-
Posts
12 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Media Demo
Events
Posts posted by n961jk
-
-
There are many current panel options that are less expensive. A retrofit Garmin can be had for 40K. all glass and no vacuum. Why not install these at the factory as an option?
- 1
-
Why do they need 600k panels? There are many current panel options that are less expensive. A retrofit Garmin can be had for 40K. all glass and no vacuum. Why not install these at the factory as an option?
- 1
-
Why do they need 600k panels?
- 3
-
Don Maxwell has a you tube video on hot starts. Works every time even after a 5 our flight. Shut it down, restart in 45 seconds.
- 1
-
Interested. Have a 76F. let me know what you decide?
-
Are these still available
-
On 12/9/2018 at 10:40 AM, KLRDMD said:
How well does an F model take off and land in 650 ft at gross weight ? A Mooney and a 182 are different airplanes for different missions.
Does that 650 ft runway have trees at both ends? Then the 182 wont make it out of that field at gross weight. Positive you wouldn't land it at gross weight in that distance either with the obstacles. Ground Roll: 620 ft Over 50 ft obstacle: 1020 ft for a 230HP 182. So these numbers are impressive and the 182 is a good plane. Mooney's are just better.
-
On 12/7/2018 at 3:10 PM, steingar said:
The Skylane is I think the best overall GA airplane ever made by anyone. It is the only one I've ever heard of that will fly with the seats and the tanks full. It'll happily land and blast out of short fields, but still moves at near Mooney speeds. Not for me, I like my Mooney. But they are impressive aircraft, and I've nothing bad to say about them.
My 76F will fly with 4 average size adults and full tanks @ Mooney speeds and Mooney fuel burns of 9 to 10 gallon hr. For 6 hours. Unfortunately when I am flying i count for 1.5 adults.
-
On 12/5/2018 at 11:05 AM, Browncbr1 said:
you'll get to learn how much more you appreciate your Mooney! You'll get to see how a 210 handles. I got mine in a 182. It climbs better, flies slower, burns more fuel, and lands like a pig.
A 182 flies like a bag of hammers
- 2
-
On 11/5/2018 at 4:27 PM, bill98 said:
has anyone used the Ram Suction mount ones?
https://www.rammount.com/blog/2015/04/ram-mounts-new-sun-visor/
I give the ram mount 0 stars.
- 1
-
On 11/5/2018 at 4:27 PM, bill98 said:
has anyone used the Ram Suction mount ones?
https://www.rammount.com/blog/2015/04/ram-mounts-new-sun-visor/
I bought this for my 76F and it was useless
Odd approach clearance...am I an idiot or did ATC screw up?
in Mooney Safety & Accident Discussion
Posted
That was truly an amazing article. I have saved this in my notebook for future use.