Jump to content

Got my renewal insurance quote today...


Recommended Posts

I've been with Starr insurance. When I bought my Mooney I had under 5 hours complex time.  About 80tt.  Zero in a Mooney.  My annual premium was ~$1500.  Now, I'm instrument rated. Nearly 300tt.  Almost 200hrs complex/mooney time.  Starr decided my rate should be ~$2100.  That was a shock, to see it go up so much, not at all what I expected. I got another quote from Global Aerospace, and bound a policy with them. $915 for the year.  And a much much more liberal open pilot policy, with all the other coverages being identical.  I guess Starr doesn't want to write mooney policies this year.  

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can confirm your rates as I’m in the exact same bracket. Had Starr last year for the same amount, was a 80ish hr pilot (from almost 15 years ago), and I’m currently renewing with Global.  Only difference is weather, family, and work got in the way the past four months  and I’m just short of my instrument and less than 150 hrs added this year.  The cost for my laziness? An extra $200 it looks like. 

I’m concerned for others trying to get a first time policy like we did.  Starr was the only underwriter that was covering newer pilots and they also bumped my renewal up to $2100 ish.  Guess I’m glad I got “in” when I did but fear others with my history will be spending another 1 amu to get in the game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My insurance is with Falcon (their USAA division) and the first year was underwritten by Starr. I was at similar numbers to you and it was roughly $1,500. When I went for renewal they had it underwritten by Global Aerospace. I don't have an IR but put on about 140 hours in the Mooney that first year. The renewal came in at $1005. They didn't tell me what Starr was quoting, just that Global provided the best rate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep in mind that when discussing premium figures you need to state what liability limits are selected and if the limits are smooth or not as well as what the hull limits are. Without those variables, and pilot times,  it is tough to compare apples to apples.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only thing available for me within reason is the common 1M/100k policy.  Don’t think many underwriters are doing smooth policies for low time pilots. 

I still need to check on the info I received on this forum that the 100k limit is only for passengers inside the plane. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ragedracer1977 said:

1mm smooth.  51k hull ground and motion.  $0 deductible 

You must have requested the smooth?  I would be surprised that they gave you that rate as a low time pilot.  I’d check the policy again. 

If true that’s a great rate and it looks like the extra 50 hrs and IR could have saved me another $500.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, MIm20c said:

You must have requested the smooth?  I would be surprised that they gave you that rate as a low time pilot.  I’d check the policy again. 

If true that’s a great rate and it looks like the extra 50 hrs and IR could have saved me another $500.

From what I understand it is tough to get smooth liability limits for reasonable rates without an instrument rating. If I am not mistaken some carriers will not even underwrite it without the IR.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Premiums from most underwriters took a sharp increase a few weeks ago, after years of soft market rates.  When I asked AOPAIA about that at SnF last week, they mentioned that Global was the only major underwriter that hadn't yet ramped up rates. That may be part of the story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MIm20c said:

You must have requested the smooth?  I would be surprised that they gave you that rate as a low time pilot.  I’d check the policy again. 

If true that’s a great rate and it looks like the extra 50 hrs and IR could have saved me another $500.

You're right.  It's not smooth.   The layout of the quote made me skip over the 100k per passenger limit.  On the starr side it's all on one line, on the global its on a separate line.  I did catch one other difference.  Global doesn't cover flights to the Caribbean while starr does.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bravoman said:

Keep in mind that when discussing premium figures you need to state what liability limits are selected and if the limits are smooth or not as well as what the hull limits are. Without those variables, and pilot times,  it is tough to compare apples to apples.

Very true, I was just comparing that it was similar that Global came in much lower on this renewal when my original Starr was the best quote.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, MIm20c said:

Only thing available for me within reason is the common 1M/100k policy.  Don’t think many underwriters are doing smooth policies for low time pilots. 

I still need to check on the info I received on this forum that the 100k limit is only for passengers inside the plane. 

We ran into the same issue with potential partners in a co-ownership we were trying to get set-up.  There was a low limit in how much liability could be purchased and those of us with an instrument rating, 1,000+ hrs and financial assets wanted more coverage.  We couldn't get a split policy, just all or nothing.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is why your broker should always price the entire market each renewal. Companies shift focus all the time. Global Aerospace used to be very high but would insure difficult pilots (i.e. student pilots, etc). But recently they decided they wanted in the higher time pilot market. So they move in and then someone else decides the ocean is too bloody and they move somewhere more blue. Its a constantly shifting market.

 

-Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, RobertGary1 said:

This is why your broker should always price the entire market each renewal. Companies shift focus all the time. Global Aerospace used to be very high but would insure difficult pilots (i.e. student pilots, etc). But recently they decided they wanted in the higher time pilot market. So they move in and then someone else decides the ocean is too bloody and they move somewhere more blue. Its a constantly shifting market.

 

-Robert

The broker told me many Mooney and Grumman owners are moving from Starr to Global this year.  Starr apparently took a beating on those 2 makes last year...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I renewed 3/10 and switched from Starr to XL.  

2017 - Starr - $2575: $120k hull / $1m/100k subs - New pilot w/ ~80 hours, 0 complex, 0 Mooney (required 5 hrs transition + 5 solo)

2018 - XL - $2,200: $120k hull / $1M smooth - ~250 hours w/ 160 Mooney time.

 

I pushed really hard for a smooth policy and made that my number one ask for my broker.  I had also been told an IR was required and it was my goal, but lost 2 months due to an AOG issue, so didn't get it done in time.  XL was the only carrier that offered a smooth policy.  

BTW, did my IR checkride today, woot!  On to commercial..

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, vance.k said:

I renewed 3/10 and switched from Starr to XL.  

2017 - Starr - $2575: $120k hull / $1m/100k subs - New pilot w/ ~80 hours, 0 complex, 0 Mooney (required 5 hrs transition + 5 solo)

2018 - XL - $2,200: $120k hull / $1M smooth - ~250 hours w/ 160 Mooney time.

 

I pushed really hard for a smooth policy and made that my number one ask for my broker.  I had also been told an IR was required and it was my goal, but lost 2 months due to an AOG issue, so didn't get it done in time.  XL was the only carrier that offered a smooth policy.  

BTW, did my IR checkride today, woot!  On to commercial..

Congrats on the IR...... And it does get you about 20%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congratulations on the IR @vance.k and if you contact XL with the good news I am interested with a follow up on how much it impacted your rate.

I have a friend who bought an early J model while still working on his PP in a Piper.  He stayed with the Piper because he was almost done and just completed his checkride this week and will begin transition.  He told me his initial rate was over $3,000 and if I'm not mistaken almost $3,500 but I don't know how much coverage he got.  His underwriter required 10hrs dual and 15hrs solo prior to passengers.  I was shocked at that rate, but I guess the insurance company had to assume he was flying the Mooney solo prior to completion of the PP.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For $125k hull value, last year's premium was $2,130, this year's renewal was $1,560. I'm a high time Mooney pilot with a few certificates and ratings so the premium is based on my partner's time and ratings but he's around a 300-400 hour instrument rated pilot with probably 200 Mooney hours. USAIG but more importantly I have a PHENOMENAL broker. Wendy Wenk <wendy@wenkaviation.com>.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, KLRDMD said:

For $125k hull value, last year's premium was $2,130, this year's renewal was $1,560. I'm a high time Mooney pilot with a few certificates and ratings so the premium is based on my partner's time and ratings but he's around a 300-400 hour instrument rated pilot with probably 200 Mooney hours. USAIG but more importantly I have a PHENOMENAL broker. Wendy Wenk <wendy@wenkaviation.com>.

Did you get rid of the baron?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.