PeteMc

"GBLB" engine? I know of the GB my K originally had and the LB when I did the engine. Not sure what a GBLB engine is.

In the M20J POH I looked at, it says approx. 12" MP (13-15 for the 231). If you have a PDF of your POH, try searching for "gear horn" and it should come up. To check it, you pull the power back in flight with the gear up. Adjustments might take a few flights if it got wacked or came loose and needed a major calibration.

I'm not sure of the specific units, but some GI 275 variants can be installed by an AP, others need to be installed in a Garmin shop. I think the difference might be with the ADAHRS and Auto Pilot versions.

Do you hear or feel it, or just see it on the instruments?

I still have my external DUAL GPS/ADS-B device from before I upgraded my panel. So that's my backup if I loose everything. So I don't have any need to have GPS in my iPad, but if you want it as just GPS backup, it is a consideration. As for updates, etc., I'm already paying for Internet in my phone, so no need to have it in my iPad that I might use once or twice a year. Not a lot of money, but I just don't see the need. I haven't had a Cellular GPS since they first came out, and it was only for that one iPad as I always had Internet and GPS from other sources.

Sure, if you HAVE a Tanis heater! And I get Paul New's point... But did he clarify how much "old" oil was really retained? My guess is that it is not much in reality. And if you're changing the oil frequently, is it really an issue? Well... I guess if you're having engine issues and you're always getting all sorts of crap in your oil, it might matter.

So 48oz, 1qt oil & 16oz of Cam Guard, got blown out the oil vent tube. You want to put 7qts in max at an oil change. Run the engine and make sure everything is okay and you may show 6-7 qts. Let it sit a day or more and then check, where you may find you have MORE than 7qts. Since you probably ran the engine to get the oil warm before the oil change, all the engine parts were still covered in oil. It will take a while in the TSIO-360 for that oil to move down out of the engine.

I'm guessing you may not have flown that many places or only smaller airports. Or you've been damn lucky! But in addition to NY I can actually pull up "landing fee" since the late 90 from: CA, MA, MD, MT, NH & TX. And I know I've paid landing fees in MULTIPLE other states, but it was just on the fuel bill and I didn't break it out. The ones I'm reasonably certain of are AZ, CO, IL, WY and maybe SD. I haven't paid any here in WA yet, but I have heard of a few airports that do charge them (BFI I believe is one). And I'm excluding the large Airports, I paid over $1,600 when I had to make an emergency landing at JFK when I lost a cylinder. I don't remember what the Landing Fee portion of that was, but it was up there. It may have been over $100 and I think partially because of the time of day I landed. The rest was Ramp and Service Fees for the time the plane was there while the mechanic figured out what was wrong, order the parts and then do the repairs so I could fly out. And if I remember correctly, they even cut me a break. Regretfully with so many St/Co/Cities cutting their budgets, fees have popped up at a lot of airports. Many are waved if you buy fuel or they are only a couple of bucks, so if you don't actually look at the fuel bill closely, it blends in with the other taxes and you may not notice it. I remember a Ramp fee in TX that was pretty high, maybe $8, and the FBO said it was the city's fee, not theirs and they could not wave it.

Now that's a reason for the Bill in MT or anywhere else. And as someone else said, it should be a Fed law. I've seen a bunch of thread pop up in all sorts or groups yelling and screaming about Vector being a "fee-based bottom-feeding" (sorry @dkkim73 ) because... They used technology to offer State, Co. City or whomever, a less expensive way to process their Landing Fees that they were going to send out anyway. And they used ADS-B because, sorry folks, they CAN. So the issue should be the first part of what dkkim73 pointed out "...prevent use of public ADS-B data for other than safety and navigational purposes..." and everyone should just stay away from the Landing Fees and Vector. That's just going to be "whining" in the view of those you want to get onboard to get behind any kind of ADS-B Bills throughout the States or Fed. And again, one big downside is that it is States, Cos & City governments that are probably the biggest clients of any company that wants to help with Landing Fees or any other kinds of billing in the future. There are a number of people in our Gov... and close associates that would love nothing more than to privatize ATC. So that ATC billing MIGHT be because you flew through someone's airspace as in other parts of the world. This is nothing new, they've been talking about it for years. But now they're in a position to potentially do it. (It's a shame how MOST of them (any side, any time) talk a great talk, then change when they get in "power." Then the few that are there to really do good, get rolled over.)

DON'T YELL AT THE MESSENGER.... Just pointing out that at the Airport I was based out of for a few decades (KFRG) had the Ops people sitting in the window listing to the Twr/CTAF and with binoculars to make sure they got the N# for the landing fee. If it was night and they didn't hear the N# and couldn't read it, they drove out on the ramp. KFRG is a NY State Airport. The Landing Fees are unlikely to go away. So my tax dollars were paying for this extra person to sit there with all the benefits and overhead above the salary. So the technology, IF DONE CORRECTLY, would save NY State residents money. Also, over the decades, there are a LOT of Airports that started charging Landing Fees that had nothing to do with ADS-B, so by blocking using ADS-B is not going to stop the landing fees, if anything, it is going to add the cost into the fee to do it manually. AGAIN, before you jump on me, think about it. Are the fees in MT, or anywhere else, going to stop because of the ban on ADS-B use for tracking landings at an Apt? As for Vector and the incorrect billing I've heard occasionally happens, I'd rather see a Bill that allowed me to charge for my time to correct that billing error!! As we're not going to stop the fees. Or maybe a Bill that required them to include a Pic of my plane actually ON the Runway included on the invoice.

Same thing for me. Figure out the MP setting for your plane that will give you the speed you want in the descent with the gear down. Then set for that power well before the FAF. About a half dot before intercepting the GS/GP I drop the gear and you start down as you intercept the GS/GP. Then, as the others have said, when you break out you can easily adjust the power to slow and add flaps as needed.

I had just seen him hit the snow berm the first time I watched it. Totally missed the wabbling wings and sudden increase in the sink rate in those last few seconds. But even so... I hope there's a new note for those that maintain B18 that there will be no snow berms at either end of the Rwy.

I had a -GB engine for a few years when I first got my plane and then went to the -LB. But from what I remember of the -GB, if you're only running at 29" and you're having problems keeping the cylinder below 400 degrees, something seems off. Is this from the single factory cylinder temp probe or do you have a JPI or some other engine monitor? With a stock -GB at 9.6g/hr, 31.8" and 2200 RPM, you'd be at 65% power (Best Economy). You're below that and the Intercooler should be bring your temps down below the stock engine. An even at a higher RPM with that fuel flow, you're even lower than 65%, so again, the 400 degrees seems strange. And if you've been going to the same mechanic for years, maybe you want to have someone one else take a look. For starters, I'd be checking to see if the temperature probe(s) are giving you the correct reading. Also, is the baffling sealing correctly or is there just no air going through the cooling fins. And I guess it could also be your Tach or MP gauge that are off. I'd say to check the Fuel Flow too, but you'd probably notice when you filled up if the 9.6g/hr was off.

Totally agree it is easier to see the other plane if it is out your left window. Just pointing out that not all Downwinds are on the Left. And not all Cubs, etc. will hear your call.

After I upgraded my panel I now have an Airspeed Bug that I don't really use. So I tagged the Gross Vbg speed and I just leave it there. So if something happens there's no reading the numbers, doubting myself that I'm remember the correct speed, etc. Push and go for the Bug. But once I'm there, assuming I'm up higher, I can think about how loaded I am and drop the speed a bit if I think I need the extra glide time. And I also have the ~11kt range, which may be true of all Mooneys. But I doubt I'd ever want to really guess how slow I could really go. So I'd probably only slow up a few knots, maybe 5 at the most even if I knew I was very light. As for FF or any other App that may be asking for Vbg. Your best bet is to put in the speed for Gross Weight.