Aaviationist

its important to follow these steps upon learning you have a bad electric pump on the ground - Step one remove key from switch step 2 remove all occupants step 3 walk to car step 4 drive wherever it was your going

That’s not what irony is….

Your problem is in your response.

Circle talk Mike strikes again.

I would try to explain it to you but I’m sure you wouldn’t get it so I won’t. for the others, attempt is still a crime. if someone plans to rob a bank, they have a plan and start acting on that plan, but get pulled over on the way holding a gun, that’s still attempted robbery. The fact that you got caught before completing the act does NOT make the attempted act go away. googling and trying to come up with AI responses don’t usually help in these things.

I noticed the people that liked your post are people who have personally attacked me both here and other threads. kettle? mooneyspace has a reputation for being unfriendly. In fact, my very first post here when I was initially interested in a Mooney and I didn’t fit comfortably, someone told me it was because I was fat and needed to lose weight (I’m north of 240 and it’s most definitely NOT fat) nah. people leave because know noting circle talk.

it’s the case that he bought swamp land? They aren’t the same product. One is an agreement allowing you to use a fuel, which nobody has prevented, and the other is the fuel itself - which it’s suggested he never used. ask ANY attorney. It’s really that simple.

Even if that was the case, the equivalent here would be a permit to buy the land. If you bought the fuel and then wanted a refund for the fuel or to sue for the fuel you bought, that’s would be the equivalent. Not the STC.

Yes. That same logic applies here. If you buy land that turns out to be a swamp, that’s on you for not doing the research to make sure the land is suitable for you needs. Again, it’s really very basic. if you don’t think you got what you paid for, dispute the charge with the bank. It’s not a legal issue.

Also, I saw your airplane recently. It’s exactly the cheap maintenance nightmare I expected it to be. just as an FYI.

I get it perfectly. as usual, you do not. I don’t know if your problems are some sort of mental deficiency or just a general reduction in capacity due to age. In order for there to be a lawsuit there needs to be damages. In this case, the stated damages were for a product that didn’t do what was advertised. In this case the product was an STC to allow the use of a specific fuel. unless the other poster has been blocked or prevented from using the fuel, there are no damages. He/she got exactly what they paid for. it’s REALLY not that complicated for most, but for you, I’m sure it is.

No, you paid 400$ for an STC allowing you to use the fuel covered under the STC. are you saying Gami or someone prevented you from using the fuel? how much of the STC’d fuel have you run through your engine?

Needs to be replaced in my opinion.

What exactly are your damages?

Your agenda isn’t everyone else’s agenda. don’t do that.