I must respectfully disagree with George Perry’s assertions that: “… I don't think military leadership is touchy feely at all. We hold one another to a standard. Depart from that standard and the punishment is swift and irrevocable.”
First, the military is highly politically correct.
It follows orders (operational and philosophical), which come from the civilian leadership. The failure, in 1991, of the flag officers of all the services to “fall on their swords” over the travesty of Tailhook was an example of PC at the highest levels. (It could be argued, though, that Adm Mullen and the JCS’s recent kitten-like capitulation over DADT now holds the prize.)
The most tragic case of military PC is how the Army handled Maj Nidal Hasan. As GenJack Keane testified, the military "failed to deal with radicalization" as Hasan's "open displays of violent Islamist extremism was a violation of military rules," and (he) should have been discharged.
Second, that “my service has fired 23 Senior leaders for various lapses in judgment” can indicate a process of promotion and selection for command that has been vitiated by PC. Would Capt Holly Graf or Cmdr Etta Jones been selected for command, were it not for PC?
Third, punishment is not always swift. Capt Graf had a long history of erratic, bizarre, and sub-standard performance but retired as an O-6 last year (six years after being relieved of command), despite a panel of three admirals having recommended she be cashiered. (Of course, it helps to have an admiral for an older sister.)
Fourth, I am certainly no apologist for drunken driving, but relieving a highly experienced officer with combat experience for a DWI sacrifices the mission and personnel safety on the altar of PC.
Fifth, Babbit, though he “was resigned,” not fired, isn’t, to my knowledge, being paid.
Pardon the rant. It’s rainy and cold in the NE.