n961jk

That was truly an amazing article. I have saved this in my notebook for future use.

There are many current panel options that are less expensive. A retrofit Garmin can be had for 40K. all glass and no vacuum. Why not install these at the factory as an option?

Why do they need 600k panels? There are many current panel options that are less expensive. A retrofit Garmin can be had for 40K. all glass and no vacuum. Why not install these at the factory as an option?

Why do they need 600k panels?

Don Maxwell has a you tube video on hot starts. Works every time even after a 5 our flight. Shut it down, restart in 45 seconds.

Interested. Have a 76F. let me know what you decide?

Are these still available

Does that 650 ft runway have trees at both ends? Then the 182 wont make it out of that field at gross weight. Positive you wouldn't land it at gross weight in that distance either with the obstacles. Ground Roll: 620 ft Over 50 ft obstacle: 1020 ft for a 230HP 182. So these numbers are impressive and the 182 is a good plane. Mooney's are just better.

My 76F will fly with 4 average size adults and full tanks @ Mooney speeds and Mooney fuel burns of 9 to 10 gallon hr. For 6 hours. Unfortunately when I am flying i count for 1.5 adults.

A 182 flies like a bag of hammers

I give the ram mount 0 stars.

I bought this for my 76F and it was useless