Jump to content

Repair or Replace?


Recommended Posts

I have an 18 year old RC Allen Electric Attitude Indicator that has quit working. It is used as a back-up indicator to the Vacuum Attitude Indicator in my 64 C Model.

 

Would you have it fixed/overhauled for I think about $600 or would you put in a Dynon D1 for $1375?

 

The Dynon will mount/clip in to the existing Electric AI hole.

 

I am A VFR pilot at this time but plan on working on my Instrument Rating soon.

 

Thanks for your input.

 

Bob

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Dynon is legal (not perm installation), just supplemental to his vac AI. That said, a back-up plan for vacuum failure is a good idea (beyond the rest of the 6-pack) however, not knowing your panel, there's a lot of other nice to haves that would trump that for IFR flying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You either need an electric AI or electric T/C to be legal for IFR.  However, the Dynon is superior.  If you have room, you can install a used T/C for 300$ and put in a Dynon D1.

 

I ran my Castleberry electric AI off the main bus but after 50 hours it failed. They blamed it on power surges during starting, so i had to power it with the avionics bus. I think the main bus is more reliable, but no way to do it.   The Dynon is a similar issue.

 

EDIT: I failed to clarify. The Dynon is not a legal alternative to FAR required instruments for IFR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd do the same as Jetdriven.  The D1A is also a GPS receiver and provides GPS ground speed, altitude, vertical speed, and ground track and can run on battery or the aircraft's power.  I love all of the high quality Dynon's products for the experimental aircrafts and I wish we could use them without restrictions.  After all experimental aircrafts fully equipped with Dynon's gear are permitted in the IFR system.  Go figure .  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

   (quote)    " It is used as a back-up indicator to the Vacuum Attitude"        If the instrument you are replacing is a back-up and not one of the instruments required in those "for IFR flight" then I personally would put a D1 in its place. I just got my bird back from a panel upgrade and I now have an extra place in my panel, I've too been thinking of going with the D1. I dont think it can be panel mounted and be legal nor can it be hard wired and be legal, however, legal or no, if a pilot lost AI or T/C it could be a lifesaver. The D1 has a backup battery so in case of electrical failure it keeps on clickin along.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Core for the RC Allen is only $450 and likely over $700 for a OH/exchange. Then what do you still have? The sloppiest, droopiest AI ever designed. Many people ruin these units by continuously pulling the cage lever after sturt up. The RC Allen takes a long time to get to full speed, so users cage it too early, then it is out of reference, then you cage it again and so on.

 

In addition to a vacum AI, you only need a slip/skid in a 64C to be IFR, so I think the DI would be money better spent. I'd fly with that rather than an old RC Allen rebuilt unit. My $.02.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would repair the RC Allen. The $775 can be put to better use.

 

I didn't know about the issues with the RC Allen AI that 52H mentioned but other things being equal I certainly disagree that $775 can be put to better use than a back up AI which btw not only can run on battery power but also includes a bunch of other nav information.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't know about the issues with the RC Allen AI that 52H mentioned but other things being equal I certainly disagree that $775 can be put to better use than a back up AI which btw not only can run on battery power but also includes a bunch of other nav information.  

How about paying for IFR training?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see that the OP has no gallery, so I'm only going off the thumbnail picture in his avatar, but it looks like he already has the required AI and turn coordinator to be IFR legal. The AI he is considering trading, seems to be an elective, redundant AI, not a required one. In this case, the Dynon is great replacement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Follow-up: I have owned an RC Allen for 12 years and it had the problems I mentioned. I researched core exchange and rebuild. I also fly with two other friends who have the same RC Allen unit and they behave similarly.

 

Also, Byron mentioned the Castleberry unit, sold for only $1500 through Sporty's. Based on what I have heard about them (and Catsleberry FD's), their service history is not comparably the best and they are refered to by many as "delicate".

 

Re: DI......I think it is a game changer. If I were a CFII flying in the junk everyday, I'd devote my headset budget to a DI and carry it from plane to plane. Or if I had a Pitts, it could help a lot.

 

Finally, I think Aspen, Garmin and Dynon products are game changers for Pre J non standard panels. I think the price is worth it. Even as high as 30% of hull value, fancy avionics can now change the untility and dispatch of these great planes. A $9k Aspen install can evolve a $45k 66 E model considerably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another option is RC Allen's digital units. I've had one now for 3 years in my aircraft (removed it from arrow, reinstalled in Mooney) and could not be happier. Pricy at $3300 with back up battery, but works flawlessly in my experience and it's completely independent of the bus in case of electrical gremlins causing one to turn the master switch off.

 

As to Aspens/G500, etc, after having the Aspen in my Arrow and the standard KI256/HSI system in my Mooney, I honestly do not miss it at all. With my Garmin 797 mounted on the yoke and GMX 200 over my GNS430 and flight director, I do not feel I've given up any situation awareness at all and saved myself 20K in purchase and install costs. That's a lot of KI256 overhaul's which seems to last about 1000 hours or so in my airplane according to log books.

 

Now, as to the flight director, I do not understand how I ever flew an airplane without before. It's the best thing since sliced bread, bar none.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, Byron mentioned the Castleberry unit, sold for only $1500 through Sporty's. Based on what I have heard about them (and Catsleberry FD's), their service history is not comparably the best and they are refered to by many as "delicate".

The Castleberry is now 2500$ through Spruce, and AFAIK it is better than the RCAllen, but yes you have to be careful with it.  It does take 3-4 minutes to spool up and the erection mechanism is weak. I wonder if it would get out of whack during unusial attitudes.  But it is lighted and has a very precise pitch indicator.  We got it for a grand on eBay and 75 hours later had to spend 400$ on a repair.

 

The Mitchell vacuum AI erects within seconds and is very accurate.  It alos drives the autopilot.

 

here is our installation

post-7887-0-73533500-1357232566_thumb.jp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Byron...how fast are you flying there? I can't read it. Were you maintaining straight and level with the airspeed needle? :):):) (joking, of course). Astel...precisely my point, even a $1300 digital device or a $20k digital device, comensurately can change how you fly.

 

I think the Dynon is the way to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all of your input to my question. I do have the primary vacuum AI, an STEC 30 with turn coordinator and slip/skid ball.I do understand that the other gauges can be used to fly the plane if one loses the AI.  The D1 can be installed in a panel hole with a pinch type mount that comes with it (thus not permanently mouted). Since this is a back-up and is not a required piece of equipment for IFR flight, it seems to me to be biggest bang for the buck.

 

If I decice to not get my IR, I will probably use the current electric AI hole to install an engine monitor (JPI 730 or 830) at a later date.

 

I have only had this plane a short while and just recently got my PPL in it.  I have been reading "Instrument Flying" to help me decide if I want to work towards an Instrument Rating so the bigger question may be IR or not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all of your input to my question. I do have the primary vacuum AI, an STEC 30 with turn coordinator and slip/skid ball.I do understand that the other gauges can be used to fly the plane if one loses the AI.  The D1 can be installed in a panel hole with a pinch type mount that comes with it (thus not permanently mouted). Since this is a back-up and is not a required piece of equipment for IFR flight, it seems to me to be biggest bang for the buck.

 

If I decice to not get my IR, I will probably use the current electric AI hole to install an engine monitor (JPI 730 or 830) at a later date.

 

I have only had this plane a short while and just recently got my PPL in it.  I have been reading "Instrument Flying" to help me decide if I want to work towards an Instrument Rating so the bigger question may be IR or not?

 

I have 2 suggestions.  First - go out and fly your plane!  Enjoy it.  Take some cross countries, but not too far...  Go too far, and you'll invariably understand why you want that instrument rating.  You'll get stuck, or be rushing to beat the weather.  Remember, the weather doesn't have to be bad to ground a Visual pilot.  Just needs to be cloudy.

 

But then, if you enjoy travelling with the plane - and well, the Mooney is made for it, go get the IR.  It makes you safer IMHO, but very importantly it makes the airplane a real travelling machine.  I got stuck places all the time without my IR, which would have been trivial with...

 

good luck!

Greg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

gsengle,  I appreciate your suggestions. I flew an experimenatl that I built as a sport pilot from Dallas to CA  a couple of times and to Oshkosh twice. I  flew the Mooney to Sacramento about 6 weeks ago. I do like it as a traveling machine. I replaced the experimental with the Mooney to get more range and capacity. The plane is equipped with a Garmin 530W and autopilot with altitude hold so I think it would be a good platform to learn instruments in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.....I have been reading "Instrument Flying" to help me decide if I want to work towards an Instrument Rating so the bigger question may be IR or not?

 

There is NO question.

 

If you want to really enjoy you big new machine and master the skies rather than be a slave to it, get that instrument ticket soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.