
AndyFromCB
Verified Member-
Posts
2,155 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Store
Everything posted by AndyFromCB
-
Me not like John, are you crazy? If I didn't like him, I would not call him all these terrible things. That would just be mean. I think you're missing the point, Anthony...Plus I am a fully blown Catholic myself, just non practicing, non believing, Catholic non the less and fiercely proud of it. Should find my first communion pictures somewhere ;-)
-
I'm sorry, once again, incorrect. At FL280 it would have been unable to maintain altitude but the autopilot will fly a straight course just fine in a KA with an engine out. It is possible that the autopilot would have stalled it at FL280 attempting to maintain altitude. Don't remember the details of what envelope protection ProLine 21 has. Part of memory checklist is to flip on the autopilot during engine out in order to run the real checklist, if level in cruise and autopilot off. Engine out or not, you flip the autopilot on, just either change pitch or IAS held. I really think you underestimate the amount of power KA350 has to climb on one and that it is equipped with both rudder boost and yaw damper aka 3rd axis. It will fly a full coupled approach on one, including going missed. Just checked the checklist, actually, it's 10 degrees pitch for engine out initial climb to 400ft. That's more than most mooneys can muster. No requirement to disconnect the autopilot during engine failure.
-
I'm not, remember, I'm still hoping for Rand Paul. If he makes it, he has my vote. If not, then I won't vote, but most likely contribute to HC. Did not write the speech. As incoherent as you claim for it to be, it's probably still better than what I could produce. Too many languages in my head to be any good at one. But if it upset you, I probably would agree with what said, academically speaking, that is.
-
I missread the report...
-
Commuter category aircraft is actually required to be able to perform missed approach in landing configuration with one engine inop. Here are the certification rules. Considerably more stringent than what Jose pointed out for light twins. They don't apply to the crashes ATR anyway. ATR is a Part 25 aircraft, with even more stringent requirements. §23.67 Climb: One engine inoperative. (d) For jets over 6,000 pounds maximum weight in the normal, utility and acrobatic category and commuter category airplanes, the following apply: (1) Takeoff; landing gear extended. The steady gradient of climb at the altitude of the takeoff surface must be measurably positive for two-engine airplanes, not less than 0.3 percent for three-engine airplanes, or 0.5 percent for four-engine airplanes with— (i) The critical engine inoperative and its propeller in the position it rapidly and automatically assumes; (ii) The remaining engine(s) at takeoff power; (iii) The landing gear extended, and all landing gear doors open; (iv) The wing flaps in the takeoff position(s); (v) The wings level; and (vi) A climb speed equal to V2. (2) Takeoff; landing gear retracted. The steady gradient of climb at an altitude of 400 feet above the takeoff surface must be not less than 2.0 percent of two-engine airplanes, 2.3 percent for three-engine airplanes, and 2.6 percent for four-engine airplanes with— (i) The critical engine inoperative and its propeller in the position it rapidly and automatically assumes; (ii) The remaining engine(s) at takeoff power; (iii) The landing gear retracted; (iv) The wing flaps in the takeoff position(s); (v) A climb speed equal to V2. (3) Enroute. The steady gradient of climb at an altitude of 1,500 feet above the takeoff or landing surface, as appropriate, must be not less than 1.2 percent for two-engine airplanes, 1.5 percent for three-engine airplanes, and 1.7 percent for four-engine airplanes with— (i) The critical engine inoperative and its propeller in the minimum drag position; (ii) The remaining engine(s) at not more than maximum continuous power; (iii) The landing gear retracted; (iv) The wing flaps retracted; and (v) A climb speed not less than 1.2 VS1. (4) Discontinued approach. The steady gradient of climb at an altitude of 400 feet above the landing surface must be not less than 2.1 percent for two-engine airplanes, 2.4 percent for three-engine airplanes, and 2.7 percent for four-engine airplanes, with— (i) The critical engine inoperative and its propeller in the minimum drag position; (ii) The remaining engine(s) at takeoff power; (iii) Landing gear retracted; (iv) Wing flaps in the approach position(s) in which VS1 for these position(s) does not exceed 110 percent of the VS1for the related all-engines-operated landing position(s); and (v) A climb speed established in connection with normal landing procedures but not exceeding 1.5 VS1.
-
I stand corrected. I did my search in US and Europe only. Apparently was not a take off issue. Problem started at FL280. Weird. Sudden decompression? Unlikely in a cabin this size. In cruise a FL280 you're indicating well over Vmc. The thing is certified to FL350 although it wallows and just feels weird up that high.
-
I don't need any kids to help me stay fat. It's 7pm and wife is still at the gym. As long as she stays skinny, I'm fine. No John, no kids. They cramp one's lifestyle way too much for my tastes. I'm too old anyway to bother. Bad enough we have two dogs. Anyways, gots to go make meatballs and pasta if I'm to get my BJ ;-)
-
No, I have not lost my mind. Essentially you are stating that only your sensibilities are being offended. Your physical well being or well being of your property is not being threatened in any way, shape or form by gays being allowed to marry. Correct? Well, then case closed. You don't get to claim you are being affected by this what so ever, in the present reality, and as such you have no standing. Simple as that. That's called freedom and it is you who is trying to deny to others. They are not denying your physical freedom in any way, share or form. An assault on your sensibilities is not an assault on your freedom. You faith is an assault on my faith and many others. But it not an assault on my freedom and vice versa. Meeting the demands of "gay mafia" do not affect your physical freedom in any way, shape or form. I am just simply pointing out John that you would not know what freedom is if it hit you. You don't stand for it. You stand for conformity to one mould.
-
I'm sorry, but do the same christian business owners require a marriage certificate from the couples entering their business, or certificate of virginity from couples unable to produce the former. How about note of good standing with their priest or pastor. How about a breathalyzer results from last 15 minutes.
-
Change of subject. Look what's happening in the middle east. Cats and dogs sleeping together. We stepped back a bit and now they are starting to work together cleaning up their own neighborhood. Funny, ha? Maybe a bit of chaos what is exactly what was needed...They no longer have a common enemy in us.
-
My eyes did not roll. I know you see the picture pretty clearly. I wish I could join in the good fight for smaller, more efficient fed, but you know how I feel about the whole enemy of my enemy thing. Libertarians need to detach themselves clearly from bigotry and prejudice, and then waves would be made in polls. There is no need to pander to extremely religious right in order to win anything, in fact, it's holding the ideas back.
-
Talking about yourself? Apparently married gay couples all over the US of A are keeping you up at night and are intruding on you and your ability to function. You have never demonstrated how. Please do not mention your beliefs. Mention how it affects you physically. What's in your head does not matter. Obviously your very existence and beliefs give me a lot of mental anguish. I do not see any court in the nation granting me any relief. What is the gay mafia doing?
-
So because there exists something real, like homosexuality, we should defer to your made up bullshit doctrine just because it's old? John, let me once and for all, unequivocally state, fuck your christian doctrine outside of your 4 walls. That's where believing in fairies stops having any effect on society. Funny how your doctrine is the correct one, based on what? Based on what? Not one shred of evidence. Once again, you can do whatever you want in the privacy of your own 4 walls. In your case, it appears you choose not to do a lot of things. More power to you. Once again, fuck your christian doctrine outside of your 4 walls and outside of your head. Religious freedom has wrongly been deemed a right as far as I am concerned. You make a lot of choice daily. One more is not going to kill you.
-
To recover what? A KA350 doesn't need to recover shit, it will climb to 20,000 on one engine at gross weight? Commuter category aircraft are certified to essentially same standards as jets. Are you really this dense? Have you ever been in a KA? There is nothing to do but fly. Auto feather and rudder boost. You probably would not even notice you lost one. Do you know what v1 cut is? How often do you see 900fpm minute in your Mooney? Not very often I bet. First step when you lose one is to pitch down a tad, to about 8 degrees nose up (still better than your Mooney) and throw the autopilot on and pull out the checklist and then ask to get you coffee while you browse thru the checklist. That's how eventful loosing an engine after v1 is in a King Air. Clouds or not clouds, one or two running, you got your flight director one for take off, don't you? Are you just being dense on purpose? There has never been a KA350 crash. Never. Not once.