Aaviationist

Classic can’t read jackk.

And there he is! “Can’t read Jackk”!. He will tell you all the reasons you’re wrong but can’t be bothered to read anything that doesn’t support his incorrect logic and alternative facts. you sir, are worse than my 5 year old nephew

It must be very frustrating when someone proves you wrong with facts, information, and regulations then you double down on your incorrect thinking rather than admit defeat. you can get a ppl with an iq below 80.

We’re having a hard time with parts here, I can’t imagine trying to get parts in Croatia. also, you might fit and it might be tight. I tried and did not fit. Not everyone is built the same. Ignore the comments about Al Mooney being 10’13 or whatever. He was also like, 150lbs.

There is a pilot around here with an IQ lower than 80, he’s a CFII and regularly flies single pilot IMC.

I think you’re both sub 80 iq

And just for good measure. that cage doesn’t do what you think it does.

You’re saying a Mooney “cage will support flying into the side of a mountain? it won’t.

No. The trick is to memorize the entire plate in about 15 seconds. Anyone with an IQ above 80 should be able to do this and if you can’t you shouldn’t be able to get your pilots license.

Seems pretty un-crushed to me

And be a CFI too many primo Donna’s.

I consider my iPad a part of my avionics.

We should get circle talk Mike in here too

I personally just memorize any plate I may possibly need. If you can’t do that you shouldn’t be flying. @Skates97how am I doing?

Relying on memory for something you looked at for a minute or two while flying an airplane is about the dumbest thing I think I’ve ever heard anyone suggest. Getting upset about someone using a reference is about the most unsafe and low IQ thing I think I’ve ever seen anyone do.

Imagine being so superiorly skilled and intelligent that you need to prove every major airline in the country is using portable devices incorrectly.

Imagine being so much smarter and better than everyone that there’s no chance you could lose an alternator, and you would “have someone’s ass” if you did. also imagine being able to completely memorize a plate and no longer needing a reference to it after briefing it. Just put it in the box and follow it blindly based on superior short term recollection. Surely such a highly skilled individual must have been studied by the FAA so we can rewrite all standards and regulations based on this superior knowledge of power generation and advanced memorization skills. id imagine such a person is surely smarter than all the engineers and scientists that spent the last 100 years developing these technologies and guidance around them.

I literally gave you a known example. https://www.faa.gov/ame_guide/app_process/general/decision Be careful, you and Mike talking together will start an infinite circle talk loop. “Circle talk Mike” and “too smart to read anything anyone else says Jack” together as one.

It’s like memento trying to talk to you. Seems like a disqualifying event you have going on here.

Because there isn’t any amount of proof, quoting regulation, or real life experience that will convince fools they are fools. there is no amount of circle talk, and re-asking the same question that changes the correct answer, only, once in a while the answer you wanted to hear, right or wrong, gets posted.

Or, you’re wrong.

Again, factually inaccurate. I wasn’t going to post this previously but it’s the best chance we have at getting you to stop spouting off nonsense. There is a fellow at my field with an ID and is below an 80iq. He has no medical restrictions and was able to get his medical without issue. He’s also good at studying and got a 100 on his written. At 20 hrs we solo-ed and at 59 hours he got his private pilot. He has excellent t stuck and rudder skills. 5 years later he has his CFI initial and I’d bet there isn’t anyone on the field that knows their stuff more than him.

It’s isn’t any more or less true than the last 5 times the question was answered after being asked.

There is a reason why a static rpm test exists. An engine not making full power will still make 2700rpm while moving (with a CS prop) and is not a good indicator of power.

You’re saying someone with less horsepower doesn’t see 2700rpm on takeoff?