Jump to content

GOJAC

Basic Member
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

GOJAC's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • First Post

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. I believe the concern about damaging an engine by operating LOP dates back to the days of the airliners with large radial engines and flight engineers. In order to obtain maximum advantage from operating LOP on these engines it is necessary to advance the ignition timing to about 40degrees BTDC. This produces a significant reduction in specific fuel consumption and extended the range of the old airliners. The timing was controlled by an extra lever in the care of the flight engineer. The procedure was to set up the desired RPM and MAP, weaken the mixture to LOP and then advance the ignition to restore power without additional fuel consumption. The risk to the engine arose from the consequence of inadvertently enriching the mixture without first retarding the ignition to about 20 - 25 degrees BTDC. Detonation would almost certainly occur and the engine would be seriously damaged. Current GA aircraft do not usually carry flight engineers and are therefore not permitted to have a means of advancing ignition timing to 40 degrees BTDC and we are prevented from damaging our engines by its misuse. What we need is an electronic ignition system that will monitor RPM, MAP, air flow and fuel flow and calculate the optimum ignition advance and implement the advance with no pilot intervention. This would give us a real fuel saving with a small loss of speed, if the authorities would approve it. Roger
  2. I have had a similar problem with my M20J. I was achieving a cruise speed of about 145kts TAS at 2,000ft with 75% power set. I asked my A&P to take off the rocker covers and check the valve lift. Two of the inlet valves had a lift of only about one third of the others due to cam wear. The engine had less than 400 hours but was overhauled 11 years ago. I had a similar problem in 2010 twelve years after an overhaul. The aircraft has always been hangared, but this does not seem to stop corrosion of the camshaft. The engine has now been overhauled and fitted with a new camshaft and I am achieving 160kts at 75% power. It may also be worth checking the RPM indicator. Mine has a 150RPM error. Replacements do not seem to be available so I have fitted an EDM830 with RPM and MAP. Roger
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.