1964-M20E Posted December 14, 2020 Report Posted December 14, 2020 You are going to buy a new propeller for an E,F or J model (naturally aspirated, 200HP) and assume for the moment costs and weight are not factors. @Cody Stallings Which one would you get? Which one it the most efficient in turning HP and torque into usable thrust? Which one is the quietest? Your own question? I expect the answer to each will be different. Quote
201Mooniac Posted December 14, 2020 Report Posted December 14, 2020 I recently had to decide that for my J model and decided to go with the MT prop based on lower weight (I know you mentioned that isn't a factor but I like the few extra lbs payload), better climb, and smaller diameter so more ground clearance. I found out it seems quieter as well. I also think it looks great. 1 Quote
Guest Posted December 14, 2020 Report Posted December 14, 2020 It very much depends on the types of airports you frequent, and you proximity to repair services. An MT may present service issues that conventional aluminum bladed propellers don’t. I have an MT on my Comanche 400, as it was the only legal option for me. Clarence Quote
carusoam Posted December 14, 2020 Report Posted December 14, 2020 I would ask the aero engineer from Kansas... why he bought the MT and if he still likes it... And would he order it differently the next time..? Size, weight, and cost matter... efficiency, noise abatement, and the paint being able to Stick to it... are important too... Lots of good experience in recent history... Then comparison to a TopProp... Check on the delivery schedule... we can have an engine built in two weeks... props can take months... PP thoughts only, not a mechanic... Best regards, -a- Quote
PT20J Posted December 15, 2020 Report Posted December 15, 2020 Clarence @M20Doc, what’s your maintenance experience been: McCauley vs Hartzell? Quote
JimB Posted December 15, 2020 Report Posted December 15, 2020 (edited) I installed my new MT just a few months ago and very pleased. No RPM restrictions, gained some useful load, very smooth, no airworthiness directives, no noticeable cruise speed drop, seems quieter, a bit more ground clearance and it seems like to me, she starts easier with less mass to get moving. Other than my investment, there isn't anything not to like so far. But sometimes you do get what you pay for. Edited December 15, 2020 by JimB 1 Quote
1964-M20E Posted December 15, 2020 Author Report Posted December 15, 2020 4. For all of the composite props what's the TBO on these? MT SB-1 says 1800 hours???? 6 years??? McCauley 2000 hours 6 years? Hartzell ?? I know from other posts Canada has a calendar limit as well as hours and the US does not. Quote
0TreeLemur Posted December 15, 2020 Report Posted December 15, 2020 (edited) 99% of what there is to know about propellers was known by the end of WWII. Somebody else on MS said that, but it makes sense. Having just installed a new Hartzell top-prop, I can say that it is quieter. Essentially the same as the one it replaced in every other way that I can detect. No 100h ECI AD is nice, but I wish I didn't have to spend money on a new prop. If a few dB quieter or a few lbs of UL increase or a shorter takeoff run and a few kts slower (faster) in cruise makes you happy, go for it. If you are a CB, find a good used one. Edited December 15, 2020 by 0TreeLemur added photo. 1 Quote
carusoam Posted December 15, 2020 Report Posted December 15, 2020 What changed since the end of WWII... Metal alloy technology (funny, because so much was known prior to WWII about the alloys themselves) manufacturing techniques (high precision machining and finishing) composite technology (funny, because the composite core is wood) Computer modeling, and design... (modeling in WWII included a lot manual mathematics...) Close enough got us pretty far... The composite props really lower the sound profile outside... My favorite prop manufacturer... goofed up the easy part... the spinner OD does not match my airplane cowl... So... make sure your spinner gets the right OD... Best regards, -a- 1 Quote
Guest Posted December 15, 2020 Report Posted December 15, 2020 2 hours ago, PT20J said: Clarence @M20Doc, what’s your maintenance experience been: McCauley vs Hartzell? No noticeable difference from what I’ve seen. Clarence Quote
Yetti Posted December 15, 2020 Report Posted December 15, 2020 Apparently the Wright brothers got to 70% efficiency in their props. And has not changed that much since then. 1 Quote
ArtVandelay Posted December 15, 2020 Report Posted December 15, 2020 Apparently the Wright brothers got to 70% efficiency in their props. And has not changed that much since then.We’re closer to 85% (peak) efficient today. Quote
Seth Posted December 15, 2020 Report Posted December 15, 2020 (edited) 17 hours ago, carusoam said: I would ask the aero engineer from Kansas... why he bought the MT and if he still likes it... And would he order it differently the next time..? Size, weight, and cost matter... efficiency, noise abatement, and the paint being able to Stick to it... are important too... Lots of good experience in recent history... Then comparison to a TopProp... Check on the delivery schedule... we can have an engine built in two weeks... props can take months... PP thoughts only, not a mechanic... Best regards, -a- Months - My order from MT took months, way longer than the state backlog. Of course it occurred during the early stages of COVID and thus that may have caused some of the delay. I'll write this up when I give my full review on what I've done with my Missile. The reason I went with MT was due to: -Smaller diameter -Lighter (both W&B and mass for startup) -Removal of full feathering prop (saves failure point and weight) -Newer technology -Better runway performance -Better climb -Nickel leading edge designed for turboprops (instead of the stainless steel leading edge) which is even harder -Equal or better speed up to a certain altitude (TBD) I have a 300 HP normally aspirated engine thus no turbo. The four blade causes more drag, thus at low power settings it will be slower. In a back to back comparison over a metal three blade, a Cirrus SR22T turbo was faster at all altitudes. The NA SR22 was faster until over 13,000 feet. I rarely go that high so I went with the 4 blade I'm worried about long term maintenance and paint issuses. Will explain more in my write up. I'd look at the TOP Prop. If you go into short runways a lot, look at a three blade for runway and climb performance advantages. Your cruise speed will likely be fastest with a two blade. -Seth Edited December 15, 2020 by Seth 3 Quote
jetdriven Posted December 16, 2020 Report Posted December 16, 2020 I want to see how many guys it takes to remove the lower cowling with that 4 blade prop 1 Quote
Seth Posted December 16, 2020 Report Posted December 16, 2020 1 hour ago, jetdriven said: I want to see how many guys it takes to remove the lower cowling with that 4 blade prop We should take a funny picture when we touch up the paint again! We’ll get everyone out to the airport and take a picture with 12 people working it. -Seth 1 Quote
brad Posted December 17, 2020 Report Posted December 17, 2020 Really happy with my new simitar. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.