IvanP

That looks ugly. Hope all occupants will recover from the injuries.

It seems that courtesy cars are rather rare these days (at least at the airports that I have been to lately) as are decent airport restaurants.

I would be curious how could the IA sign off the aircraft with dented push rot tubes without noting it in the discrepancies.

There are some Mooney CB's who spent several hundred dollars on a sticker saying that it is OK to put paint stripper (aka G100UL) in their tanks

The 2-3 ft swing out at 175 mph was probably pilot's perception under rather unusual circumstances. I tried to open cabing door in flight once at much slower speed to retrieve a seatbelt and was not able to get more than few inches (of course, I was not able to close the door either). Our minds tend to play tricks on us under stress .

While that may be true, it is also true for props installed on certificated aircraft. Just becasue something is installed on certifcated aircraft does not mean that bad things did not happen to it. Of course, I understand the CYA approach taken by the manufacturer and the reasons for it. Sucks for the OP, though.

Here is anothe great "deal" on Mooney part - Nose gear bolt for cool $375 plus shipping. https://lasar.com/hardware-bolts/machined-bolt-nose-gear-914004-000

Most likely fake news, but it would be nice to see new Mooneys roll off the line again.

According to the IPC, some Bravos had shuttle valve on dual brake installation (s/n 27-0108 to 27-0143).

To determine if the plug is the issue, you can just take the plug out and taxi around to check if the brakes are still soft. I seem to recall that my plug has a small hole in it.

Strange. I would still check the clearance betwen the middle doors and caliper when applying brakes to see how much clearance you have there. Also, check the bleeding procedure for dual brakes. There is a shuttle valve between the pilot and co-pilot side.

If you have the dual puck brakes on your Bravo, you may want to check your brake linings. I have been chasing similar issue on my Bravo last year. One side would just be soft and I had to pump the brakes couple of times to get good braking action. Inspection did not show any leaks. Bled the brakes 3 times to no avail. Always tested good in the hangar while bleeding, but then got soft again on taxi. Then I noticed that my brake linings were a bit thin on the affected side and the caliper had to travel to the point that it would push against the middle gear door (there is very little celarance there). The door would flex enough to allow the brake to bite, but then the pressure would push the caliper back in, hence the need to give it couple of pumps for the brakes to be firm. Replaced the linings and the caliper is now not touching the door when brakes are applied. All is good now. Because you need to remove the middle doors to get to the brake caliper, I did not spot the problem until I had someone apply the brakes while I was watching the caliper movement without removing the middle doors.

Both great planes. Hopefully they will continue to suport the existing fleet.

Nice J...but still a J with engine past its half-life for Bravo or Ovation price. Lot of effort and money went into this plane for sure, but is seem a bit overpriced to me even with all the gadgets and very nice interior.

I have owned 1970 E with 200HP IO 360 for over 15 years with mission parameters very similar to yours. It was a great machine that carried us in relative comfort to many destinations in US and Mexico. My wife and I loved that plane. Good fuel economy and reatively reasonable maintenance costs. Mine had bladders put in for 54 gal usable and I could take full fuel and reasonable amount of luggage for 2 people for xc trips. That provided enough fuel for 3-4 hr legs when flying xc with reasonable reserves. Changed to Bravo couple of years ago. WHile the Bravo is great when it comes to speed and the ability to climb high over mountains and weather, fuel economy is nowhere near what the E provided and given the amount of fuel I need to carry, it si essentially 2-people plane at best.

I will have to check the flap alignment in closed position as I never have the flaps closed on the ground. Thanks for the tip.

Cyl #2 in my Bravo is always the lowest temp in all phases of flight. Recent baffling (3 yrs), CHTs stay below 400F in climb at 110-120 KIAS. In cruise on high power, I need to crack open the cowl flaps a bit to keep CHT on my hottest cylinder (#5) below 400F. I run ROP - too chicken for LOP.

That is my primary concern. The in-flight fires that we can see on the videos appear to have occurred in airliners where there is relatively ample space and resources to handle such situation. Mooney cabin with a single pilot - not so much. The idea of handling a burning object in small cabin while controlling a plane is certainly not very appealing.

Are there any documented instances of in-flight cabin fire in Mooney? My cursory search did not come up with anything. It would be interesting to know how the pilot handled the situation, regardless of the cause of the fire.

I recall that lithium tends to react with water quite violently and thus water should probably not be used in an attempt to extinguish buring Li-ion battery. Given the close quarters of our cabins and the violent nature of such fire, my take on this particular risk is that prevention is of the utmost importance. For those of us who fly with supplemental oxygen the risk of catastrophic outcome of electrical fire in cabin is even higher. I am havuing hard time imagining a successful in-flight mitigation of LI-ion battery fire in Mooney cabin, especially if it occurs when the pilot is the only occupant of the plane. My battery safety approach - DO NOT drop battery or device. If dropped and/or damaged - immediately remove from service and replace, avoid devices that have known issues wth overheating, inspect batteries and devices for any signs of damage prior to each flight, avoid charging in flight if possible or use low charge rate power supply to avoid excess heating if in-flight cahrging is absolutely necessary. I use Garmin Aera 760 which has about 6+ hrs of battery life when fully charged so I do not connect it to the plane's power at all. The unit is always in a protective case until mounted to its cockpit holder to avod accidental damage. I-phone is in my pocket and not charged during flight.

The obvious answer would be to not use a device that is known to have thermal issues (iPad). If that cannot be avoided for whatever reason, then the burn bag would appear to be the next best option. I have no idea who designed the fire extinguisher bracket and location for long body Mooneys (behind the pilot seat). I tried to reach the extinguisher just for practice on the ground few times and my conclusion is that it would be rather difficult, if not impossible, to do while flying the plane in emergency situation. The thought of in-flight cabin fire is very frightening. My E had the extinguisher mounted between the seats within easy reach of pilot and co-pilot.

Now I just need to find the time to pry tho old ones out witout screwing up recent paint job and glue the new ones in

I just got 2 of these for my Bravo after being on the waitlist for about a year. Paid $350 for them (incl shipping). Not a grounding item, but annoying enough for me to see the broken gauge every time I fuel the plane that I justified the expense.

Very sad end for a new Mooney owner. Hopefully we will some day learn what was the cause of this tragic event, the various conjectures published here and elsequere notwithstanding. It is possible that the fuel system issues discussed on MS forum earlier were nt resplved and may have been the cause of this accident, but it is also possible that some other factors were involved. Too early to tell with any reasonable degree of certainty, but celarly the absence of facts will not prevent various "experts" from publishing conjectures and speculations.

According to the PR blurp published by LASAR that touted "transparency" and other corporate BS, the price of all Mooney produced parts was going up by 30%. So much for honesty and transparency - 30% declared increase vs 1000% actual increase. -