What surprised me was the number of planes I saw with extensive paint work done, and in some cases not noted at all in the logs. What causes all this partial repainting and if it was extensive enough to replace the wing walk, etc., why not just note it in the logs? What causes one to have thick globbing clear coat running all down the ailerons? Why is overspray all over the place? In some cases it's in the logs but never mentioned during any discussion with the seller. I've learned that when "year painted" is omitted from the listing that potentially is avoiding an issue. One wing repainted and not the other - and not in the logs. What's the deal there? A plane repainted three times in only a couple hundred hours yet not mentioned throughout several discussions with a seller? Sure, no big deal as long as it's discovered, right? I've got about $5,000 into travel looking at planes so far this fall. I'm chalking that up to getting a great education. By the way, with the 2015 - the first time I called there was full disclosure as to the nature of the work done on that plane. That's the way it should be. There's no excuse to cause someone to travel to see a plane with full intent to purchase it knowing full well that there are issues that should be disclosed. Like I said, I've learned a lot. Now that I've learned that there's no substitute for getting a copy of the logs prior to making travel plans, there's another thing: get a title search done from aerospace for $95. That shows N number changes and in one case I learned things based on the previous N number that I wouldn't have found out. In another case I found that the N number had been changed three times and the paint work was runny and sloppy.