Jump to content

Is this true or a rumor?


Glen Davis

Recommended Posts

My friend had the nose wheel tire on his K model go flat this evening upon landing. Fortunately he was able to make it off the runway so the airport did not have to be closed down. I asked him if it caused a prop strike. He said no and that is because (and here is my question) to be certified a plane has to have 9 inches of proper clearance even if the nose wheel is flat and the strut is completely compressed”. Well I actually did not measure it but I don’t think I have 9 inches of prop clearance in my J model even when everything is in perfect condition. Any truth to this certification requirement? And as a follow-up question, what type of suspension system does the nose wheel on a J model or a K model have? Is it a piston or rubber donuts or some thing else?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, PT20J said:

Here’s the reference in CAR 3

So out of curiosity...  Is the 9" clearance on a tail wheel aircraft while the tail wheel is touching the ground?  (e.g. parked or slow taxi)  Or while in the takeoff roll when the tail is elevated.  And if it is 9" when the TW is down, does it then have a 7" clearance on the takeoff roll?  (Some day I gotta get around to that endorsement...)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, PeteMc said:

So out of curiosity...  Is the 9" clearance on a tail wheel aircraft while the tail wheel is touching the ground?  (e.g. parked or slow taxi)  Or while in the takeoff roll when the tail is elevated.  And if it is 9" when the TW is down, does it then have a 7" clearance on the takeoff roll?  (Some day I gotta get around to that endorsement...)

 

Level takeoff or taxi, whichever is most critical. I don’t believe 7 inches plays into anything on a conventional gear airplane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, PeteMc said:

So out of curiosity...  Is the 9" clearance on a tail wheel aircraft while the tail wheel is touching the ground?  (e.g. parked or slow taxi)  Or while in the takeoff roll when the tail is elevated.  And if it is 9" when the TW is down, does it then have a 7" clearance on the takeoff roll?  (Some day I gotta get around to that endorsement...)

 

Just read it again…slowly :)

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glenn,

The nose gear is tall enough to protect the engine from a prop strike under most conditions….

For all Mooneys…

But, with a missing tire… the blades will be closer to the ground than usual….

 

Where Mooneys have had prop strikes…. Holes in the ground.  Pot holes in the pavement, or washed out soil taxiing off the pavement….

The hole required to cause a prop strike just got a few inches smaller, as the tire deflates….

MS experiences only, not mine…

Best regards,

 -a-

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Fly Boomer said:

I read 7 inches with air in the tire and "positive clearance" when flat.

And the critical gear (nose wheel here of course) fully compressed

But we have all heard or seen prop strikes on level hard surface runways, without flats, so it can be done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, carusoam said:

Hard to find on any MSer planes…

Many reasons to remove…

No reasons to keep…

All documented around here somewhere…

Best regards,

-a-

What would be the reasons to remove ? 
apart from a few lbs saving 

I still have it installed 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, OR75 said:

What would be the reasons to remove ? 
apart from a few lbs saving 

I still have it installed 

There are times when I’d like to have one, specifically sometimes I get into bumps that get the nose pogoing up and down, not dangerous, but annoying. Slow down quickly and it stops, I’m talking walking speed not fast taxi.

A shock would dampen this resonant movement

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/26/2022 at 1:58 PM, OR75 said:

Anyone still have the shock absorber on the nose wheel ?

It was my understanding that "shock absorber" is actually a shimmy damper.  If you look at the picture the rubber disks are still there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, OR75 said:

What would be the reasons to remove ? 
apart from a few lbs saving 

I still have it installed 


This thing is technically the shimmy damper….

A bolt on device for a problem we don’t have…

Proper set-up of the nose gear keeps the shimmy out…

If it doesn’t, there are wear items that get replaced…

Taking the parts off is a maintenance procedure…

The savings… must be a whole LB UL.   :)

The device is soooo old.  It probably doesn’t provide any shimmy absorption… like a 50 year old shock absorber…

PP thoughts only…

-a-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OR75 said:

maybe remove it and see if there is  a difference . put it back if if i don't like how it feels 

I did that first part with a spouse once who refused to fly with me....there was a difference, in a good way

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.