Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

When I bought my 65 Mooney the latch was original and bent all to heck. I straightened it out and it was working ok but it really looked like a mess.  I finally completed the replacement.  I took a 1x1 piece of Aluminum and milled out a close part leaving a minimum of 1/8 in.  It works great.  I have an Autocad drawing and a PDF of the drawing that I'll post.


 Here is the links for the PDF and DWG files:


http://www.creativecomputersolutions.com/flying/baggage.pdf


http://www.creativecomputersolutions.com/flying/baggage.dwg


The drawing could be dimensioned better but it works....


BILL


 

post-12637-13468140731304_thumb.jpg

Posted

Doc--


That looks GREAT! Even though my AutoCAD 2007 can't open the dwg file . . . I need to check my own now. The one like this for the door needs to be redone, but it has a bearing in it. One too many passengers has leaned on the door while passing through, and I have bent it back into shape and Tri-Flow it regularly.

Posted

Scott,


No I did not. I did not want the same steel thing.  I have access to a machine shop and wanted to "play" some with the new Jet Milling Machine.  I did just buy a fuel selector cover from the "Mooney store" though.  I might play around with making a die and jig for that someday and make it out of an old coke can !!


Bill

Posted

You did a nice job on the arm. A lot of thought and engineering went into the strap.


Just to anyone else thinking about doing the same or similar, you should understand going into this that this does NOT meet the FAA criteria for owner supplied or owner fabricated parts, and, even when you do meet the criteria for owner fabricated parts, they are supposed to be installed by a licensed mechanic. If you have any questions read this article: http://150cessna.tripod.com/parts.html


If you put a new OEM arm or a used serviceabe arm on as a replacement, done properly, no one would ever know that the part was replaced, so there would be no reason for anyone to look for a logbook entry.


With a non standard part, it's pretty easy to see and might raise a question.


Great job, nice looking part, but I'd put the OEM factory part back on if you ever decide to sell the plane. 


Most of us who care for our aircraft and take care of them tend to drift into some grey areas of owner maintainence. 


I'm really not tryng to pick on a very well done job, but this is posted where other people reading it might not completly understand the regulations behind 'owner fabricated parts'.  


Flame away if you choose, but let's provide the 'rest of the story' to people who might otherwise not know the regulations.


Jim


 

Posted

IIRC the drawing has to be either approved data, such as your own, or accepted data, such as from the manufacturer.  We made some rudder pedal extensions with the factory drawings.

Posted

Quote: jwilkins

even when you do meet the criteria for owner fabricated parts, they are supposed to be installed by a licensed mechanic.

Posted

Quote: jwilkins

You did a nice job on the arm. A lot of thought and engineering went into the strap.

Just to anyone else thinking about doing the same or similar, you should understand going into this that this does NOT meet the FAA criteria for owner supplied or owner fabricated parts, and, even when you do meet the criteria for owner fabricated parts, they are supposed to be installed by a licensed mechanic. If you have any questions read this article: http://150cessna.tripod.com/parts.html

If you put a new OEM arm or a used serviceabe arm on as a replacement, done properly, no one would ever know that the part was replaced, so there would be no reason for anyone to look for a logbook entry.

With a non standard part, it's pretty easy to see and might raise a question.

Great job, nice looking part, but I'd put the OEM factory part back on if you ever decide to sell the plane. 

Most of us who care for our aircraft and take care of them tend to drift into some grey areas of owner maintainence. 

I'm really not tryng to pick on a very well done job, but this is posted where other people reading it might not completly understand the regulations behind 'owner fabricated parts'.  

Flame away if you choose, but let's provide the 'rest of the story' to people who might otherwise not know the regulations.

Jim

 

Posted

Quote: Clarence

I would submit that few if any aircraft in the fleet are "Airworthy" in the eyes of the FAA or any other regulator based on any number of items from illegal/ unapproved parts to impropper maintenance etc.

Clarence

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.