Jump to content

Mooney elevators, Mine at rest are up a few degrees, 1966 E, saw a 1969 E yesterday on the ramp, at rest elevator is down...


asaxet

Recommended Posts

In my 64 C model, there are a set of bungee springs which mix stab trim position into the elevator pushrods in the tailcone. I always park with trim fully nose down to unload these springs, but the elevator still rests on them.

I think the later year models don't have this spring, and trim only effects the stab position?

Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, N201MKTurbo said:

It depends where you have the trim set when you shut down.

The trim wheel moves the horizontal stabilizer, the elevator itself should be pretty flat. Full up trim will make it look like Down Elevator, but it isn't. I often land with trim near the Takeoff mark, and find my tail is generally pretty flat. Like this.

77472_1384165025.thumb.jpg.b26849d7614347153da1b40d6b77e25b.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, N201MKTurbo said:

It depends where you have the trim set when you shut down.

This is correct. On all the models up through the J (The K and later have a bob weight and down spring) there are "trim assist bungees" that move the elevator as the trim changes the angle of incidence of the horizontal stabilizer. The elevator should be pretty much in trail with the trim in takeoff position on the ground, but there is some friction in the elevator system and if you move the elevator by its trailing edge, it will stay a bit up or down depending on where you release it.

Skip

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hank said:

The trim wheel moves the horizontal stabilizer, the elevator itself should be pretty flat. Full up trim will make it look like Down Elevator, but it isn't. I often land with trim near the Takeoff mark, and find my tail is generally pretty flat. Like this.

77472_1384165025.thumb.jpg.b26849d7614347153da1b40d6b77e25b.jpg

A short body with that much up stabilizer trim should have the elevators much further up….with leading edge of stabilizer 3.5 degrees down, the elevators should be 10 degrees up, per the TCDS….(19 degrees if it is a converted D model) The plane in the photo looks to have the stabilizer at at least 2/3 up trim. His elevators look low to me- a bungee adjustment will fix it. This plane probably will not trim at 75-80 mph hands off with full flaps, as it should.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, carusoam said:

Fancy….

More trim comes with more apparent camber….

That Al Mooney guy must have been brilliant!

:)

 

Why did the Long Bodies do away with the springs…. The elevator hangs from its hinges with the yoke pressed against the instrument panel…

Best regards,

-a-

It took me a long time (and a lot of emails back and forth with Ron Blum) before I understood the bungees. There are lot’s of ways to build a trim system. The most common is the trim tab. Another way is the variable incidence stabilizer like a C-180. Or, you can do it all with bungees like the rudder trim on some Cessna singles. Mooney just used a combination of the latter two methods.

Probably no one remembers why the system was changed starting with the K. Bob Kromer told me that he was told that initial flight tests of the K (which were before Bob joined Mooney) showed undesireable characteristics, which apparently were unpredicted, and that required the change. But he didn’t recall anyone ever elaborating on what problem the were trying to solve. 

The K and all the long bodies have a bob weight and down spring. Bob weights are used to increase maneuvering stability by increasing stick force per g: The harder you pull back, the more g’s you pull and the more the bob weight pulls against you. The down spring might have been to improve low speed airspeed stability: at lower TAS, the elevators are less effective and you have to pull back more on the controls to change pitch which stretches the spring and it pulls against you.

Skip

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, ArtVandelay said:

Is there an SB somewhere that allows you to remove the bungees?
I remember seeing a Mooney on the ramp that had elevators that freely moved.

No not on the ones that came with them They are integral to the aircraft stability certification. 

You may have been looking at a later model.

NOW the question I have never had an answer to is?

Why did the elevator throws change on the 69 and on short bodies ? From 24 up 10 down (68 and earlier) to 22 each way (69 and on)? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was plenty of evolution going on related to the tail structure and set points… slowly over time and models…

Starting with…

1) wood structure of the M20A…

2) M20B had the short metal rudder, with the short rudder throw…

3) M20C had the short rudder, but improved the rudder throw… then improved again to get the long rudder….

4) Then Somebody also adorned it with a stinger tail, and a funky button hook on the top….  :)

5) Then adjusting the elevator throws a couple of degrees from being centered….  I’m familiar with the change… but don’t know the reasoning…


Expect that it has something to do with….  The phrase… “you can never have too much trim in a Mooney….”

I heard this during my less than ideal, non-Mooney specific transition training….

Very often, during the landing phase… with only two front seat passengers… the trim would be pretty close to max up….

I have never used the max down trim position even when loaded heavily toward the rear, and going super fast, near Vne….

 

How does that sound for a technical conversation set up?  Could just be evolution… it took that long to get there…

With the M20R… I never bump into the full up trim limit… I’m extra cautious of this, because the electric trim driving the system gets one hand on the wheel monitoring that it doesn’t hit the stops…

PP thoughts only, not a mechanic…

Best regards,

-a-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems strange that they changed it for 69 and on but didn't require retrofit to earlier  IF there was a pitch stability issue they were trying to address (which is the only reason I can think of for the change). Pitch stability issue somewhere at high AOA angles needing more down force?

Why the change and why not retroactive

Aeroengineers your phone is ringing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've only got a vague memory of this issue from 40+ years ago but I seem to remember something about the FAA wanting to reevaluate the short body for either stall recovery way out at the corners of what was required or spin recovery at the same parameters (out at the ends of the required spectrum). I don't have a clear memory of it but it was something along those lines. I've asked for 15 years of anyone I could find if they had any idea why but all I got was crickets, Even at the factory when Bill Wheat was there and others, no one could "remember" why. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to the TCDS, the change was made with M20C S/N 690001. Along with the change in elevator movement, the stabilizer incidence and trim bungee part number and setting changed. May be related to the increase in Vne and Vno that occurred at the same time. Maybe earlier models were running out of nose down trim at higher speeds.

Skip

2030232220_Screenshot2021-09-19at2_16_44PM.thumb.png.ce924d34684b7b13a031636a00fc1177.png

133230991_Screenshot2021-09-19at2_17_59PM.thumb.png.018b19942991a1128068b7251a974d16.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got the bungee blue print for both bungees right from Mooney when I was there and I haven't found any difference in them  Haven't looked at them for several years I'd have to find them in my papers somewhere.  

If nose down trim was the culprit I would think there would be a tremendous amount of trim drag then as the speed went up. I'm  more apt to think in terms of low speed issues.   

I wonder how much fwd shift in C of P there is as speed increases with our airfoil? Not a aero engineer so I have now idea how to figure it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.