Jump to content

Manifold Pressure line.....weep hole


Recommended Posts

My understanding is that it's a hole for excess moisture, oil, residual fuel to escape. I've had an install on a MVP-50 that didn't have the weep hole... Constant Manafold pressure issues! I'm sure there is more technical reason.

-Matt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On my C, the small 1/8" aluminum line from one cylinder's intake ran directly through the firewall to the back of the instrument...

The intake is full of dark blue gooey deposits coating everything...

The tiny hole (vent) is drilled in the 1/8" line. It is a calibrated hole dimension. Too big the gage will read low, too small the gage reads high.

My experience comes from the vibrations cracked the soft aluminum. While searching for the problem, I broke the line open (in flight).

This is also the moment that I lost faith in instruments that bring hot or flammable liquids into the cockpit. OK for high priced planes back in the 60's. Not so good for a family flying on a budget...

I had heard of the weep hole, but could not find any documented evidence. Mine was broken in half and really hard to measure.

Bill Wheat was probably my best resource for this... The hole is documented in one of the IP drawings for the older Mooneys, but not in any of the C drawings...

Bought drill bit, had mechanic take care the details...requires cutting the tube, flanging the end and reinstalling...

The instrument is under vacuum until the engine shuts down. Without the vent hole, fuel/air mixture would be drawn towards the instrument...

Overall, with the proper details, it's a fifteen minute job....?

Best regards,

-a-

From my hand written notes.... 0.023" drill. Keep in mind 1/32" is .032". This is tiny....!

Also keep in mind, I am not a mechanic....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cliffy,

I was less than clear...

C,D,E, and F were produced concurrently. All had the same weep hole.

I believe the F drawings have the detail captured on the drawing. I was looking as an owner of a C. The 1/8" flexible aluminum line is barely documented, never mind the weep hole.

I tried to buy the line from my MSC, they sent me one for a J? instead... 1/4" rigid tube?

I believe it may have the same weep hole. My memory wasn't that good then either...

Best regards,

-a-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is interesting as I've never heard of it before. At first glance I would think the hole would affect the MP reading at lower MP setting. I would think it would act like any other induction leak but would have a direct effect on the MP gauge reading. I'm going to ask a real old timer A&P friend of mine if he ever heard of such a thing. Interesting, very interesting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cliffy,

Now you're being funny...

It does act like any other induction leak allowing excess air into that particular cylinder.

Unlike any other induction leak, it is directly affecting the instrument with the improper air flow.

Without the hole the MP indicates off the instrument...

With the hole cracked open slightly, the MP is off a couple inches...

With the hole broken open, it reads atmospheric pressure even while idling...

Hence the word calibrated being used. The instrument is sensitive to the small hole.

Knowing MP and RPM is key to proper power management.

My C lost the MP this way.

It lost The rpm gauge via a worn drive cable, it wobbled until the needle fell off...

Great trivia for the non digital instruments guys...

You'll need to find that drawing for proof.

My digital instruments still have analog needles...

Best regards,

-a-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waiting to hear back from the "old timer"  but this is something I want to learn about. 

Lost my MP once due to broken 1/8" line  Makes no difference to as I'm full throttle or pulling back for landing :-)

I may also have a contact for the drawing on the line but it might take a while to get it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Additional info...

From the parts Manuel...

Figure 17 Instrument Panel Assembly. Page 74

This drawing depicts all the wires and hoses going to the backs of all the instruments.

Figure and index nos...

17-41 FP and MP gauge

17-42 hose, snubber, and hardware list...

17-43 MP line and hardware list... Gives two part numbers for the lines....

660061-3 for C,D,E

660121-3 for F

I think the part numbers may give a hint to a drawing number with the reference.

Now, how does one get an engineering drawing for the individual part?

As José points out above the instrument manufacturer would be the one with the knowledge of the hole dimension.

Note that the FP indicates a need for a snubber, the MP, nary a hint!

Why is the F different than the others?

Hope that helps,

-a-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

They leak, they don't seal. They are supposed to drain excess fuel in the intake sump. 

Don't over prime and they are not needed. 

The ball type ones are better than the Piper diaphragm type. 

-Matt

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.