Thanks for the replies, all! I think the end of this opening discussion will probably answer the M20S discussion...I'd love to saddle one up but we're probably looking pre-J so I can enjoy flying (more importantly, keeping it flying) AND staying married!
Funny the wife was mentioned, we'll just call that one marked off of the checklist. She has shared almost all of my time in a Bonanza, some of the 172, has C-310 ride along time I don't even have and....drumroll - she and my daughter are the only members of my household that actually has flown in a Mooney. How's that for backwards? Close friend and member here M016576 took them on an airport run when we were back in Oregon. Unfortunately for her, he has a Missile with more glass than my day job (literally) so she'll have to tune it down a notch.
Budget -- under $65K-$70k. I had planned on (and may still end up there, I've no aversion) a vintage M20, leaning towards an E or F and a bit lower budget. But, things change, so I've opened up the search slightly. This is an example of what's on the scope http://www.mooneypilots.com/sales/Jones.html but mostly vintage models so I have the recommended 10AMU from the start, maybe even plus some.
90% mission -- This has taken the most time to settle, still not convinced this is final, but hey, it's 90%, right?
- Needs: The wife and I and the dog for the overwhelming majority. Maybe room for growth for a tiny human. I have two daughters, but they are older and the youngest about to move off to college. Panel config: this may be odd in a need, and I can probably move this to "want" once I'm smart enough on reconfiguration cost and feasibility, but multiple conversations with peers have come to discussing negative transfer from years of instrument flying for work. I either need a standard configuration instrument layout, or stay VMC until it's fixed.
- Wants: Efficiency and range, and who doesn't want speed? Hence, the Mooney and Comanche on the draft board. Love the Bo minus the tail wag, not keen on their (relative) operating expense. Comanche makes me a little nervous in this regard as far as parts/availability. My traveling career isn't over, so it's very difficult to tag a "standard trip range." Right now, fairly short and flat terrain. Next year? Should be back in Oregon - longer trips and certainly different conditions. 5-10 years? Combination of both or could be firmly back into easy terrain and thunderstorm avoidance in the summertime. Why the long body? If the companion list grows on certain trips, it wouldn't bother me to rent - but I'd like to keep that to a minimum and still be able to convince adults to ride along and get into the back seat.
I don't feel strongly about manual vs electric gear, but I do like the idea of the simpler solution. Everything else is the great unknown, and every time I think I've read it all - I find something new. 180 or 200 HP? Long or short body? Manual or electric? (Insert dozens/hundreds of "little things" here as well; window shape/size, nuances within different years of the same model, etc.) So, still reading!
Cheers