I for one am excited to try G100UL. Having read all that I can find on it, and watching about every George Braly video on youtube, I actually believe what's he's saying. I am an engineer, and like others here am naturally skeptical about any new shiny object. But, I'm also able to follow the science, and truly believe that a crankcase and oil will be MUCH cleaner without burning TEL. Thus I believe that oil changes and overhauls will become less frequent.
And let it be known I generally don't trust 3 letter govt agencies, but the fact that two FAA field offices approved G100UL after each of them went through ALL of the testing criteria, I'll admit to being impressed. And I'm also impressed with the amount of testing that GAMI has done for over a decade, and nobody disputes that they have the best aviation fuel testing rig known to man. I'm impressed that the fuel that has been stored for years works perfectly. I'm impressed with the fungibility of the product, and the materials testing.
I'm not concerned with the lack of "standards", knowing how such standards work. I've been involved in standards work with software many times over my career. You can't miss the hatred of GAMI that oozes out of almost everything that PAFI and EAGLE put out in their press releases.
I expect that only FBOs in CA and those that operate at fields where there is another provider of fuel will be willing to provide G100UL until they are forced by the all powerful Federal Govt to stop selling 100LL, but when an FBO within a reasonable distance sells G100UL, I'll go out of my way to support them. I understand that G100UL will cost more, but it wouldn't surprise me if the price doesn't drop dramatically when there are multiple producers, distributors, and sellers of the fuel. That's just how competition and free markets are supposed to work.
I guess all of this makes me a fan boy.
Ute