Jump to content

Which battery?


Recommended Posts

Changed to the Concorde sealed battery in the second year of ownership of C-FSWR. Never had a reason to look back. Great battery compared to the Gill (went through three before changing). The current one is in its fifth year on the aircraft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well..........I bought a G-35 in 2007 when bought the C Model, and it died this past spring, however, every year like clock work and I even pull the battery once between annuals to clean the battery box. I have had good luck with the Gill in everyway except puking acid out all in the box that they seem to do so regularly. I will try a Concorde next go round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had my Concorde for 2 years now and it's still going strong. Parked outside all winter, never used a charger and never had any problem starting even in below zero wheather around Montréal, QC. BTW, I also made the change to a PlanePower alternator and a Skytec starter, a good move!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 years later...
If I'm counting correctly, four different posters have mentioned the Concorde RG-35RXC.  Zero references to this number on the Concorde web site.  Is it the RG-35AXC?  Four identical typos?


Yep. Should be the AXC. My first one lasted 13 years. Didn’t die but succumbed to an over torque at an avionics shop.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Marauder said:

 

 


Yep. Should be the AXC. My first one lasted 13 years. Didn’t die but succumbed to an over torque at an avionics shop.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

 

One can hope.  mine came with the plane and IIRC was installed about 8 years ago, so I'm hoping I've got 5 years left.  I know it's got plenty of capacity left given how much cranking I had to do with a bad mag last year...

I have a cheapo battery charger I got from Wal-Mart, but I never use it--I just try to fly at least every one or two weeks.  As long as the charger is reasonable quality and handles AGM batteries, you should be ok, but a lot of people go for the "official" Battery Minder charger for aviation if they want a charger they can leave on for weeks at a time...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fly Boomer said:

That's nothing short of amazing in the world of airplanes.  I was also shopping for a maintainer.  Any suggestions?  Also, any suggestions for a good price on the RG-35AXC?

In order to provide you with our experience regarding maintainers, we are going to have to know where you live (or which airport you call home for your plane).  Not wishing to pry, but I am not certain you will want to fly six hours to get to your maintenance shop.

Just sayin'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fly Boomer said:

That's nothing short of amazing in the world of airplanes.  I was also shopping for a maintainer.  Any suggestions?  Also, any suggestions for a good price on the RG-35AXC?

I’ll sell you an RG35AXC for $1,000.00 plus shipping, it would be a really good price for me!

Clarence

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fly Boomer said:

Guess I should have defined "good" a little better.  I did see one on eBay for a little over $700 (plus shipping).  Everyone knows that eBay prices are always "good", right?

??  It's $319 at Aircraft Spruce

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I talked to a vendor of certified Li-ion aircraft batteries at AirVenture last week.  That company is building batteries with what I call a true battery management system  monitoring each cell, with under and over voltage protection, thermal management and full current limiting.  

I was looking for an upgrade to the RG46 battery.  It’s not available yet.   If and when it comes out the battery life should be thousands of cycles, not hundreds as with our lead acid batteries.  The battery weighs less and has more capacity in the same volume.  

Only big negative is the price.  Think multiple AMU for a RG35 style replacement.  

For a turboprop where every % rpm faster cranking means cooler starting it is worthwhile.  Their Cessna Caravan Li-ion Battery replacement is around $15,000.  

For a piston the 19th century lead acid battery is still the economical choice.  

Lacking any real alternative I just bought two new Concorde lead acid bricks this summer.  I have them connected to so-called smart chargers when in the hangar.  The last pair survived 4 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A quick search reveals:

Spruce              319.00    including shipping
Chief               318.00    including shipping
Sky Geek            351.25
Univair             317.75
BatteryOut          319.95
Aircraft Supply     349.80
Wag-Aero            316.20
145.aero            328.49    including shipping

 

There are a few outliers but, in general, the open market is at work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jerry 5TJ said:

I talked to a vendor of certified Li-ion aircraft batteries at AirVenture last week.  That company is building batteries with what I call a true battery management system  monitoring each cell, with under and over voltage protection, thermal management and full current limiting.  

I was looking for an upgrade to the RG46 battery.  It’s not available yet.   If and when it comes out the battery life should be thousands of cycles, not hundreds as with our lead acid batteries.  The battery weighs less and has more capacity in the same volume.  

Only big negative is the price.  Think multiple AMU for a RG35 style replacement.  

For a turboprop where every % rpm faster cranking means cooler starting it is worthwhile.  Their Cessna Caravan Li-ion Battery replacement is around $15,000.  

For a piston the 19th century lead acid battery is still the economical choice.  

Lacking any real alternative I just bought two new Concorde lead acid bricks this summer.  I have them connected to so-called smart chargers when in the hangar.  The last pair survived 4 years. 

My first Concorde RG35AXE lasted 6-1/2 years; I'm two years into it's replacement. I do not own and have never used a "smart charger," only the dumb walmart one when I let it get low a time or two . . . . Sure beats a new wet cell every 2 years or less, and little danger to the stupidly-expensive battery box hanging on my firewall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Fly Boomer said:

Also, it appears that the Concorde RG-35A XC likes the BatteryMINDer 128CEC1-AA-S5.

I can order it with my Aircraft Spruce discount if you want.  Not much of a discount on the battery but a little more on the Battery Minder. Free shipping.

1922834603_ScreenShot2018-08-01at9_38_38PM.thumb.png.eb0b03f0daaf514e97797a4732c19dca.png

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As DOM of a corporate flight department, I purchase quite a few Concorde batteries. I see a lot of love for them here, and I want to set the record straight, they are good, but not great. 

The first thing is that any lead acid battery degrades. Concorde batteries are no exception. When new, they more than meet their AH rating. A 44AH battery will test at over 50++AH on either the 10 or 20 hour test. However, as time passes, they lose capacity and eventually at the 3 year mark, (here in Florida) they won't pass a properly performed capacity check, not even close. Recently replaced a pair of 3 year Concorde old batts in our Pilatus PC12/47, #1 tested at 30%, #2 at 60%, starting performance was still excellent. Since lead acid batteries tend to last longer in cooler weather, it's possible that a cooler location may allow it to pass a 3 year cap check to 80% or about 35AH. That's a good bit off the 52AH (real world) new capacity though (remember the 44AH rating? ) . I strongly suspect that those of you using very old Concorde batteries are using batteries that are far from rated capacity, not to mention new capacity. 

I spoke with Concorde and they admit the maximum life is 4 years in ideal conditions. That means passing the 3 year cap check might be possible and failing the 4th year. But remember that the way Concorde does it is by "sandbagging" the specs. The degradation still happens on schedule. 

The capacity is required to run avionics and put the gear down after the charging system fails. The capacity has little to do with starting.  

 

Edit: Also, I get 2 years from the single Concorde's in hard use. At which point, they are toast and starting suffers. 

 

 

Edited by cujet
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.