Jump to content

J vs K with regards to noise level


mccdeuce

Recommended Posts

Things that effect the noise in the cabin...

1) the J has a muffler... the K doesn’t... it’s noise is adsorbed by a complex turbo system... :)

2) Most of the noise you are going to hear is generated by the prop tips as they are going towards the speed of sound, kind of...

3) Check the prop diameter to see which tips are going faster... @ 2700 rpm  Many Mooneys share the same prop diameter... they would be longer if the ground wasn’t so close...

4) The longer nose technically puts that noise much further out front... +1 for a six cylinder engine mounted far away...

5) Some Js And Ks have been outfitted with composite props... the Composite Sound absorber has an interesting sound profile while the plane is in T/O mode... very noticeable on the ground...

6) Window thickness... the more thick and angled the better... J and K are sharing the same geometry, but may have a thicker window installed...

7) Taken to an extreme... Find a Long Body with an MT on the front... with a thick windscreen... and cruise in a low rpm setting...  Long Bodies are amazingly quiet inside compared to other planes with near vertical windshields and the prop mounted nearby...

8) Could be the sound adsorbing materials used inside the plane... Materials cost money, and they come with weight... some planes have this deleted for both reasons...

PP thoughts only, not an aero-audio engineer...

Best regards,

-a-

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to add one additional point to Anthony's excellent list.

9) Air density has quite a bit to do with noise. In the thin air of the flight levels between FL200 and FL280 where the K's are at home, the air is too thin to transmit much of the noise from the engine and prop. The result is a quieter ride. The J flying in thicker air 10K to 15K lower will generate significantly more noise.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I owned a J for 500 hours and now have near 300 hours in my 1997 K model. The K is much smoother and quieter. The 6 cylinder Continental is smoother than the 4 cylinder Lycoming. It also does not have the annoying yellow rpm range that can be an issue on landing in the J. The factory also added more noise deadening in the later years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw a pic of someone’s engine side firewall with insulation material.  Wonder if that would cut some of the noise.  

My plane is loudest at the footwell 95Db or so.  It’s mostly engine noise.  

85 Db or so in the rear. 

The continentals always sound better to me.

Prop noise and vibration is just as much of a factor as engine noise  -  the composite props are notably smoother and a little less noisy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First two posts covered it from a technical perspective.  Paul's post is the practical answer.  You fly the K higher than the J, air density is lower, less sound transmission.  The way you actually use the planes, the K is quieter.  If you're planning on flying a K low enough that it's an apples to apples comparison, the noise doesn't matter, you want a J.

As a K owner who transitioned from a rental J, though, I will second Larryb's observation that whatever the dB meter says, the K's engine is a lot smoother and that continuous drone is less unpleasant to listen to than the racket a four cylinder Lycoming makes.  If the Lycomings weren't basically bulletproof, vastly lighter, and much more economical to maintain, I can't see why anybody'd ever use them...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


As a K owner who transitioned from a rental J, though, I will second Larryb's observation that whatever the dB meter says, the K's engine is a lot smoother and that continuous drone is less unpleasant to listen to than the racket a four cylinder Lycoming makes.  If the Lycomings weren't basically bulletproof, vastly lighter, and much more economical to maintain, I can't see why anybody'd ever use them...

My AP tells me my engine is the smoothest Lycoming he’s ever ran FWIW. I’ve never flown a 6 cylinder so I can’t comment on it vs a 6. I have no complaints.


Tom
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ArtVandelay said:


My AP tells me my engine is the smoothest Lycoming he’s ever ran FWIW. I’ve never flown a 6 cylinder so I can’t comment on it vs a 6. I have no complaints.


Tom

As flat fours go, I guess the Lycomings aren't that bad overall.  Ever drive a Toyota FRS.  The Subaru powerplant in that is a really nasty, thrashy thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, johncuyle said:

As flat fours go, I guess the Lycomings aren't that bad overall.  Ever drive a Toyota FRS.  The Subaru powerplant in that is a really nasty, thrashy thing.

Some of us love the really nasty, thrashy sound from the EJ25 and other Subaru boxers...

But maybe not for 4-5 hours at a time :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, johncuyle said:

If you're planning on flying a K low enough that it's an apples to apples comparison, the noise doesn't matter, you want a J.

As the proud owner of a K 252, I second this statement. I wouldn't give up my 252 for a J, but then I fly above 15K ft. more often than not. 

Make your decision based on the altitude you typically fly...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ArtVandelay said:


My AP tells me my engine is the smoothest Lycoming he’s ever ran FWIW. I’ve never flown a 6 cylinder so I can’t comment on it vs a 6. I have no complaints.


Tom

The last IA to work on my plane, responsible for my visit to Joey Cole to fix what he did, was absolutely shocked at how quickly and easily my C cranked up, and by how easily I was able to hot start it . . . . But he will never touch it again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.