacturing processes as the elevator with only modest diminution in performance and could produce a distinctive profile to boot, what would you do? That is what, I believe, Mr. Mooney did. Modest diminution in performance is probably something I'll be challenged on, but the trade off in what he did, it seems to me, is accepting an elevator that has a symmetrical cross section. I THINK that requires a greater angle of attack to produce the needed lift. But it saved money. I love my Mooney but think a few compromises were made. I don't blame Al.

This is great information. Thanks for posting this.

I never retract my flaps if I have a negative rate of climb (NRC).....

I consider a positive rate of climb (PRoC) to be the absolute determining factor and a MUST before flap retraction. PRoC should be in your poll Mike. You don't you even mention it?! I retract flaps once I have a PRoC and clear of any obstacles. PRoc, gear up, flaps up.