Jump to content

Minnesota Crash


Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Nippernaper said:

It may seem counterintuitive, but it does seem like that's how wings typically fail.  See video link below of a cropduster pulling it's wings off.

 

That spar failed in the center of the fuselage in one place. The Minnesota Mooney failed just outside the main landing gear on each side leaving the center section intact. Totally different. The Embraer failed just as I would expect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/21/2023 at 9:19 PM, Shadrach said:

That spar failed in the center of the fuselage in one place. The Minnesota Mooney failed just outside the main landing gear on each side leaving the center section intact. Totally different. The Embraer failed just as I would expect.

Good point.  I guess I'm not too surprised that both wings can fail more-or-less simultaneously in a high g maneuver, as failure of one wing may not immediately result in an unloading of the other wing, especially if the rate of increase in the g loading is high.  In that case, even if the failure loads of the two wings differ, they probably are close enough that one failure will follow the other, if the loading is still increasing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Nippernaper said:

Good point.  I guess I'm not too surprised that both wings can fail more-or-less simultaneously in a high g maneuver, as failure of one wing may not immediately result in an unloading of the other wing, especially if the rate of increase in the g loading is high.  In that case, even if the failure loads of the two wings differ, they probably are close enough that one failure will follow the other, if the loading is still increasing.

If one side failed first, the intact side would roll into the failed wing. The load on the remaining wing would absolutely change. This Mooney folded like a Corsair folding for storage. The symmetry of the failure is remarkable.

OCZwaWQ9QXBp dCZwaWQ9QXBp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When a spar, or anything stiff, breaks, the mechanics of the failure may send a shockwave or other energy through the rest of the system.   That energy impinging on another component that is also stressed nearly to failure may be enough to push it past failure.   It isn't surprising that the same point on the other side of a symmetric system would also be the same to fail.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the rate of G increase is high enough, you could be well past the failure G by the time the failure progresses. 

So say one wing fails are 9G the other at 10G, but due to the G building so quickly, by the time the fractures progress, the wing is at 12G, you would see a pretty symmetrical failure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking through the NTSB database, where a structural failure has occurred prior to impact, failures of both wings do not appear to be especially rare. See below for an example from 2019 in a PA28:

The left aileron, outboard sections of the left and right wings, and the left and right
horizontal stabilizers were located about 1,500, 1,000, and 900 ft from the main wreckage, respectively.
Fractured areas of the left and right wings and the horizontal stabilizers were consistent with overload
separation before ground impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.