Aaron,
In reading your post, I am still shocked as to what you were trying to receive by sharing this information. I am sure you feel important to be privy to information after a crash, and feel as though sharing your gossip with others is entertaining, however you need to be careful stating such information when an investigation has not been completed. I know you were not onboard that aircraft during that flight. You don't know exactly what happened. You haven't talked to the pilot. I think it is only fair to the pilot and the passengers to not share such information. If your intent is to create something for others to "learn" by, well, that is hard to do if you don't know what actually took place.
You said: "Im guessing he got dissorianted, as looking across the cock pit to look at the instruments and looking up for lights can really screw a person up." Well, he may have been disoriented...but you aren't him, and you weren't there, so why would you jump to that conclusion?
Wouldn't it be interesting if your airplane was at fault? Would that change what information you would post?
Also, for an instrument rated Private Pilot like you to judge the decision making abilities of a CFI, CFII, and former airline pilot is interesting to me. Sounds like he did nothing wrong with his decision making to me. He chose to shoot an approach after a Citation just landed...sounds legit to me, I would do it. He had the gas, and an alternate in mind...why not shoot the approach? Clearly you haven't flown for an airline where you are required to shoot an approach as long as it is legal...and in this case, it was. Now, we may never know why he didn't make it to the runway. Yes, it may have been an error or omission, but it may have been something else. But, I think we can all agree that jumping to conclusions before a formal investigation is complete is not fair to the pilot. What if that had been you?