All Activity
- Past hour
-
jamesyql started following Apology For Stupid Q. about Canada NAV Fees
-
Curious what makes you say that? As a newer pilot I have found the weather briefing services invaluable for helping me learn and stay safe. Especially mountain flying with such a multitude of variables that need to be considered. I don’t think I get billed more than $100 CAD ($20 USD ) for a year of service which obviously also includes FSS, FISE, towers, etc.
-
His "Al Mooney was 7 ft tall" one is the best.
-
It's not just electrical failure. There have been countless of incidents of the 650's locking up in flight. Leaving you with an unresponsive unit, unable to interact with it to so much as change a frequency. How will you "exit" IMC if you can't shoot an approach? The second radio is absolutely worth it, especially to someone like yourself who has limited IFR experience. It could save your life. Have the second radio hooked up to your standby loc/gs indicator there, so you're not stuck when the G5 konks out. The more redundancy you have the better.
- Today
-
Apology For Stupid Q. about Canada NAV Fees
Slick Nick replied to RonM's topic in General Mooney Talk
NavCan sucks. They're useless. -
@Captnmack Can you elaborate a little bit more on what you are after? Your new weight and CG should be all you need to enter into ForeFlight; it should have the default factory envelope limits. If not, you can get those from your POH.
- Yesterday
-
CO2 detectors the "Good The Bad and The Ugly
MikeOH replied to Jpravi8tor's topic in Vintage Mooneys (pre-J models)
Uh, YES IT IS! Just because YOURS and your SR22 buddy's are not is hardly evidence of GA as a whole! Look, I get it, YOU don't want to think there is anything wrong with YOUR plane, and you tell yourself that 10-20 ppm is not that dangerous (50 ppm is the OSHA 8 hour limit) but you are flying and at altitude the effects are likely more serious. Mine is zero in cruise, and just go back through this thread and look at all the individuals also with zero in cruise. It is NOT an anomaly to have zero. It's got nothing to do with how ancient our engine designs are; it's all about properly sealed cabins and healthy exhaust systems. -
1966 M20C Mk 21 1&1/4" Scat Tube Routing Question
47U replied to Dirty Bird's topic in Vintage Mooneys (pre-J models)
That is correct. Just stick the duct out the left exhaust cavity with all the other hoses. -
CO2 detectors the "Good The Bad and The Ugly
TaildraggerPilot replied to Jpravi8tor's topic in Vintage Mooneys (pre-J models)
If you are in cruise and you are reading anything over zero, there’s something up with your exhaust. On the ground, with some tailwinds and a door open, you’ll usually read something. -
CO2 detectors the "Good The Bad and The Ugly
Jackk replied to Jpravi8tor's topic in Vintage Mooneys (pre-J models)
Mine are all brand new too, 0 ain’t very real in GA even my friends 100ish TTSN SR22GTS was like 5-10 -
1966 M20C Mk 21 1&1/4" Scat Tube Routing Question
47U replied to Dirty Bird's topic in Vintage Mooneys (pre-J models)
Pics from 2010, when I did the carb heat overhaul kit that LASAR recommended. The carb heat flapper shaft was so worn that it was eating into the air box. I had to make a little patch for it. -
1966 M20C Mk 21 1&1/4" Scat Tube Routing Question
47U replied to Dirty Bird's topic in Vintage Mooneys (pre-J models)
Here’s a link to a Don Maxwell article on the vintage carb heat system. The pictures are missing, but the words describe pretty accurately. https://www.donmaxwell.com/carb-heat-systems -
I’m sure this is out there somewhere but I’m looking a more detailed W&B form so I can build an accurate profile in ForeFlight. Just re-weighed AC after major Avionics change and now have a useful load of 1026 lbs.
-
Retract Gear or Flaps First in a Go Around ?
Hank replied to donkaye, MCFI's topic in Modern Mooney Discussion
Yes, that's the right way to do it. -
Retract Gear or Flaps First in a Go Around ?
varlajo replied to donkaye, MCFI's topic in Modern Mooney Discussion
Corrected for actual landing weight? With 1/4 fuel and no passengers or luggage, my Vs0 is 10 mph lower than book. Actual Vs0 = Vs0(max landing weight) * sqrt(Actual Weight/Max Landing Weight) -
CO2 detectors the "Good The Bad and The Ugly
Paul Thomas replied to Jpravi8tor's topic in Vintage Mooneys (pre-J models)
My CFI has a fancy monitor and used it a couple times in my airplane. It's always read zero and being in FL, even with door open. -
Adam14 joined the community
-
Retract Gear or Flaps First in a Go Around ?
PT20J replied to donkaye, MCFI's topic in Modern Mooney Discussion
I’ve landed in pretty strong cross winds with no flaps, takeoff flaps and full flaps. They all work, but I like full flaps since it makes it just like any other landing. If gusty and the airspeed is bouncing around I just try to keep the lowest indications at 1.3Vso. -
christaylor302 started following 1966 M20C Mk 21 1&1/4" Scat Tube Routing Question
-
The reason that I haven't remote mounted mine is that I want to see the status lights for SXM, ADS-B, power, GPS, bluetooth. I also want to be able to reset or pair it if necessary also.
-
With you there! That's why I got GFC500... And even then I did weigh $$ vs benefit. Benefit is tremendous, and I'm glad I did it. There's no comparison to how I flew w/ my old S-Tec 40 and now. On the other hand - radio or GPS failure in my mind leads to immediate need of getting out of IMC as quickly as possible, and having ability to talk to tower or CTAF to land. Having secondary COM/GPS is very convenient in THAT EVENT, but does not really provide as high a guarantee as dual magnetos do for continued flight, for instance. Electrical failure risk remains, and it feels to me (perhaps incorrectly) it is likelier scenario than failures as seemingly narrow as radio/GPS (b/c alternator is mech device I guess?)... If I could have purely emergency cover for both that is also inexpensive - I would just continue enjoying failure free so far flying w/o large expense. Hence my hesitation. It is obvious, however, that options eval does continue in my mind! ;-) Itching to spend =)
-
If temps have come down break in is complete, cam guard to my best understanding is both, an anti scuffing agent and an anti corrosion agent, if you fly at least once a week you do not need the anti corrosion agent, gut feel I would give it one oil regular change interval, typically 25 or 50h depending on engine, before adding the camguard, others will chime in that know more