Jake Posted November 23, 2010 Report Share Posted November 23, 2010 I'm considering replacing my 2 bladed prop with the 3 bladed. I've been told that my climb performance will improve. What about top speed. Its also been stated that runway takeoff roll will be shortened. I'm looking for others that can give their experience or knowledge on this subject Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lood Posted November 23, 2010 Report Share Posted November 23, 2010 That's what I've also heard. The general feeling is that take off and climb performance improves a little, but apparently, you loose a couple of knots in the cruise. Some also complain that the three blader cuts into the usefull load as it's heavier than the two blader and probably a bit more expensive to maintain as well. Most agree that the three blader is quieter though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moodychief Posted November 23, 2010 Report Share Posted November 23, 2010 I have a three bladed prop on my 63 C model. I love it. It seems to be a little quiter than two bladed. I'm not sure about cruise penalty though. You can check my ground speeds on Flight Aware (N6561U). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottfromiowa Posted November 23, 2010 Report Share Posted November 23, 2010 Please look at other posts on this subject. It has been beaten like a lathered, tired mule... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt_CrashN_Burn Posted November 24, 2010 Report Share Posted November 24, 2010 3 for show and 2 for go! It's already been said, 3 gives better take-off and climb performance at the cost of cruise speed. The 3 is quieter but costs more. Make your choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M016576 Posted November 24, 2010 Report Share Posted November 24, 2010 Quote: JimR I can understand why the three bladers would be quieter if the blades were shorter than the OEM two bladers, but that isn't the case for any of the three blade Mooney retrofit options except for the MT, I believe. With identical blade lengths and rpm, why would the three bladers be any quieter than the two bladers? I'm not challenging Capt's (and many others') assertion, as I have no experience with three blade props on Mooneys. I just want to understand why that would be the case. Jim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnum Posted November 24, 2010 Report Share Posted November 24, 2010 I talked to the CEO of MT here in Germany about the 3 blade prop for my J-model. He told me to expect better climb performance than the McCauley, and no speed loss because of the new scimitar design. But then he said it will only make (economical) sense if I need a new prop anyway. So as long as the McCauley is within limits, keep it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vref Posted November 24, 2010 Report Share Posted November 24, 2010 ground clearance is a bit better, that extra blade comes with a serious price tag difference...I went for a GO..verhauled version..;-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piloto Posted November 24, 2010 Report Share Posted November 24, 2010 I agree with Job on the aplication of multiple blad props. Another thing to keep in mind although remote but possible blade separation is more likely on a three blade than on a two blade. Also handling on the ground with the towbar is easier on a two blade prop. Overhaul cost is about 50% more on three blade. The only time is worth to have three blade is when power is increased beyond 270hp. José Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.