jaylw314

Have you ever used it to overcome insufficient rudder authority? I've never had the opportunity or bravery to attempt that As I said, it's worth a read if you can find it

Aside from the fact that this competes for one of the longer necro posts I've seen in a while, I don't understand what you mean by "most effective is the rudder." If anything, it is the least effective attitude control. In one of Barry Schiff's "The Proficient Pilot" articles (I don't know the issue, but it's in the 1980 compilation book of the same name), he suggests a modified version of the "kickout" for crosswind landings. Rather than the wings-level kickout that airliners use, he proposed a crabbed approch with a dynamic sideslip entry just before touchdown, low enough so the upwind wheel touching down interrupts the slip, and claims he landed a Cherokee 140 in 35 knot crosswinds at KSMO. While I've never attempted this IRL, I have tried it in flight sims. One point he does not mention is that the dynamic entry seems to allow for more crosswind compensation than you would normally have the rudder authority for. So while the M20J seems to run out of rudder authority for a sustained sideslip around 15-20 knots of crosswind at typical approach speeds, a dynamic entry will swing your nose around even further than that, at least for a couple seconds, during which you hopefully touch down. It's worth a read if you can find it.

Do you have a link to the NTSB report for us less adept at Google-fu? TIA!

If they are new sensors, that increases the probability that they are incorrectly installed or in the wrong order. Double check your FF calibration constant as well. Otherwise, the temps don't look bad.

If it's not a career path, just do things at your own pace and enjoy the ride. A day in a 1970 Cherokee puttering along at 100 kts is still far better than being stuck on the ground in the office

I financed with Lake Michigan Credit Union (formerly Pilot Bank of Florida) about 8 years ago at 4.0% with 15% down payment

It was stated as a general caveat, not an instruction. I thought that was communicated clearly but apparently it didn't come across

The HP % on the EDM 830 is just calculated from other parameters (MAP, RPM, FF, OAT). There's a HP constant in the programming menu that requires calibration for your motor, otherwise it could be completely useless. There's a section on it in the manual, but basically set 70% power in flight according to your POH, then change the HP constant until the HP % actually shows 70%. That obviously presumes those other parameters and their sensors are also themselves calibrated correctly (thinkin' of you, FF). Also note that this number is completely useless anyways if you're in a different leaning phase, e.g. if you calibrate it while 125F ROP, it is useless to use at full rich or any other setting. So if you want to use HP %, calibrate it in the mixture state (like full rich) you want, then remember it is only useful at that mixture.

It does sound like there's something wonky. The low EGT's suggests those cylinders aren't firing all the time or firing poorly. I recall getting up to 16.5k', and didn't have any trouble setting mixture or low EGT's. That being said, I was running at 2700 RPM and shooting for best power (mostly just by listening to the motor). I was putzing around at 15.5k' once testing my O2 and checking speeds, when I heard approach call me out to an airliner climbing out of PDX. The pilot sounded surprised and a little flummoxed when he called visual on me, so I wonder if there's a tendency to relax above 10k' MSL thinking 'phew, at least I don't have to worry about those single-engine maniacs anymore!'

My quote from Old Republic was just over $2000 this year, compared to $2400 in 2023, and $2100 in 2022 (although that was a different company), FWIW. I was a little suprised by that

I'd suspect the movement of air when the pistons start sucking also helps vaporize a fair amount of the liquid gasoline in the intake (and is probably a larger effect the faster the starter turns).

I recall having interest in the Deltahawk diesel when I first started my RV project in 2010. Since then, I bought the Mooney and Van's has gone into bankruptcy, but I keep checking every now and then to see if the RV-10 FF kit is available yet...

I guess I was kind of the opposite, during my IFR training, the first time in actual IMC with the hood off I couldn't get enough of it. I tried to schedule as many dual instruction days in bad weather as I could. The visual sensation of speed and the textures of clouds sliding past is something I could watch all day

Congratulations and good luck! If you're lucky, the prop won't need an overhaul, 2019 is a pretty recent IRAN. Heck, I'd probably avoid an IRAN unless there was something outwardly amiss given my experiences

Was that report verified? I thought I read in the initial statements there was no pilot statement or information released as to the time he may have ingested any mushrooms? AFAIK intentionally taking an illegal substance is not a great defense to criminal charges

I cycle the prop twice, even though I know I only need to do it once. The second time is to convince myself the first one wasn't just in my imagination

Why was a 337 filed for the repair unless there had been an airworthiness problem? Wouldn't that just be a logbook entry for minor repair if it wasn't? And if it was a major repair noted in the logbooks, I would expect somebody looking for airworthiness issues to review major repairs, right?

Novus #1 is good, but I have to admit, I probably use it once a year. Otherwise, it's just a couple drops of car wash soap in a half gallon of water. Mist liberally, let sit for a few minutes, then wipe off with a rolled up microfiber towel. I've just been using the same towel, I'll wash it every couple months.

That all makes sense to me, but if no fuel seeps after short time like that, how could the engine catch again with the mixture closed? I haven't rewatched the video, does he actually give it mixture before the engine catches?

People have mentioned before that the burbling you can hear after shutdown is some of the fuel seeping out of the fuel nozzles. Not 100% sure if it's just that, but I suppose if you hear that it'd be a sign if you startup thereafter to try your hot start technique first

The download size for GNS 4xx/5xx units is pretty tiny, I think the aviation database for WAAS is under 8MB. Yes, I know that is larger than the capacity of supercomputers in the 80's but downloading it by phone tethering shouldn't be an issue

That makes sense, although I suppose he could have been pulling off to the ramp to find the offending guy and do some face-punching . Not that I'd advocate for that, but it would certainly come to mind if I was there. Listening a little more closely, I think you can hear the parachute motor, so that suggests that if the plane was taking off you should be able to hear his/her motor as well, so you're probably right.

I couldn't tell from the video if the plane was landing first, or rejected a takeoff because of the parachute.

I'd also point out the landing aircraft does have right of way, and if @amillet could see him and point the camera, he was probably pretty visible to the aircraft on the runway, unless he suddenly turned onto final or climbed from behind trees. I also worried about whether the two were playing chicken, but hard to tell any of that without knowing what the landing guy was doing before the clip

I can sort of see that since density altitude is usually due to higher temp, and higher temps actually increases the height of the proverbial air column. Haven't thought that one through though