Yetti Posted Tuesday at 08:53 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 08:53 PM 31 minutes ago, eman1200 said: for the record, are there people who have replaced the oem master with the Lamar sts-m12? from the specs: "Silver Contacts provide 300A in-rush & 150A continuous-duty capability Much higher than OE units which is higher in-rush but fewer continuous. I think other than starting the plane this should be more than enough but just wanted to check. technically the one you have is rebuildable. Maybe. Taking the fuse out kind of means it is still working. You have another wire somewhere that was providing 12 volts to the master. It could have been as simple as water from the com panel falling on the master switch. I would spend some time with a test light/VOM before I replaced the solenoid. I would be replacing the master switch prior to the Master Relay. What the heck is that third relay for? That is not stock.
eman1200 Posted Tuesday at 09:02 PM Author Report Posted Tuesday at 09:02 PM 5 minutes ago, Yetti said: technically the one you have is rebuildable. Maybe. Taking the fuse out kind of means it is still working. You have another wire somewhere that was providing 12 volts to the master. It could have been as simple as water from the com panel falling on the master switch. I would spend some time with a test light/VOM before I replaced the solenoid. I would be replacing the master switch prior to the Master Relay. What the heck is that third relay for? That is not stock. we did plenty of multimeter zapping and right now everything is pointing to the relay. the switch seemed to be ok, although I don't think it would be a bad idea to replace it. the oem part has 4 posts as well. this is the 'new' one, which kind of lines up with how the existing one is wired. sort of:
Yetti Posted Tuesday at 09:13 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 09:13 PM 8 minutes ago, eman1200 said: we did plenty of multimeter zapping and right now everything is pointing to the relay. the switch seemed to be ok, although I don't think it would be a bad idea to replace it. the oem part has 4 posts as well. this is the 'new' one, which kind of lines up with how the existing one is wired. sort of: this would be the more accurate one https://peerlesselectronics.com/6041h105-relay?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=20663341848&gclid=CjwKCAjwlaTGBhANEiwAoRgXBbhuWKo-Lr1UUFUmSylE4m2OjCHjmOhe2gzIn47Nnb8yoD3thidkdxoCuMEQAvD_BwE sky geek is a little less dollars. https://skygeek.com/eaton-aerospace-6041h105-relay-12v-1-15-electromagnetic.html?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=13706325759&gclid=CjwKCAjwlaTGBhANEiwAoRgXBRz5hEL80QIv2peWx0foyLVmYs_eV-jhmk7bUAO7C4QKbzg-2ih1shoCJYwQAvD_BwE
Yetti Posted Tuesday at 09:15 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 09:15 PM started as cutler hammer bought by Eaton. At one point I found it at McMaster Carr for $200.00
eman1200 Posted Tuesday at 09:35 PM Author Report Posted Tuesday at 09:35 PM 20 minutes ago, Yetti said: this would be the more accurate one https://peerlesselectronics.com/6041h105-relay?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=20663341848&gclid=CjwKCAjwlaTGBhANEiwAoRgXBbhuWKo-Lr1UUFUmSylE4m2OjCHjmOhe2gzIn47Nnb8yoD3thidkdxoCuMEQAvD_BwE sky geek is a little less dollars. https://skygeek.com/eaton-aerospace-6041h105-relay-12v-1-15-electromagnetic.html?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=13706325759&gclid=CjwKCAjwlaTGBhANEiwAoRgXBRz5hEL80QIv2peWx0foyLVmYs_eV-jhmk7bUAO7C4QKbzg-2ih1shoCJYwQAvD_BwE I'm curious why you recommend those two, I see no specs on those links. so while yes, they 'look' the same, without specs how can you compare? I know other people have probably already done that, but other than mounting brackets, if the specs are the same but one is 1/4 the price...... it would be nice not to have to remount it but that's not worth the extra price to me. BUT, if that's simply the better choice, then that's what I'd go with. the one I listed is listed as the pma replacement for the cutler hammer according to lamar.
RangerM20 Posted yesterday at 12:19 AM Report Posted yesterday at 12:19 AM A '64 C model I worked on several years ago had this same problem. Turned out to be the master switch itself.
Justin Schmidt Posted yesterday at 12:29 AM Report Posted yesterday at 12:29 AM While people that don't know call everything a solenoid. In reality a solenoid uses electrical force into physical motion. Starter (what ingages with ring gear) is a solenoid.
Yetti Posted yesterday at 01:20 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:20 AM 3 hours ago, eman1200 said: I'm curious why you recommend those two, I see no specs on those links. so while yes, they 'look' the same, without specs how can you compare? I know other people have probably already done that, but other than mounting brackets, if the specs are the same but one is 1/4 the price...... it would be nice not to have to remount it but that's not worth the extra price to me. BUT, if that's simply the better choice, then that's what I'd go with. the one I listed is listed as the pma replacement for the cutler hammer according to lamar. What is the AP/IA comfortable signing off on is the best answer. We used to run high amperage solenoids to switch the power to high amperage radios. The metal cans would fail at a higher rate than the black plastic ones. 2
skykrawler Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago The solenoid in the master relay could be internally shorted to ground. I would remove the wire from the master relay that provides the ground path that energizes the relay (re: to master switch). If the relay opens it implies there is a a ground being applied through that wire from something other than the master switch. If it stays energized, it's probably an internal short to ground. 1
eman1200 Posted 20 hours ago Author Report Posted 20 hours ago The solenoid in the master relay could be internally shorted to ground. I would remove the wire from the master relay that provides the ground path that energizes the relay (re: to master switch). If the relay opens it implies there is a a ground being applied through that wire from something other than the master switch. If it stays energized, it's probably an internal short to ground. I’ll try this, ty.
Recommended Posts