rturbett Posted April 14, 2010 Report Posted April 14, 2010 Can anyone give me a ballpark figure on the cost of a top overhaul for a 66 C? At what compression numbers are you deciding its time to be done? What would you consider to be an acceptable oil burn rate? Are the numbers much different for an E or F? Thanks, Rob Turbett Quote
KSMooniac Posted April 14, 2010 Report Posted April 14, 2010 Cylinders for the E/F/J cost twice as much as the C because Lycoming is the sole source supplier of those. The C jugs have some aftermarket options. Minimum acceptable compression per Lycoming is 60/80, I believe, although many folks wouldn't be comfortable flying with those values. Maximum oil burn rate per Lycoming is in the neighborhood of 1 qt/hr, too, and many folks wouldn't like that either. I'd also add that a full cylinder replacement might not be warranted if you find a good shop that will work on jugs and only repair items as necessary instead of just swapping entire jug assemblies. It is entirely possible that changing valve guides and making sure the valves seat properly are good enough, along with a cylinder hone and new rings. I had this done on my cylinders last year for ~$1500 for all 4, plus new pistons (+$600) and one new exhaust valve ($150 I think). (R&R labor not included) New cylinders for me would have been ~$7500 + labor. You can do some shopping here: http://www.aeroinstock.com/products/Cylinders/45/0/product_cat/index.html Quote
GeorgePerry Posted April 14, 2010 Report Posted April 14, 2010 Quote: rturbett Can anyone give me a ballpark figure on the cost of a top overhaul for a 66 C? At what compression numbers are you deciding its time to be done? What would you consider to be an acceptable oil burn rate? Are the numbers much different for an E or F? Quote
mjc Posted April 14, 2010 Report Posted April 14, 2010 Quote: GeorgePerry Usually Top Overhauls are performed because the compression on one or more cyclinders has dropped off. There are exceptions to this rule but for brevity sufice to say that "Perfect" compression is 80. So good compression for a Non Turbo charged piston aircraft engine is typically in the mid to high 70's. Anything in the mid to low 60's is not so good and anyting in the 50's = park it. Just as important as the compressions is oil analysis. If an engine has a cyclinder go from high to low compression its probably making metal. Having the Oil looked at will verify this. Quote
GeorgePerry Posted April 15, 2010 Report Posted April 15, 2010 Agreed...One compression test does not make a bad jug. But if there are multiple checks in conjunction with high oil consuption then it's probably time to do some maintenance. Quote
rturbett Posted April 15, 2010 Author Report Posted April 15, 2010 My intuition tells me that the cylinders should all be in the same gerneral range. If one or two show numbers very diferent, then you need to investigate. Is there a particular cylinder on a mooney that has a reputation for wearing first?(Lycoming) Rob Quote
mjc Posted April 15, 2010 Report Posted April 15, 2010 George, thanks for clarifying your thoughts; I see now we agree. Also, I found the source of the 60/80="low compression" data, in Lycoming's Key Reprints (http://www.lycoming.com/support/tips-advice/key-reprints/pdfs/Key Maintenance.pdf): A loss in excess of 25% of the 80 lbs., or a reading of 60/80 is the recommended maximum allowable loss. (Page 13) Mike Busch isn't a fan of Lycoming's guidance and explains his thoughts in http://www.avweb.com/news/savvyaviator/savvy_aviator_56_before_you_yank_that_jug_197497-1.html. As for all cylinders turning in similar compression readings, I've also heard that if one is widly different it may be an indication of a problem (especially if the compression loss is due to a valve leak). I don't know if any one tends to be more problem-prone than others. Problems with different areas of the baffling will affect different cylinders. Quote
rturbett Posted April 15, 2010 Author Report Posted April 15, 2010 Great article. That definitely increased my knowledge on cylinder compression. on a side note, do you have to drink two bottles of that powerful laxitive before having the boroscope done? Quote
sreid Posted August 26, 2012 Report Posted August 26, 2012 Quote: KSMooniac I'd also add that a full cylinder replacement might not be warranted if you find a good shop that will work on jugs and only repair items as necessary instead of just swapping entire jug assemblies. It is entirely possible that changing valve guides and making sure the valves seat properly are good enough, along with a cylinder hone and new rings. I had this done on my cylinders last year for ~$1500 for all 4, plus new pistons (+$600) and one new exhaust valve ($150 I think). (R&R labor not included) New cylinders for me would have been ~$7500 + labor. Quote
KSMooniac Posted August 27, 2012 Report Posted August 27, 2012 Steve, I used Midwest Aircraft Services in Newton. (316) 283-5915 They aren't a very sophisticated shop in that they don't have a web presence, but I'm satisfied with the work they did 3+ years later. I did the R&R in my hangar, and drove them to the shop since they were a relatively short drive for me. I'm sure you could ship them easily from OP, KS too. Quote
sreid Posted August 27, 2012 Report Posted August 27, 2012 Sounds like they did good work for you, and the location is relatively convenient. There doesn't seem to be anybody that does cylinder work around KC anymore. Thanks for the contact info, I will give them a call. Steve Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.