Jump to content

jager3

Supporter
  • Posts

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by jager3

  1. Thank you for the replies, information, and advice. Also, I wasn't sure the aerocruze 100 was approved for the M20C; it looks like a much more practical way to go for the money.
  2. I own an M20C that was never equipped with an autopilot. I would appreciate information on installing an old (approved) Brittain autopilot as my first. I would like information as follows: 1) equipment list, ie. servos, control head, etc. 2) additional flight system, ie. gyros, sensors, etc. 3 )obtaining certification by FAA 4) instillation tips and user operation instructions I realize this is an old system, but I know it has already had approval and Tru-Trak and others are either not fully approved or have priced themselves our of my range. I've hand flown my aircraft for over 3 decades and realize the latest "whiz bang" unit would be idea, but after experiencing my 2nd major overhaul, I am woefully short of pocket change to buy the "latest".
  3. I know of quite a few "private" pilots with very "deep pockets" that have flown high performance aircraft that far exceed Mooney's specifications, ie. speed, weight, etc. Just because it is allowed does not make it safe or practical. The ones I am familiar with can afford the "ride" and smart enough to obtain the applicable license to operate the aircraft (and can afford the "gosh awful" insurance cost), but are woefully deficient in flight experience! While I don't relish sharing the same airspace with a sport pilot in a "complex aircraft", I share the road with a closing speed of over 130 mph with 16 year olds who (many) can barely walk and chew gum at the same time (much less "text" while driving!). I also know, and have known, of inexperienced aviators starting out in complex aircraft and most realize the vast amount of knowledge they do not posses, but must learn. (That experience is a rude awakening when any emergency arises compounded by weather and speed!) Long story short: I'm all for obtaining more pilots into our community. Most restrictions placed on applicants trying to enter our "world" have been based on incidents and accidents resulting in more regulations and expense, we will eventually "price" ourselves out of the "game" without restructuring regulations. Restricting sport pilot to two "occupants" or limiting speed is not so restrictive as to curtail participation. Requiring a person to become familiar with the aircraft and "equipment", or becoming more proficient in "type" is not too restrictive either. Most Serious aviators move up in ratings to expand their knowledge and abilities when pursuing a career, those pursuing a hobby just want to experience "flight". In my experience flying as a hobby is short lived unless it leads to more serious pursuits. I'm glad and surprised to see an effort to expand our community by our federal government, for it is a positive sign in my opinion, which may lead us back to a more favorable societal view of aviation as a "pass time". I claim no superior point of view; my very first aircraft was lent to me by the government. As a 22 yr. old flying a T-34C with a 225 HP engine - I had all of 8 hr. when I solo'd. Regulations should not inhibit the motivation to fly, but promote the quest to learn. Mooney did, at one time, make a model with fixed gear (M20D?) as a "training" aircraft. This training model was short lived, either due to cost or other factors. Although the fixed gear model could be converted by the factory, Mooney marketed their retractable geared aircraft as a "fast traveler" to complete with other retractable geared aircraft - the fixed gear model did not fit this "mold". We are reminded of expensive flying has become each time we taxi up to a fuel pump, or receive a bill for our last annual - the EAA is finally exploring ways to make flying cheaper. We fly one of the most efficient aircraft in the market, why not share this secret with rest of the community! My .02
  4. 201 - I haven't heard from Notar, so yes I'm am interested. I'd appreciate the pictures you offered, price, and if you have a proper length cable to go with it. It will be installed on a 64 M20C. (I'm assuming my "C" model has the same markings as your J.) Thanks for "jumping in". jager3
  5. Do you still have this listed tachometer on hand? Do you also have an RFI cable available? Thanks.
  6. Skates - I was able to download the file from your post! Many thanks!
  7. piperpainter - I would be in your debt if you were still able (knowing this is an old post!) send instructions on modifying my M20C's rear seats so they can be folded. My eMail is: kmjohn@sbcglobal.net. Thank you very much, Ken J.
  8. Please send plans to modify an M20C back seat to a folding configuration. Thank you. Ken
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.