Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Use tax is one reason I will not be buying a new aircraft or buying a corporate owned one.  Texas has an exception for casual sales. Basically if you buy it from an individual, not in the business of aircraft sales, no use tax is owed.

  • Like 2
Posted

In California we get to pay property tax (partially) on the hangar we don't own!

We get this in Texas too.  I had to pay tax on a tie down one year.  --it was something like $6

Posted

Jesus.  What else do I have to add to my spreadsheet I missed?  Maybe I should just light $100K on fire.  

 

Now here is a guy who "gets it" about plane ownership!

  • Like 3
Posted

Jesus. What else do I have to add to my spreadsheet I missed? Maybe I should just light $100K on fire.

My general rules about plane ownership are as follows:

1) Everything will cost twice as much as I think it should

2) Everything will take twice as long as I am told

3) The size of an airplane part is indirectly proportional to its cost

And finally;

4) My wife was correct (although I won't admit it to her face) when she said "It would have been cheaper if you had a cocaine habit"

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  • Like 6
Posted

I went through the sales tax exemption process in CA too as Jerry described. But this was over a dozen years ago with an aircraft purchase price of over $200K - so I was very motivated to make the effort for 8% savings. My purchase was entirely for personal use so I followed a different protocol which kept the aircraft out of state for over 3 months. The rules have since changed and as far as I know the exemption is only good for business use today. However anyone interested in this only needs to go to the CA BOE website and read up to find out if there is anyway they pull it off. Well worth it if you can.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

My general rules about plane ownership are as follows:

1) Everything will cost twice as much as I think it should

2) Everything will take twice as long as I am told

3) The size of an airplane part is indirectly proportional to its cost

And finally;

4) My wife was correct (although I won't admit it to her face) when she said "It would have been cheaper if you had a cocaine habit"

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

meh.ro5604.jpg

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.