Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Very few survived the conversion debacle of the Florida hurricane...

There may be a couple of remaining Porsche powered Long Bodies on MS...

Many have been converted to fly with other engines... at least one around here has the water cooled IO540, making it the liquid Rocket...

Old fuzzy memories... possibly inaccurate at best...

Best regards,

-a-

 

Posted

MT prop and Porsche engine... not the usual sounds we would expect....

:)

The sound of a Rocket with an MT is really awesome from the outside perspective...

Best regards,

-a-

  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, ThorFlight said:

Who knew! Anyone know how many are still left running with the Porsche engine? 

BTW: If you want to re-engine with a Porsche, there's a guy in Moscow who can hook you up! https://www.ebay.com/itm/Porsche-PFM-3200-Aircraft-3-2L-Engine-Assembly-NEW-/254215434216

 

 

Just a minor modification, logbook entry. It’s on the TCDS.

Posted

A mate of mine here in Australia owns two of these beautiful machines.  Haven't been for a ride in one of his yet due to the tyranny of distance.  

Rode in one about 30 years ago and I remember it as being smooth and reasonably quite.

  • Like 1
  • 2 months later...
Posted

So.... this was in January. Fast forward a month, and he’s parting out this aircraft. 
what happened????

Posted
On 1/2/2020 at 9:58 PM, carusoam said:

Very few survived the conversion debacle of the Florida hurricane...

There may be a couple of remaining Porsche powered Long Bodies on MS...

Many have been converted to fly with other engines... at least one around here has the water cooled IO540, making it the liquid Rocket...

Old fuzzy memories... possibly inaccurate at best...

Best regards,

-a-

 

@carusoam I was reading the NTSB  report of the Bravo that crashed in Montana a while back and saw it was a liquid rocket which got me very interested in learning more.  Apparently it’s a TSIOL-550?  Can you (or anyone else) tell me why it never got traction?

Posted

It was too heavy, and too expensive, which are two attributes that CB Mooney owners care about the most. Without a gross weight increase, it cut into an already marginal useful load, and the cost of the engine was unacceptable, and that was before Continental figured out the true cost of the engine. Today's price would be even more ridiculous.

  • Like 1
Posted

As far as performance goes... it had even more HP...

But, the M20L was limited by MGToW... by its under developed legs...

So extra engine weight wasn’t going to be very helpful...

 

New legs came with the M20M...

Don’t know if anyone tried to put M legs on an L...

PP thoughts only, not a historian...

Best regards,

-a-

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.