Bennett Posted July 19, 2012 Report Posted July 19, 2012 Many years ago I stupidly tried to twist and turn my way through a line of thunderstorms using my Stormscope, forgetting that the image was not tied to a gyro, and therefore what I saw, was not what I got. Never made that mistake again, and I will gladly fly well around thunderstorms. I now have XM (and soon Nexrad), but I won't use either of these to try and thread my way though T-Storm weather. Since I once took a lightning strike a bit more than 10 miles away from the nearest buildup, I am ever more wary. Quote
Oscar Avalle Posted July 19, 2012 Report Posted July 19, 2012 I have many times too. However, now that I am flying more and more in Central America I have to trust my WX 500 and my eyes. So if I can not see it... I don't fly through it. Quote
Earl Posted July 20, 2012 Report Posted July 20, 2012 I have no problem with IMC and I know a lot of airline captains that fly SPIFR in single engine planes all the time. Having said that, I am not going to fly in an are of embedded t-storms in IMC, even though I have XM weather and a stormscope. My rule with t-storms is I need to see it to believe it....or more to the point avoid it. That is really not that limiting a factor to productive flying, even in the SE where I live. Quote
jetdriven Posted July 20, 2012 Report Posted July 20, 2012 After you stumble through an embedded thunderstorm you quickly realize the benefit or using either the Mark I eyeball or onboard radar. I managed to punch through the top of one at FL410 in north Africa on a dark night a couple years ago. The first bang was the entire airplane getting slammed upward. I looked down and the airspeed was into the barber pole, the Mach was .91-something and the altimeter showed a 1500 foot gain in just a few seconds. And then it was over. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.