cliffy

BINGO! The casual discussion of adding "charlie weight" to cure a too far fwd CG has more to consider than just fore/aft balance. Consider two airplanes -one with low polar moment longitudinally and another with high fore/aft polar moment BUT- both with the same vertical fin and rudder- The higher polar moment a/c will have less ability to recover from any yawing upset spin or no spin. One just can't add charlie weight if not provided for by the factory in testing. Other treads brought my attention to this subject.

My instructor had me doing spins way before my PP ride in a 150 I enjoyed them Back in the biplane days with no instruments, it was taught that if one was caught above a cloud deck and knew that there was room underneath that the way to get down was to go into a spin and hold it through the clouds. Once you broke out you got out of the spin. You always knew what condition you were in in a spin in IMC

My Commercial ticket check ride consisted of 2 turns about a point and 4 spins in my 1946 Cessna 140. I spun it many times I talked with Bill Wheat once and he related that he got into a 5 turn spin in a Mooney and didn't think he was going to get out of it. Said he'd never do it again. Polar moments play a big roll in spin recovery after rotation is established (IMO). "They all fly through the same air" as Al Mooney said but a lot of things play into the dynamics of aircraft control

In those airframes with "charlie weights" in the aft of the fuselage I wonder what Mooney found as far as how it affected the fore/aft polar moments in spin recovery? I've never heard it discussed Adding extra weight there "might" have deleterious affect on spin entry/recovery

The only reason they had an AD on gear actuator was because no one took them apart, cleaned them out and refilled with the correct lube in 30 years or more. If that had been done you wouldn't have the AD. If they had been treated correctly I doubt many would have ever worn out.

Converted -- IIRC, only 3 Ds still survive unconverted CG has a big affect on TAS in Mooneys Mine is way fwd due to me :-) With 80 lbs in the baggage I gain +6 mph with a 3 blade up front But I'm satisfied as it is. I've been known to go clear across the country at 1500 AGL!! Just enjoying the ride. It flies hands off very well without an A/P

27 years in the same D model at @ 90 hrs / yr Does everything I need in a traveling chariot. Coast to coast - north to south- Calif to FL- Texas to WI 155 smph (TAS) at 9.5 g/hr year after year. 1,000 hrs on my own garage overhaul and purrs like a kitten. Never had a speck of metal in the filter-NEVER and- NO oil leaks anywhere. Can't beat it.

YUP Looks like a well cooked pizza

Do you intend to ream the hole to make it perfectly round for a new bushing? Is there any max oversize limit allowed for that part ?

Lots to do and lots cheaper before you make a costly decision- First, was the compression test done using a "Master Orifice'" compression tester as per Continental procedures? If not find a mechanic that knows what he is doing in that regard Secondly- follow Continental's procedures for tracking down compression leaks IF the cylinders are in fact low on compression Any good A&P can tell you where the leakage is coming from. IF its valve leakage do a "lap in place" procedure to try an fix the leakage without pulling cylinders. It does work many times. Just make sure you have them replace (with new) the valve rotators when they lap the valves. Oil burning and ring compression leakage indicates time to try the ring flush procedure that Mike Bush promotes. Quite probably oil control rings seized That too does work often enough to make the try worthwhile. What is Continental's max allowed oil consumption per hour? Are you below that? If so, not to worry- just fly it and put oil in. Just as a point of reference on my 4 cylinder Lycoming the max oil use allowed is near 3/4 qt per hour. If in fact the cylinders need work you might consider having your own first run cylinders overhauled BY A GOOD SHOP rather than waiting a year or more for new ones. Just follow Continental's book on reassembly using the proper specified tools. First run overhauls are usually a pretty good way to go in that you know what your cylinders have gone through. With a factory reman engine you have no idea how many hours are on the cylinders. Cylinder rework USED to be common place but for some reason now a days many shy away from such work. BTW, all A&Ps were taught how to overhaul cylinders in school! Reworking the overheads (valves and guides) was actually a shop bench job if the cylinder itself was within wear limits. Their is nothing dangerous about cylinder work if proper procedures are followed. You need more and correct information before you decide its time to spend lots of money. You might consider signing up with Mike Bush for his help service. I have no connection with him but I have spoken to him several times at seminars. Cam problems would be low on my worry list.

Having been around this flying business for over 60 years it always amazes me when I look around at any airport and see what is parked there. You will see pristine examples of what is "aviation art" and you will see derelicts rotting away. What I can't figure is someone who owns an "investment" of $80,000 on the LOW side upwards of a quarter million dollars and letting that asset just sit there a rot away. Would that same person buy a new car for $100,000 and just park it on the street and drive it an hour a month for years? Letting it rot away the same way? What is it about airplanes and aviation that brings one to that frame of mind? Secondly, we now have a great portion of GA airplanes ( not counting experimental or LS) that are approaching easily 50 years old and many expect them to perform as trouble free as a new car. These are antiques to say the least. How many airplane owners are driving 50 year old cars? And yet we expect our 50 year old airplanes to operate on less maintenance than our new cars. Always looking for the quickie cheapest annual and never actually fixing EVERYTHING that fails to work correctly. And at the same time we launch off into the sky- NIGHT OR DAY- CLEAR SKIES OR CLOUDS with nary a thought to the consequences It boggles the mind. Every day the "fleet" gets smaller as we fiddle while Rome burns.

Just take a volt meter and trace backwards from the SOS to see where the electricity stops This is not rocket science. Its only one wire. Is there 12 v power getting to the SOS? If not- Go to the other end of that wire - Is there12 v power getting to the other end of THAT wire? If not- if not continue as above and find where the power stops Basic trouble shooting will save a lot of time and money instead of a parts cannon.

Cybertruck= depreciating asset But maybe cool for a while in some circles I have a friend with an electric Hummer! Mooney= holds its own or increases in value BUT not this Mooney. Sorry but lots better examples for sale My first impression was - Run - don't walk- away from it.

Is your plan to sign this off as an OPP part? Might call the factory and see if they have oversize bushings available. They might also be able to provide the material specs. Is the gear leg outer steel hole oversize or just the bolt hole?