Jump to content

Walt

Basic Member
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Model
    M18

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Walt's Achievements

Rookie

Rookie (2/14)

  • One Year In
  • First Post
  • One Month Later
  • Week One Done

Recent Badges

1

Reputation

  1. Kevin, In one of your messages you mentioned, " The wing construction information indicates "Birch plywood similar to S.T.C. SA2-1053 (Mooney M-18 N-383A) by Frank Poplawski, Route 3, Ennis Texas". " Is it possible to trouble you a copy of this as well? I am looking for a copy of this statement and where it is located for the chain to be able to show it is the same as in the E&I. The FAA can be sticklers on this type of thing. The actual STC I am trying to get from the FAA. I got all eleven of E&I. Thanks Again, Walt
  2. Kevin, I enjoy your Mite posts. I am rebuilding #231 and have a 90hp RR engine for it and want to increase the Gross Weight (for reasons best left at the dinner table). I have a copy of Al Mooney's original design specs for the M19 and it clearly specifies a fully wood covered wing and higher GW increase than C-GXTR has. I do not want to put 231 in the experimental class (I have a copy of a 337 for the engine from the FAA). Most of the other changes you described in your Sept 25, 2020, post have already been made in accordance with Mooney Service Bulletins and FAA AD's. What I would like to know is do you have copies of the original specs authorized by Canadian DOT and the authorization for the full wood covered wing. It may help with the FAA based on reciprocity. I have also consulted with a DER who is favorable to the change. However, the A&P feels that the FAA will want more. Thank you Walt Ayers
  3. I am interested in a set as well for an M20C
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.