Jump to content

Fly runway heading—which runway


Recommended Posts

A buddy was doing practice Rnav approaches under VFR to say runway 09.  The  activerunway was say Rwy 18.  He was instructed by the tower on completion of approach to fly runway heading.  He flew the runway heading of runway 09.  He got scolded and admonished that he was supposed to fly the heading of the active runway, not the runway he was flying the approach to.  He was given a telephone number to call for further edification.  Is this correct?

Edited by mooneyflyfast
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If tower or approach had cleared me for a "practice RNAV 9, no separation services provided, maintain VFR, on the missed fly runway heading", I would fly the runway heading of runway 09.  I wouldn't think twice about that decision until I heard back from the tower.  File the get out of jail with the FAA, please definitely talk to the tower supervisor, and please report back here.  We might learn something!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the P/CG

 

RUNWAY HEADING The magnetic direction that corresponds with the runway centerline extended, not the painted runway number. When cleared to “fly or maintain runway heading,” pilots are expected to fly or maintain the heading that corresponds with the extended centerline of the departure runway. Drift correction shall not be applied; e.g., Runway 4, actual magnetic heading of the runway centerline 044, fly 044.

The controller is misinterpreting the meaning of "departure runway" which is not the necessarily the active runway or the runway is use for departures.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't believe there is a defined thing as "the active runway"?  You can be cleared to any runway by the tower controller at any time.  The only meaning I can think of of "active runway" is when you're told "Runway X in use," which just means to expect you'll get a clearance to that runway rather than the other(s).  As such, it's hard to think of any scenario where the tower controller has a leg to stand on, especially if he cleared the pilot for a low approach to runway 9.  If so, runway 9 would be the ONLY runway that matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have 3 years as a tower controller, 22 years and counting as an approach controller. Without the benefit of listening to the tapes, given how you described the situation, I would say that your friend was correct. I routinely issue practice approach clearances to "inactive" runways and usually issue "runway heading" for the missed approach - to me this means the heading of the runway to which the approach was flown and I've never had a pilot interpret those instructions any other way.

Having said all this, it will be important to review the tapes, many occurrences have been due to what someone thought they said, or thought they heard. It's why in our recurrent training "read back, hear back" is often one of the themes.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, ohdub said:

I have 3 years as a tower controller, 22 years and counting as an approach controller. Without the benefit of listening to the tapes, given how you described the situation, I would say that your friend was correct. I routinely issue practice approach clearances to "inactive" runways and usually issue "runway heading" for the missed approach - to me this means the heading of the runway to which the approach was flown and I've never had a pilot interpret those instructions any other way.

What would be more troubling is if a pilot going missed from a practice approach suddenly turned and flew runway heading on the “active” runway. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So...

In this thread there is plenty of experience...

1) ATC

2) CFII, with a specialty in FARs...

3) IR pilots...

4) And me... :)

5) Not enough info to go on...?

6) Something got mis-understood, mis-heard, mis-interpreted... by somebody...

 

Get the tapes info if possible... the PIC will want to know what happened... as much as we would like to know...

Best regards,

-a-

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hadn't seen the reply from @ohdub and was curious what a controller would say, so I asked over in a FB Group with controllers.   They all basically said the same as OHDUB that flying 090 is what would be expected.

I know I would have done the same thing.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.