bcg
Supporter-
Posts
716 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Store
Everything posted by bcg
-
Another member sent me a PM about that, he posted on Beechtalk on the 18th. I think that's great, from everything I know about it, it's a very good product. When I ordered the kit, a Google search wasn't bringing them up and the site was still dead. It'll be a fun project anyway.
-
I started reading this and immediately thought "but CO2" and then you addressed it at the end...lol Sent from my Pixel 9 Pro XL using Tapatalk
-
31 pounds for the AC stuff, 21 for the battery. The Ecoflow is 50 pounds with battery so, it's a wash there. I'm using a 100Ah LifePO4 for.the buffer battery. That should handle ground ops and then recharge some in flight. I see this as really running off the battery with the alternator just charging that more than running off the airplane electrical. That's how the Ecoflow runs, it uses its own battery and I have a 10A charging cable going to it. For this, I'd run heavier wire on its own 50A breaker, like the PlaneAC called for. I haven't figured out what yet but, I'm going to put some sort of electrical isolation on so this won't cause any feedback to the electrical system. Might be as simple as a couple of diodes, I need to dig into that more. Sent from my Pixel 9 Pro XL using Tapatalk
-
Not long ago, this back wall unit was advertised in my FB feed. I thought it was a self contained 24v AC at first and sent it to @LANCECASPER thinking maybe it could be an alternative since PlaneAC is no more. Turned out it was just the head unit part but, it sent me down a rabbit hole trying to reverse engineer the PlaneAC. I've been using the Ecowave Flow 2 and it's ok but, not great. Really, it's only good for the person it's blowing directly on, with 2 people in the plane someone is going to sweat. When my wife is with me, I'm the one sweating. I came across some 12v AC kits with electric compressors, they need 60ish amps at 12v to run, which would be borderline for my alternator however, with a buffer battery I think I can make it work. So I ordered one to work out a prototype and see if it's possible. The condenser is going to be my biggest challenge, the one that comes with it is probably too large...unless I can talk my IA into letting me mount it in the tail and sign it off for me with a 337. I'd just need a couple of small holes in the baggage compartment bulkhead to pass the refrigerant lines through and a new W&B. It doesn't change anything structurally, I'll have a chat with him and see what he thinks. I'd say my odds of convincing him are 50/50, at best but, he can't say yes if I don't ask. If he says no way, then I'll figure out a way to fully self contained like PlaneAC did Anyway, like the Mooney Mover, this will be a share as I go project. It's going to take a little while to work it all out. If anyone has suggestions for a more compact condenser, I'd be interested. Something with double rows could work. This is supposed to be a 10,000 BTU system and this one is actually a heat pump because the cool only was unavailable. Any comments and/or suggestions are welcome.
-
Vibration dampening for PAR46 landing lights?
bcg replied to bcg's topic in Vintage Mooneys (pre-J models)
I'll try a heat shield, it certainly can't hurt and heat is just as likely as vibration. Thanks for the suggestion. -
Vibration dampening for PAR46 landing lights?
bcg replied to bcg's topic in Vintage Mooneys (pre-J models)
Ah yeah, their site seems to be having issues. It won't open at all for me at the moment. Sent from my Pixel 9 Pro XL using Tapatalk -
Vibration dampening for PAR46 landing lights?
bcg replied to bcg's topic in Vintage Mooneys (pre-J models)
I can believe that, I've seen vibration roll properly torqued nuts right off a bolt on heavy equipment. Sent from my Pixel 9 Pro XL using Tapatalk -
Vibration dampening for PAR46 landing lights?
bcg replied to bcg's topic in Vintage Mooneys (pre-J models)
Spinner? In confused. The first link is a PAR46 sized rubber gasket. Second link, which is broken on the server side right now, is for a piece of clear acrylic that covers the landing light recess to allegedly reduce the wind buffet on the lamp. Sent from my Pixel 9 Pro XL using Tapatalk -
Vibration dampening for PAR46 landing lights?
bcg replied to bcg's topic in Vintage Mooneys (pre-J models)
I think it's a year, if I remember right. First one died outside that, this one only lasted 8-9 months. I'm going to see if I can get them to warranty it. I did get a different brand this time, the problem though is that the Aero is $200 and the Whelen is $400. I'm scared to spend more and end up with the same short life. Sent from my Pixel 9 Pro XL using Tapatalk -
Vibration dampening for PAR46 landing lights?
bcg replied to bcg's topic in Vintage Mooneys (pre-J models)
I have a C model (stole this pic of an E, it's the same setup) with the light in the lower right. It's got 2 adjusting screws in the back and has a retaining ring that goes inside the recess right next to the light that's held in with 4 sheet metal screws and tinnerman nuts. Does what you're showing work with that? It looks to me like it's more for the J model where the light is in the center? I may be mistaken though, so please correct me if I'm wrong. Sent from my Pixel 9 Pro XL using Tapatalk -
Vibration dampening for PAR46 landing lights?
bcg replied to bcg's topic in Vintage Mooneys (pre-J models)
I don't even fly at night. About 50% of the time, I turn it on when I'm on final. Mine just die. The first one would work sometimes and other times not. Usually, it would not on preflight and then would after flying for a while, I thought it was a wiring issue. I replaced all the wiring and breakers when I redid my panel and it made no difference. This time, it just failed, no intermittent. The only thing I can come up with is vibration is killing it, I'm open to other theories though. It's super annoying because my OCD won't let me just live with it failed even though I don't need it. I like flying a squawk free airplane, it took me 2 years to clear up every one of them after I bought it and I just don't want to start accumulating non-critical squawks again. Sent from my Pixel 9 Pro XL using Tapatalk -
Vibration dampening for PAR46 landing lights?
bcg replied to bcg's topic in Vintage Mooneys (pre-J models)
I'm sure a dynamic balance would make a difference, not discounting that at all. That said, for the sake of argument let's say I'm at .06 or so since I'm not feeling it, shouldn't a $200 PMAed landing light be able to handle that for more than a few months? Prop balance changes over time anyway so, even if I got it down to .01 in a year it might be .04+ again from prop wear. I'm thinking that if I can dampen the vibration at the lamp either instead of or in addition to reducing overall vibration, that it will help. I ordered one of these - https://skygeek.com/whelen-4006300-gasket.html. Hopefully it helps some, it definitely can't hurt. These - https://www.aeroresourcesinc.com/product_category/product_detail/61 - are supposed to reduce wind buffet and help as well, $115 for a piece of acrylic seems expensive though. If someone else has installed one and can confirm it makes a difference, it would be worth it to save the expense or replacing lamps, I don't want to be the guinea pig for that price though. -
Vibration dampening for PAR46 landing lights?
bcg replied to bcg's topic in Vintage Mooneys (pre-J models)
I had the prop IRANed 18 months or so ago. That includes disassembly, new seals, dressing the blades, paint and a static balance. I haven't done a dynamic balance, I'm sure it would help some. Since doing the motor mounts though I don't feel any vibration in the airplane. Sent from my Pixel 9 Pro XL using Tapatalk -
My C model eats landing lights, filament or LED style. I've had 2 AeroLED PAR46 lamps fail in the last 3 years, at $200 a pop, it gets expensive. I'm pretty sure it's vibration killing them, has anyone figured out a way to dampen that and get longer life out of them? I'm thinking about putting a rubber gasket between it and the back and another between it and the front retaining ring, I'm not sure it would help much thought. It's still going to have the aiming/set screws from the back side locking it into the cowl and there will be contact all the way around on the edge of the lamp so the gaskets aren't going to kill the vibration completely. I already replaced my engine mounts in December after installing a new light in November and I still had to replace that light this month so, while the mounts definitely made the airplane feel smoother, they didn't help the landing light. I don't fly at night so I don't actually *NEED* the light, it just bugs me to have it not working during the pre-flight and I like to turn it on when I'm on final to make myself more visible.
-
Minimum prereq's 1) Mooney training; 2) Mooney Insurance
bcg replied to qwerty1's topic in General Mooney Talk
I bought my C while I was a student with 20 hours total time in my logbook. Finished private in it and then did instrument, 3 years later I have a little over 450 hours in the C. Insurance was unobtainable as a student, as soon as I got my private it was no problem. I self-insured until I got my private, carried liability only for a year while I got instrument rated and then went to full coverage. Sent from my Pixel 9 Pro XL using Tapatalk -
I have a C in Kerrville if you're ever out this way. I may be at Hooks next week but, it'll be a quick turn if I do make the trip. Sent from my Pixel 9 Pro XL using Tapatalk
-
New Airplane to ME, and it was a Heck of a Delivery!
bcg replied to wood_fly's topic in General Mooney Talk
Congrats on the new airplane and welcome to the cult, I mean club. While it's not a 737 or a Gulfstream, they make great personal airliners. I can almost always be at commercial with my C, when you figure in security, boarding, deplaning, delays, baggage claim, etc. I haven't flown commercial since I bought her 3 years ago and I've made some pretty good trips. Starting from Kerrville, I've gone to Phoenix, Ruidoso, Durango, Atlanta, Oshkosh, West Palm Beach, Key West, Detroit, Nashville and Knoxville. Regularly use it for trips to Corpus Christi and Dallas. You're going to really enjoy having her ready to go when you are. Sent from my Pixel 9 Pro XL using Tapatalk -
What kind of clouds do you refuse to enter? Poll
bcg replied to 201er's topic in General Mooney Talk
For me, there are 2 kinds of clouds. Clouds and NOPE clouds. You know NOPE clouds when you see them and I stay far, far away from those and sometimes that means leaving the airplane in the hangar. -
It fit easily with the right seat out. Of course I had a W&B for no right seat installed. Sent from my Pixel 9 Pro XL using Tapatalk
-
It is, we put 5 in a commercial building a few years ago and have had 0 problems with them. I measured my door this morning, it's 34" tall x 24 wide at the bottom and 18 wide at the top so I should be able to fit it. Sent from my Pixel 9 Pro XL using Tapatalk
-
I'm actually considering pulling the right seat for this. I think it'll fit in the back seat but, having a big open area would probably make it easier to stow. The bowl is 30" deep x 15" high, I'm not sure about the width. I'm guessing that in the box, I'm probably looking at 36" x 21" x probably 24" or less. It's the 30" or 36" that I'm not sure will fit through the door.
-
It's an addition so we need to buy a new toilet anyway. Believe it or not, the full flush is almost $100 cheaper than the low flow version. We're getting the toilet that will flush a bucket of golf balls. Don't want to have to double-flush anything. Sent from my Pixel 9 Pro XL using Tapatalk
-
Anyone know offhand what the measurements are for the door on a short body? We can't buy good toilets in TX right now, only the ultra low flow so I bought one in Louisiana. I'm trying to figure out if I can fit it in the airplane or I'm going to have to drive (yuck). I thought Trump was going to let us have toilets that only took 1 flush again, I guess Gov Abbott didn't agree. Sent from my Pixel 9 Pro XL using Tapatalk
-
The new systems are required to be on at all times (hence both positions are ON) so the guarded switch isn't needed anymore. We measure loading in gallons and it's injecting into the exhaust for proper atomization and dispersal at low altitude. It allows a more targeted distribution, which certain agencies really prefer. I put mine in when I did my avionics upgrade and the grant money provided for installing it covered most of the labor for the entire upgrade. There are several different agency contracts going right now, though not as many as with the last administration. The "Mind Control" formula is paying the best at the moment and almost covers my fuel costs. I've had some ethical concerns about it but, avgas is expensive and you've got to save where you can. I can't really divulge too much about who is financing and providing the chemicals other than to say that it's likely who you would expect and a couple of others you may not have heard of before. They'll probably contact you since you've expressed interest, dealing with "They" has been easy, I haven't much enjoyed interactions with "Them" though so ask around the hangar before getting on board with a program to see what others think of it.
-
I've had my amp probe go squirrely a few times now. It gives me a "BAD PROBE" error and then starts doing this. Usually, the next flight it works just fine. Anyone have any ideas? It worked perfectly for a year or so and nothing changed recently that should have caused this.